Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not a documentary.......just a zionist jew video packed full of lies and half truths. ......OK lets start with this short documentary..
Pierre Rehov is a zionist Jew, so of course he is going to take the side of the Israel in his documentaries and paint the Palestinians in a bad light. ....Pierre Rehov directed six major documentaries:
OK lets start with this short documentary
Here's part 1
You guys really love this one video. Unfortunately for you and Captain Fowl Mouth, what the narrator is saying is pure conjecture and doesn't prove the video was staged.
"Why did the ambulance stop so far away?"
"Why was the injured man dragged so roughly?"
"Why can't we see any blood?"
That's conjecture. That's not proof.
That was Roufti's first video to. But hey, pick another one, maybe your luck will change? Or, I could pick one and you could tell me what was faked; how it was faked; and why would the Israeli's allow a film crew, in full daylight, make a propaganda video showing Israel in a bad light, right in front of their eyes and not do something about it.
"Why did the ambulance stop so far away?"
Because Israeli's are known for shooting at first responders.
"Why was the injured man dragged so roughly?"
Because people don't normally take their time when they are under fire.
"Why can't we see any blood?"
From across the street.
One of the more prevalent child actors for Pallywood.
Isn't this a delightful little monster. You can even see what appears to be her parents encouraging her to attack the Israeli soldiers for the cameras
Next we have Pallywood faking the birth at a checkpoint story.
Here's a fake video from the IDF regarding the Mavi Marmara incident.
If the video is fake, one should have no problem pointing out what is fake about it.
Proven to be faked, and the person who faked it admitted to doing so.
The first picture looks nothing like the second one, and even home use software would create a better close up than these. The shape of the superstructure is not even close and is what caught out the LIAR who tried to pass it of as the same vessel.
Pierre Rehov is a zionist Jew, so of course he is going to take the side of the Israel in his documentaries and paint the Palestinians in a bad light. ....Pierre Rehov directed six major documentaries:
I was giving you an example of how to properly prove a video is fake. Simply posting the video and claiming its fake, doesn't cut it.Don't engage the idiot in his/her switch and bait. The subject is Pallywood not the ego we know as Billo.
You claiming videos (showing Palestinian hardship) fake, while posting obviously fake hasbara videos, IS the subject.He/she thinks every thread is all about him/her rather than has the common decency to stick to the subject. Why he/she is allowed to continue with that behavior when everyone else is censured for doing so is beyond me but yeah. Don't engage the idiot in his/her bait and switch bull shit.
What was racist about it?The subject is Pallywood not Billo's phony racist claims.
In that video, there's an obvious break in the film. So how do we know the man standing around, was AFTER he was injured and not BEFORE?Speaking of which
While I might agree the Independent shouldn't have used the picture for its story, it's worth noting there ARE children in Israeli prisons. You just don't see them, because Israel refuses to allow any independent media personnel access to see them.
Here's a fake video from the IDF regarding the Mavi Marmara incident.
If the video is fake, one should have no problem pointing out what is fake about it.
Proven to be faked, and the person who faked it admitted to doing so.
The first picture looks nothing like the second one, and even home use software would create a better close up than these. The shape of the superstructure is not even close and is what caught out the LIAR who tried to pass it of as the same vessel.
Don't engage the idiot in his/her switch and bait. The subject is Pallywood not the ego we know as Billo.
He/she thinks every thread is all about him/her rather than has the common decency to stick to the subject. Why he/she is allowed to continue with that behavior when everyone else is censured for doing so is beyond me but yeah. Don't engage the idiot in his/her bait and switch bull shit.
The subject is Pallywood not Billo's phony racist claims.
Speaking of which
And
This isn't about me.That pathetic ego just won't let you NOT try and take over every conversation will it Billo.
Evidence was presented, but it wasn't by you and it didn't prove I lied.Not only have you been proven wrong about your claims against the IDF AGAIN but you've lied again about there being no evidence to support my view.
But you weren't doing the explaining, just your fake video was.The short video's I've presented each go over one or two Pallywood scenes and explain in detail how they were staged.
If I didn't WATCH them, then how could I possibly comment (specifically) on what was IN them?You just don't have the courage to watch them and see for yourself
Again, this isn't about me; I didn't insist on anything; you still haven't explained what was racist about my comments; and you haven't answered a single question of mine.Instead and as usual you are desperate to change the subject, present more racist lies and even when shown how and why you are wrong, you mindlessly insist you are right. I'd guess narcissism with a large dose of cognitive dissonance.
I was giving you an example of how to properly prove a video is fake. Simply posting the video and claiming its fake, doesn't cut it.Don't engage the idiot in his/her switch and bait. The subject is Pallywood not the ego we know as Billo.
You claiming videos (showing Palestinian hardship) fake, while posting obviously fake hasbara videos, IS the subject.He/she thinks every thread is all about him/her rather than has the common decency to stick to the subject. Why he/she is allowed to continue with that behavior when everyone else is censured for doing so is beyond me but yeah. Don't engage the idiot in his/her bait and switch bull shit.
And you're still not explaining why (or how) they are faked, you're just posting videos and expecting people to believe they are.
What was racist about it?The subject is Pallywood not Billo's phony racist claims.
In that video, there's an obvious break in the film. So how do we know the man standing around, was AFTER he was injured and not BEFORE?Speaking of which
While I might agree the Independent shouldn't have used the picture for its story, it's worth noting there ARE children in Israeli prisons. You just don't see them, because Israel refuses to allow any independent media personnel access to see them.
BTW, there was nothing fake about the video, just the way the Independent used the picture. By the same token, it's no different than the anti-Muslim crowed showing a video of Palestinian's celebrating BEFORE 9/11 and claiming that they were dancing in response to 9/11.
