Parents of Sandy Hook kids want interview censored

[Harry Dresden]

I'd like to kick his ass a second time for titling a thread "dupe- ignore". Even though it is an accurate description of the poster and what should be done with him.

Hey stupid. When i saw that someone else had already started a thread on this subject, i changed the title to dupe. That's what we're supposed to do. And yet you libs still respond!!! You must really be scared of me.

and you must be really scared of me since you never respond to anything i say to you.....

 

[TexM3]

What would be the point to a cover up anyway? Of all the conspiracy theories out there, this is the dumbest....

Ask Eric Holder.

 

[2aguy]

Surely its just an act ? He makes a good living from acting like a twat, thats all it is.

While I absolutely agree with your assessment, and Jones himself recently testified in court (in order to get unsupervised access to his children) that he is not crazy, that's just a character he plays on the internet, you cannot discount the the number of posters just on this forum who spout his conspiracy theories and link to his bullshit website.

Look at the number of people just in this thread who are denying Sandy Hook happened.

Yep, there are still a few regulars that have yet to enrich this thread.
But in the main they are just harmless losers who burble away on obscure message boards and to their social workers.

But perhaps it is time for decent folk to make a stand. Pissing on the graves of slaughtered infants is surely not covered in any part of your constitution ?

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

Stevens? He asked for more prtotection...Hilary refused...no conspiracy there.....and then they lied about the attack.....no conspiracy there........

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

 

[bodecea]

While I absolutely agree with your assessment, and Jones himself recently testified in court (in order to get unsupervised access to his children) that he is not crazy, that's just a character he plays on the internet, you cannot discount the the number of posters just on this forum who spout his conspiracy theories and link to his bullshit website.

Look at the number of people just in this thread who are denying Sandy Hook happened.

Yep, there are still a few regulars that have yet to enrich this thread.
But in the main they are just harmless losers who burble away on obscure message boards and to their social workers.

But perhaps it is time for decent folk to make a stand. Pissing on the graves of slaughtered infants is surely not covered in any part of your constitution ?

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

Stevens? He asked for more prtotection...Hilary refused...no conspiracy there.....and then they lied about the attack.....no conspiracy there........

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

Where are you getting your mis-information? The Embassy had it's standard protection force. He left the embassy, you know.

 

[2aguy]

Yep, there are still a few regulars that have yet to enrich this thread.
But in the main they are just harmless losers who burble away on obscure message boards and to their social workers.

But perhaps it is time for decent folk to make a stand. Pissing on the graves of slaughtered infants is surely not covered in any part of your constitution ?

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

Stevens? He asked for more prtotection...Hilary refused...no conspiracy there.....and then they lied about the attack.....no conspiracy there........

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

Where are you getting your mis-information? The Embassy had it's standard protection force. He left the embassy, you know.

Nope......they sent him to that isolated post....and refused over and over to upgrade his protective detail......they wanted to hide what he was doing there.

 

[rightwinger]

While I absolutely agree with your assessment, and Jones himself recently testified in court (in order to get unsupervised access to his children) that he is not crazy, that's just a character he plays on the internet, you cannot discount the the number of posters just on this forum who spout his conspiracy theories and link to his bullshit website.

Look at the number of people just in this thread who are denying Sandy Hook happened.

Yep, there are still a few regulars that have yet to enrich this thread.
But in the main they are just harmless losers who burble away on obscure message boards and to their social workers.

But perhaps it is time for decent folk to make a stand. Pissing on the graves of slaughtered infants is surely not covered in any part of your constitution ?

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

Stevens? He asked for more prtotection...Hilary refused...no conspiracy there.....and then they lied about the attack.....no conspiracy there........

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

Republicans blocked funding then whined when it ended up getting Stevens killed

Hillary may have been unable to provide additional funding for one embassy....Republicans blocked funding for all of them

 

[2aguy]

Yep, there are still a few regulars that have yet to enrich this thread.
But in the main they are just harmless losers who burble away on obscure message boards and to their social workers.

But perhaps it is time for decent folk to make a stand. Pissing on the graves of slaughtered infants is surely not covered in any part of your constitution ?

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

Stevens? He asked for more prtotection...Hilary refused...no conspiracy there.....and then they lied about the attack.....no conspiracy there........

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

Where are you getting your mis-information? The Embassy had it's standard protection force. He left the embassy, you know.

The Washington Post....

