Partisan

Edgetho

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2012
15,821
7,076
Washington Post Hails Confirmation of Loretta Lynch as "First Black Woman" to be AG;
Headlined Confirmation of First Black Woman to Be Secretary of State: "Condoleeza Rice Confirmed Amid Criticism"

—Ace

Anybody shocked that Pravda West, aka; the WaPo would do something like that?

People, there is social justice, there is legal justice and there is another kind of Justice.

One that is encoded in our DNA. One that, when.... Not 'if' but 'when' (if things keep going the way they are) that Justice is served up, nobody is going to like it very much.

A Free Press is an absolute necessity for a Free People.

We don't have one

Racial Milestones and a Corrupt Press National Review Online

Racial Milestones and a Corrupt Press



You can do this all day, I know, play “What if a Republican had done . . . ” But the contrast is so galling, it simply must be noted. Today’s Washington Post carries a story about the confirmation of Loretta Lynch as attorney general. The inside headline, on page A7, proclaims “Lynch Will Be First Black Woman to Head the Justice Department.” A glance back at the coverage of Condoleeza Rice’s confirmation as the first black woman Secretary of State?

The Washington Post headline was “Rice Confirmed Amid Criticism.” The story accompanying that headline featured Democrats’ slams against attorney general-nominee Alberto Gonzalez, but not a word about the history-making moment of confirming the first black woman secretary of state. This tears the veil off the “first blah blahs” the press and Democrats make such a fuss over. It’s completely partisan. It has nothing to do with true pride in the accomplishments of once oppressed peoples. Conservative women’s accomplishments are illegitimate. Black conservatives are invisible. When Tim Scott was elected as the first black senator to represent a state from the former Confederacy — there was radio silence from the media. Had he been a Democrat, his election would have been a national sensation. Disgusting.

Edge:
When people start to think they are being mistreated, abused, lied to, under-represented, robbed and generally treated like shit --

Bad things happen. And it won't take much to trigger it.

Mark my words. Even dimocraps better hope a Republican wins in 2016.

You better hope
 
Tell me Edge, what would your story and headline have been about Lynch's confirmation?
 
Black Conservatives (i.e., think for themselves) are such an anathema to the Liberal dogma of social injustice (i.e., racial inferiority) that they have to be smeared and ostracized from public discourse.
 
Black Conservatives (i.e., think for themselves) are such an anathema to the Liberal dogma of social injustice (i.e., racial inferiority) that they have to be smeared and ostracized from public discourse.
For real?
 
Partisan?

On November 16, 2004, Bush nominated Rice to be Secretary of State. On January 26, 2005, the Senate confirmed her nomination by a vote of 85-13.

On November 8, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Lynch for the position of U.S. Attorney General, On April 23, 2015, appointment was confirmed the a 56 to 43 vote

Condoleezza Rice s tenure as Secretary of State - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Was that supposed to have relevance? The fact is that when Bush appointed the first black female SecState the headline didnt mention it at all. When Obama appointed the first black female AG the Post trumpeted the fact.
Bias anyone?
 
Partisan?

On November 16, 2004, Bush nominated Rice to be Secretary of State. On January 26, 2005, the Senate confirmed her nomination by a vote of 85-13.

On November 8, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Lynch for the position of U.S. Attorney General, On April 23, 2015, appointment was confirmed the a 56 to 43 vote

Condoleezza Rice s tenure as Secretary of State - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Was that supposed to have relevance? The fact is that when Bush appointed the first black female SecState the headline didnt mention it at all. When Obama appointed the first black female AG the Post trumpeted the fact.
Bias anyone?

One of those had large bipartisan support. The other didn't.

One of those nominations was held up due to a strictly partisan matter.

The Washington Post can print what they want.
 
Partisan?

On November 16, 2004, Bush nominated Rice to be Secretary of State. On January 26, 2005, the Senate confirmed her nomination by a vote of 85-13.

On November 8, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Lynch for the position of U.S. Attorney General, On April 23, 2015, appointment was confirmed the a 56 to 43 vote

Condoleezza Rice s tenure as Secretary of State - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Was that supposed to have relevance? The fact is that when Bush appointed the first black female SecState the headline didnt mention it at all. When Obama appointed the first black female AG the Post trumpeted the fact.
Bias anyone?

One of those had large bipartisan support. The other didn't.

One of those nominations was held up due to a strictly partisan matter.

The Washington Post can print what they want.
You're still failing to make a case of any kind. Both got confirmed. Bush's choice was confirmed overwhelmingly, because she was a good pick. Obama's choice had a slightly more lopsided vote. Because she is a poor choice. The fact that the vote was delayed on a procedural matter having nothing to do with her is irrelevant.
 
Partisan?

On November 16, 2004, Bush nominated Rice to be Secretary of State. On January 26, 2005, the Senate confirmed her nomination by a vote of 85-13.