If the picture on the left was the real attack on the Mavi Marmara and not just an altered picture of it, then why does the IDF video of it, show the same thing? Why is it completely different than other IDF videos that it is spliced in with, of that incident? And why are the events depicted in that b/w video, refuted by eye-witness testimony by people who were actually there?To keep to the topic of the thread -- either the video is correct -- in which case YOU just presented Pallywood propaganda with all the big red font and weak "evidence"..
OR
The video was staged by the IDF..
I (me) don't care.. Because in EITHER case it's propaganda by one side or the other. The more important point is NOT which side produced it -- but is the EVIDENCE real.
As for your comment about daytime versus nighttime -- I'm gonna show how good a photo-analyst I really am.
The prime reason the photo on the left is in B/W -- is because it's LIKELY done thru a night-vision camera..
((which would also explain the graininess and lack of contrast on that yellow stripe. Camera is basically recording thermal differences))
Well DUHHHHHH !!!Slap yourself in the forehead for me please.. Derp...
This isn't about me.That pathetic ego just won't let you NOT try and take over every conversation will it Billo.
Evidence was presented, but it wasn't by you and it didn't prove I lied.Not only have you been proven wrong about your claims against the IDF AGAIN but you've lied again about there being no evidence to support my view.
But you weren't doing the explaining, just your fake video was.The short video's I've presented each go over one or two Pallywood scenes and explain in detail how they were staged.
If I didn't WATCH them, then how could I possibly comment (specifically) on what was IN them?You just don't have the courage to watch them and see for yourself
Again, this isn't about me; I didn't insist on anything; you still haven't explained what was racist about my comments; and you haven't answered a single question of mine.Instead and as usual you are desperate to change the subject, present more racist lies and even when shown how and why you are wrong, you mindlessly insist you are right. I'd guess narcissism with a large dose of cognitive dissonance.
People who refuse to answer direct questions are not here to debate, they're here to troll.
If it was night vision equipment, it would show up as "green", not white.Easy the one on the left is night vision equipment so that is why it is b/w . The simplest answers are usually the best
I am not an amoeba, I am a human being.And how about you are a single celled organism from the sulphur pools of titan, the 112th brood mare of the 97th son of the 3rd king of pftessf sz
Here's a fake video from the IDF regarding the Mavi Marmara incident.
If the video is fake, one should have no problem pointing out what is fake about it.
Proven to be faked, and the person who faked it admitted to doing so.
The first picture looks nothing like the second one, and even home use software would create a better close up than these. The shape of the superstructure is not even close and is what caught out the LIAR who tried to pass it of as the same vessel.
Don't engage the idiot in his/her switch and bait. The subject is Pallywood not the ego we know as Billo.
He/she thinks every thread is all about him/her rather than has the common decency to stick to the subject. Why he/she is allowed to continue with that behavior when everyone else is censured for doing so is beyond me but yeah. Don't engage the idiot in his/her bait and switch bull shit.
The subject is Pallywood not Billo's phony racist claims.
Speaking of which
And
Yeah, but propaganda wasn't really the subject. Although I can see where your coming from. I was thinking more of the question about if Pallywood and its actors, camera men, directors, grips, set designers, the works is protected under freedom of the press laws.
The whole thing came up because in another thread coyote and I were involved in, she felt like this latest hunger striker should be protected under freedom of the press, and shouldn't have been detained without charges. I brought up that he was accused of incitement, and under the Geneva Conventions he could be held indefinitely .
Which brings us to Pallywood, but I didn't want to interrupt the other thread so I started this one.
I'd say any form of Pallywood production is not covered under freedom of the press laws because there is nothing resembling ethical news reporting involved. Its pure fiction. Its not an actual news team from an actual news outlet, even if it was, like the French team shown in several of the films, if they aren't working in an ethical manor but instead are staging events to misrepresent later then they are still not covered regardless of their affiliation.
I'm not even sure if the Arab Muslims in Gaza allow unbiased reporting from an actual independent news source.
And I keep asking you to explain why you think I'm a racist, but to date, you have refused. I guess baseless accusations are more to your liking?Actually among other things your a racist but thats besides the point.
This isn't about me.This nonsense you've so desperately tried to distract us with has been proven a lie whether you like it or not. One among many lies you cling to in order to maintain your cognitive dissonance
How could anyone tell what the subject is, with you keep moving the goal posts?The subject in case you missed it is if Pallywood productions are protected under freedom of the press laws.
But freedom of expression, is.I'd say no as the film industry regardless of if its fiction or not isn't covered under the ethics of journalism or by freedom of the press laws
Maybe you should see the OP, since half of your last 4 comments, were not on the thread topic.See the OP for further details
You have to first be a State, in order to be a State organization.So should a state organization designed to falsify information and engage in a smear campaign against another state be protected by freedom of the press laws ?
And I keep asking you to explain why you think I'm a racist, but to date, you have refused. I guess baseless accusations are more to your liking?Actually among other things your a racist but thats besides the point.
This isn't about me.This nonsense you've so desperately tried to distract us with has been proven a lie whether you like it or not. One among many lies you cling to in order to maintain your cognitive dissonance
How could anyone tell what the subject is, with you keep moving the goal posts?The subject in case you missed it is if Pallywood productions are protected under freedom of the press laws.
But freedom of expression, is.I'd say no as the film industry regardless of if its fiction or not isn't covered under the ethics of journalism or by freedom of the press laws
Maybe you should see the OP, since half of your last 4 comments, were not on the thread topic.See the OP for further details
You have to first be a State, in order to be a State organization.So should a state organization designed to falsify information and engage in a smear campaign against another state be protected by freedom of the press laws ?