State Dept. acknowledges rejecting requests for more security in Benghazi

The State Department acknowledged Wednesday that it rejected appeals for more security at its diplomatic posts in Libya in the months before a fatal terrorist attack in Benghazi as Republicans suggested that lapses contributed to the deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.

 

[2aguy]

Yep, there are still a few regulars that have yet to enrich this thread.
But in the main they are just harmless losers who burble away on obscure message boards and to their social workers.

But perhaps it is time for decent folk to make a stand. Pissing on the graves of slaughtered infants is surely not covered in any part of your constitution ?

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

Stevens? He asked for more prtotection...Hilary refused...no conspiracy there.....and then they lied about the attack.....no conspiracy there........

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

Republicans blocked funding then whined when it ended up getting Stevens killed

Hillary may have been unable to provide additional funding for one embassy....Republicans blocked funding for all of them

That is a lie......the democrats too see that one out to hide their culpability....

 

[Preacher]

What would be the point to a cover up anyway? Of all the conspiracy theories out there, this is the dumbest....

Dead kids tugs at people's heartstrings,should have been easy to ban guns after that....fortunately not. Its an obvious false flag just like Boston was.

 

[2aguy]

Yep, there are still a few regulars that have yet to enrich this thread.
But in the main they are just harmless losers who burble away on obscure message boards and to their social workers.

But perhaps it is time for decent folk to make a stand. Pissing on the graves of slaughtered infants is surely not covered in any part of your constitution ?

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

Stevens? He asked for more prtotection...Hilary refused...no conspiracy there.....and then they lied about the attack.....no conspiracy there........

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

Republicans blocked funding then whined when it ended up getting Stevens killed

Hillary may have been unable to provide additional funding for one embassy....Republicans blocked funding for all of them

That is a lie....


Fact-checking the Benghazi attacks

May 16, 2013: Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) suggested there was not enough security in Benghazi because Republicans had cut the budget for embassy security funding. But this claim was not credible and highly partisan. Democrats had also short-changed the State Department budget (compared to presidential requests), but funding for embassy security generally had increased significantly in recent years. Moreover, over the course of many hearings into the matter, State Department officials had told Congress that a lack of funds was not an issue. Instead, security was hampered because of bureaucratic issues and management failures. In other words, given the internal failures, no amount of money for the State Department likely would have made a difference in this tragedy. Boxer earned Three Pinocchios.

 

[rightwinger]

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

Stevens? He asked for more prtotection...Hilary refused...no conspiracy there.....and then they lied about the attack.....no conspiracy there........

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

Republicans blocked funding then whined when it ended up getting Stevens killed

Hillary may have been unable to provide additional funding for one embassy....Republicans blocked funding for all of them

That is a lie....


Fact-checking the Benghazi attacks

May 16, 2013: Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) suggested there was not enough security in Benghazi because Republicans had cut the budget for embassy security funding. But this claim was not credible and highly partisan. Democrats had also short-changed the State Department budget (compared to presidential requests), but funding for embassy security generally had increased significantly in recent years. Moreover, over the course of many hearings into the matter, State Department officials had told Congress that a lack of funds was not an issue. Instead, security was hampered because of bureaucratic issues and management failures. In other words, given the internal failures, no amount of money for the State Department likely would have made a difference in this tragedy. Boxer earned Three Pinocchios.

Needed to be increased more and Republicans blocked funding

Ambassador Stevens died as a result

 

[flacaltenn]

Merged 2 threads. 2nd starts about post #39...

 

[Pogo]

[
Wrong, Stupid. It's the UCR site. The Connecticut report of which reads, in the beginning (page 4):

​

That is NOT an FBI link.​

Correct. It's the UCR state source for the main stats page the poster dumped, which is why I identified it as such, and differentiated it from the "FBI link" she thought it was because she didn't bother to actually read it. And you posted the same UCR link, calling it the same erroneous "FBI link" because you're equally stupid.

Then later I posted an actual FBI link, noting that that (the second one) IS an actual FBI link, as opposed to the original, which was misidentified.

*BOTH* of which links adeptly melt y'alls Alex Jones conspiracy ball-of-tinfoil into a molten puddle of goo.

This zipping by too fast for ya or what?

 

[Pogo]

That's your own source proving you wrong, Dumbass. Linked, with page numbers. The link you posted is only a summary of what's reported from city and town jurisdictions, not state police, which handled Sandy Hook. And though I didn't use it, Snopes has also debunked this shit.

