Parts of Georgia Grand Jury's Trump Report Released.

[Delldude]

Perhaps you simply don't recall Bush's rationale for invading Iraq? He itemized specific WMDs, not under U.N. seal, of which he claimed Hussein was in possession as the main reason for invading. "Turned out he [Hussein] didn't" have them. Your own articles even said that.

Why was it the CIA claimed Saddam didn't know he had them then?
You better do some research.

 

[0311]

So we don’t have a right to object to votes? And elections? Hmm

Yes, but after losing the Election you do not get spread unfounded and unsupported of Election Fraud/Voter Fraud if you do not evidence to support such outrageous claims.

Unlike crimes like murder, where a person can be found guilty without a body, fraud especially Election Fraud/Voter Fraud you have to have material evidence to support the charge.

After 60+cases alleging Election Fraud/Voter Fraud being tossed for lack of evidence, after over 2-Years of alleging such fraud, without material evidence of such fraud you should crying about something that did not happen and accept the loss.

 

[Faun]

Why was it the CIA claimed Saddam didn't know he had them then?
You better do some research.

I've done the research...

"... the main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn’t, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction." ~ George Bush, 8.21.2006​

 

[Delldude]

I've done the research...

"... the main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn’t, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction." ~ George Bush, 8.21.2006​

LOL....yeah, you can tell.....LOL

 

[Faun]

LOL....yeah, you can tell.....LOL

Well who knows better than the man who had access to all the Intel back then?

 

[Delldude]

Well who knows better than the man who had access to all the Intel back then?

Tell him he's overlooked or wasn't copied in on all the intel back then.

 

[theHawk]

It was learned they have recommended a wide range of charges against many people.

Link of actual charges then.

 

[theHawk]

Perhaps you simply don't recall Bush's rationale for invading Iraq? He itemized specific WMDs, not under U.N. seal, of which he claimed Hussein was in possession as the main reason for invading. "Turned out he [Hussein] didn't" have them. Your own articles even said that.

The lying Deep State claimed the WMD was there. If Gore was President he would had invaded too. So would had Hillary.

The same Deep State that decided we needed to bomb the Libyan government out of existence, and Obama complied.

The same Deep State that lied about chemical weapons attack in Syria.

The same Deep State that has you lefties and neocons cheering for war against Russia.

 

[theHawk]

Because, despite your love for the orange slob, he is not special.

Also, to demonstrate his innocence. Duh.

If he is not special then why are lefties obsessed with charging him with bogus accusations? You all are terrified of him.

 

[Kilroy2]

If it was under oath you have to assume it was truth.
Unless you have something to the contrary, where obviously they didn't.

Contradictory statements made by different people would indicate that someone lied. Any number of things from previous statements or written communications can indicate that it was a lie that someone told the Grand Jury. Still the big thing is a statement that the foreperson of the grand jury has said.

The foreperson of the Atlanta-based grand jury that investigated former President Donald Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election told CNN on Tuesday that the panel is recommending multiple indictments and suggested “the big name” may be on the list.

hmm who can that be?

Still it would be fun to know exactly what evidence there is that the big guy lied and how can they proof it beyond a reasonable doubt. Well, his supporters will never believe it but its not up to them in a court of law.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Link of actual charges then.

What an odd request. Please read more slowly.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If he is not special then why are lefties obsessed with charging him with bogus accusations?

That isn't happening. That is embarrassing cult fantasy.

 

[Delldude]

The foreperson of the Atlanta-based grand jury that investigated former President Donald Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election told CNN on Tuesday that the panel is recommending multiple indictments and suggested “the big name” may be on the list.

Emily Kohrs is probably damaging any case coming out of the investigation.....let her keep flapping her gums.

Still it would be fun to know exactly what evidence there is that the big guy lied and how can they proof it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Whether or not anything is prosecutable is the big if.

 

[Kilroy2]

Emily Kohrs is probably damaging any case coming out of the investigation.....let her keep flapping her gums.



Whether or not anything is prosecutable is the big if.

Well , his supporters will still support him, people on the fence will stay there, and people who do not like him will just be dancing in the street.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Whether or not anything is prosecutable is the big if.

Not really. The grand jury recommending criminal charges removes that doubt.

 

[Delldude]

Not really. The grand jury recommending criminal charges removes that doubt.

No it doesn't. The AG has to make that final determination.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No it doesn't. The AG has to make that final determination.

Oh, I think it does remove doubt that at least something is prosecutable. Definitely.

 

[Delldude]

Oh, I think it does remove doubt that at least something is prosecutable. Definitely.

Like the AG said 'there may be criminal intent'...............

Doesn't sound so sure.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Like the AG said 'there may be criminal intent'...............

Doesn't sound so sure.

Oops, you forgot to date your quote that you made up.

 

[Faun]

Tell him he's overlooked or wasn't copied in on all the intel back then.

Why should I lie to him?