On November 8, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Lynch for the position of U.S. Attorney General, On April 23, 2015, appointment was confirmed the a 56 to 43 vote

Condoleezza Rice s tenure as Secretary of State - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Was that supposed to have relevance? The fact is that when Bush appointed the first black female SecState the headline didnt mention it at all. When Obama appointed the first black female AG the Post trumpeted the fact.
Bias anyone?

One of those had large bipartisan support. The other didn't.

One of those nominations was held up due to a strictly partisan matter.

The Washington Post can print what they want.

You're still failing to make a case of any kind. Both got confirmed. Bush's choice was confirmed overwhelmingly, because she was a good pick. Obama's choice had a slightly more lopsided vote. Because she is a poor choice. The fact that the vote was delayed on a procedural matter having nothing to do with her is irrelevant.

So I guess you think you've proven how bad a choice Clarence Thomas was.
 
Partisan?

On November 16, 2004, Bush nominated Rice to be Secretary of State. On January 26, 2005, the Senate confirmed her nomination by a vote of 85-13.

On November 8, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Lynch for the position of U.S. Attorney General, On April 23, 2015, appointment was confirmed the a 56 to 43 vote

Condoleezza Rice s tenure as Secretary of State - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Was that supposed to have relevance? The fact is that when Bush appointed the first black female SecState the headline didnt mention it at all. When Obama appointed the first black female AG the Post trumpeted the fact.
Bias anyone?

One of those had large bipartisan support. The other didn't.

One of those nominations was held up due to a strictly partisan matter.

The Washington Post can print what they want.
You're still failing to make a case of any kind. Both got confirmed. Bush's choice was confirmed overwhelmingly, because she was a good pick. Obama's choice had a slightly more lopsided vote. Because she is a poor choice. The fact that the vote was delayed on a procedural matter having nothing to do with her is irrelevant.

A poor choice that was confirmed unanimously twice before by the Senate. It was delayed by historic proportions strictly due to partisan bickering.
 
Partisan?

On November 16, 2004, Bush nominated Rice to be Secretary of State. On January 26, 2005, the Senate confirmed her nomination by a vote of 85-13.

On November 8, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Lynch for the position of U.S. Attorney General, On April 23, 2015, appointment was confirmed the a 56 to 43 vote

Condoleezza Rice s tenure as Secretary of State - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Was that supposed to have relevance? The fact is that when Bush appointed the first black female SecState the headline didnt mention it at all. When Obama appointed the first black female AG the Post trumpeted the fact.
Bias anyone?

One of those had large bipartisan support. The other didn't.

One of those nominations was held up due to a strictly partisan matter.

The Washington Post can print what they want.

You're still failing to make a case of any kind. Both got confirmed. Bush's choice was confirmed overwhelmingly, because she was a good pick. Obama's choice had a slightly more lopsided vote. Because she is a poor choice. The fact that the vote was delayed on a procedural matter having nothing to do with her is irrelevant.

So I guess you think you've proven how bad a choice Clarence Thomas was.
You guess wrong.
Next.
 
Partisan?

On November 16, 2004, Bush nominated Rice to be Secretary of State. On January 26, 2005, the Senate confirmed her nomination by a vote of 85-13.

On November 8, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Lynch for the position of U.S. Attorney General, On April 23, 2015, appointment was confirmed the a 56 to 43 vote

Condoleezza Rice s tenure as Secretary of State - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Loretta Lynch - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Was that supposed to have relevance? The fact is that when Bush appointed the first black female SecState the headline didnt mention it at all. When Obama appointed the first black female AG the Post trumpeted the fact.
Bias anyone?

One of those had large bipartisan support. The other didn't.

One of those nominations was held up due to a strictly partisan matter.

The Washington Post can print what they want.
You're still failing to make a case of any kind. Both got confirmed. Bush's choice was confirmed overwhelmingly, because she was a good pick. Obama's choice had a slightly more lopsided vote. Because she is a poor choice. The fact that the vote was delayed on a procedural matter having nothing to do with her is irrelevant.

A poor choice that was confirmed unanimously twice before by the Senate. It was delayed by historic proportions strictly due to partisan bickering.
Attorney General of the US is a different position. SHe is a woman with zero Washington experience. And we see how that generally works out. Holder had been Assistant AG so he had experience. He knew what he was doing. He is a criminal, but an effective one. This woman is from out in left field. She will be of the same caliber as John Eff Kerry, Jack Lew, adn the other nothing yes-men pub dupes Obama has appointed.
 
Tell me Edge, what would your story and headline have been about Lynch's confirmation?

"First n*gger woman confirmed to be AG. Race war imminent?" :lol:
"Loud mouth negress confirmed as AG. Are whites in danger?"
You both forgot to include 'dimocrap' and 'scum'. Edge is a true intellectual, you can tell by his vocabulary usage.
He calls 'em like he sees 'em. And he's right almost all of the time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top