Snopes??? HAHAHA. Everyone knows they are govt agents. Their "explanation" of the FBI report that sandy hook didn't happen is to call it a "statistical anomaly.". HAHAHA

Once again for you in the cheap Illiterati seats --- Snopes was provided as an ADDITIONAL source blowing up the original premise, just in case the evidence in your own UCR link (renumbered post 50) and the authentic FBI report that I posted (renumbered post 56) that had already destroyed the complete fabrication of your OP, sailed over your reading comprehension dunce cap as it evidently did.

In other words the Snopes link is the *third* time you're proven to be a liar. It agrees with both the FBI report AND the UCR stats pages.

Meanwhile your "everybody knows" fallacy is ironical, since as also already noted, the bizzaro comic book fantasy you tried to sell amounts to "the government set up a hoax, and as my witness I call --- the government". If that isn't immediately recognized as a fatal paradox, please call the NIH and advise them on exactly what kind of hallucinogens you're spreading on your cereal these daze. K?

 

[MindWars]

Curious........what surfaced that they would protest?

Alex Jones calls Sandy Hook a hoax. Said it never happened.

MSM spewed lies about what Jones said or didn't say, the sheep prefer to believe the MSM whose getting caught lying left and right.

 

[2aguy]

Stevens? He asked for more prtotection...Hilary refused...no conspiracy there.....and then they lied about the attack.....no conspiracy there........

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

Republicans blocked funding then whined when it ended up getting Stevens killed

Hillary may have been unable to provide additional funding for one embassy....Republicans blocked funding for all of them

That is a lie....


Fact-checking the Benghazi attacks

May 16, 2013: Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) suggested there was not enough security in Benghazi because Republicans had cut the budget for embassy security funding. But this claim was not credible and highly partisan. Democrats had also short-changed the State Department budget (compared to presidential requests), but funding for embassy security generally had increased significantly in recent years. Moreover, over the course of many hearings into the matter, State Department officials had told Congress that a lack of funds was not an issue. Instead, security was hampered because of bureaucratic issues and management failures. In other words, given the internal failures, no amount of money for the State Department likely would have made a difference in this tragedy. Boxer earned Three Pinocchios.

Needed to be increased more and Republicans blocked funding

Ambassador Stevens died as a result

Read the Washington post link...you are lying about it.......which is not unusual,for you.....

 

[MindWars]

Jones remains skeptical about Sandy Hook

In a 20 minute ‘Final Statement on Sandy Hook’ in November of 2016, Jones lays out his evidence which he says calls into question the official report in the Sandy Hook massacre.

 

[Pogo]

You have a good point, it depends on the venue the weirdos are presented in. In the Trump home Alex Jones is welcomed as a comrade. As is the case on many online sites. An interview with Alex Jones or David Duke when presented to a group of 100 people that has 75 racist alt-right whackjobs in it certainly would trigger a different outcome than Alex Jones being interviewed, in all his batshit glory, on a major news network in the US, except of course Faux News which is a right wing propaganda outlet to begin with. They are in fact his comrades.

But such an interview viewed by the masses of Americans that aren't brainwashed like the alt-right, will simply show him for the loon he is.



You have to love the British.

Surely its just an act ? He makes a good living from acting like a twat, thats all it is.

While I absolutely agree with your assessment, and Jones himself recently testified in court (in order to get unsupervised access to his children) that he is not crazy, that's just a character he plays on the internet, you cannot discount the the number of posters just on this forum who spout his conspiracy theories and link to his bullshit website.

Look at the number of people just in this thread who are denying Sandy Hook happened.

Yep, there are still a few regulars that have yet to enrich this thread.
But in the main they are just harmless losers who burble away on obscure message boards and to their social workers.

But perhaps it is time for decent folk to make a stand. Pissing on the graves of slaughtered infants is surely not covered in any part of your constitution ?

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

And the anti-gunners were the first to politicize Sandy Hook...the blood hadn't cooled on the ground and they were pushing gun control......

Bullshit.

I remember this period vividly having joined USMB a few days prior. Gun violence was already the top issue, the date I joined falling right after the Jacksonville shooting, Jovan Belcher and teh Bob Costas MNF commentary, and just before Sandy Hook and Webster. ALL of these incidents went down in the space of less than a month. The burning question was gun violence, why it exists and what to do about it. That was already the burning issue when Adam Lanza loaded up, which then just intensified it.

Politicized it was, but it was y'all gun fetishists doing the politicizing with constant attacks on anybody who dared even broach the subject. Bob Costas was constantly vilified for a "gun control rant" even though he had said absolutely nothing about "gun control". The politicize pattern on USMB was this ---

"Bob Costas must be fired!"
"Piers Morgan must be deported!"
"David Gregory must be arrested!"
"The newspaper that published a list of firearms owners mus be run out of business!"

THAT was the politicization going on, a gaggle of fascist assholes trying to shut down all dialogue. I was here for it, it was in fact the issue I came here for. So don't you DARE try to revise this shabby infamy into its own opposite Jocko. I know better.

 

[2aguy]

Surely its just an act ? He makes a good living from acting like a twat, thats all it is.

While I absolutely agree with your assessment, and Jones himself recently testified in court (in order to get unsupervised access to his children) that he is not crazy, that's just a character he plays on the internet, you cannot discount the the number of posters just on this forum who spout his conspiracy theories and link to his bullshit website.

Look at the number of people just in this thread who are denying Sandy Hook happened.

Yep, there are still a few regulars that have yet to enrich this thread.
But in the main they are just harmless losers who burble away on obscure message boards and to their social workers.

But perhaps it is time for decent folk to make a stand. Pissing on the graves of slaughtered infants is surely not covered in any part of your constitution ?

I believe it's covered under "freedom of speech" in the Constitution, so yes, you can piss on anyone's grave and receive Constitutional protection.

Many victim families have begged Conservatives to stop politicizing the deaths of their loved one: the families of US Ambassador Stevens, Vince Foster, Seth Rich immediately spring to mind. And their requests have fallen on deaf ears.

I hope the Rich family sues, which they have threatened to do.

And the anti-gunners were the first to politicize Sandy Hook...the blood hadn't cooled on the ground and they were pushing gun control......

Bullshit.

I remember this period vividly having joined USMB a few days prior. Gun violence was already the top issue, the date I joined falling right after the Jacksonville shooting, Jovan Belcher and teh Bob Costas MNF commentary, and just before Sandy Hook and Webster. ALL of these incidents went down in the space of less than a month. The burning question was gun violence, why it exists and what to do about it. That was already the burning issue when Adam Lanza loaded up, which then just intensified it.

Politicized it was, but it was y'all gun fetishists doing the politicizing with constant attacks on anybody who dared even broach the subject. Bob Costas was constantly vilified for a "gun control rant" even though he had said absolutely nothing about "gun control". The politicize pattern on USMB was this ---

"Bob Costas must be fired!"
"Piers Morgan must be deported!"
"David Gregory must be arrested!"
"The newspaper that published a list of firearms owners mus be run out of business!"

THAT was the politicization going on, a gaggle of fascist assholes trying to shut down all dialogue. I was here for it, it was in fact the issue I came here for. So don't you DARE try to revise this shabby infamy into its own opposite Jocko. I know better.

No dipshit......every shooting and the blood wouldn't be dry and assholes like you would be calling for rifle and magazine bans......you morons started it...you used any attack to ban the millions of guns from people who committed no crime...and the facts, the truth and reality show that all of your gun control myths are based on zero reality.

 

[rightwinger]

State Department asked for additional funding to protect our embassies
Republicans blocked the funding

That is a lie....there was no funding issue...and Hilary and Obama sent him to a country with no central government without a platoon of marines......the usual embassy protection force......

Republicans blocked funding then whined when it ended up getting Stevens killed

Hillary may have been unable to provide additional funding for one embassy....Republicans blocked funding for all of them

That is a lie....


Fact-checking the Benghazi attacks

May 16, 2013: Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) suggested there was not enough security in Benghazi because Republicans had cut the budget for embassy security funding. But this claim was not credible and highly partisan. Democrats had also short-changed the State Department budget (compared to presidential requests), but funding for embassy security generally had increased significantly in recent years. Moreover, over the course of many hearings into the matter, State Department officials had told Congress that a lack of funds was not an issue. Instead, security was hampered because of bureaucratic issues and management failures. In other words, given the internal failures, no amount of money for the State Department likely would have made a difference in this tragedy. Boxer earned Three Pinocchios.

Needed to be increased more and Republicans blocked funding

Ambassador Stevens died as a result

Read the Washington post link...you are lying about it.......which is not unusual,for you.....

The blood of Benghazi is on the hands of the Republicans

Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security: 'You Have To Prioritize Things' | HuffPost