Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Suck on it.
warrior102 is that you???.
The cons/teapartiers must be soo happy that you welched on your wager and returned to the board.
As to the OP, STILL only opinions from you people.Better you concede now than get MORE egg on your face
Suck on it.
warrior102 is that you???.
The cons/teapartiers must be soo happy that you welched on your wager and returned to the board.
As to the OP, STILL only opinions from you people.
Are you butt hurt that he came back? So what? Just suck it up and move on, dot.
Libs are always trying to silence the competition, that's just the way you folks roll.
I think I'll rep the guy for coming back
a welching, welcher extroadinaire is another matter
warrior102 is that you???.
The cons/teapartiers must be soo happy that you welched on your wager and returned to the board.
As to the OP, STILL only opinions from you people.
Are you butt hurt that he came back? So what? Just suck it up and move on, dot.
Libs are always trying to silence the competition, that's just the way you folks roll.
I think I'll rep the guy for coming back
the guy doesn't bring much if anything to the board. at least I provide sources, yes- sometimes even Fox, to support my positions. Guys like him just holler from the peanut gallery & get "thanked" by the people who only share his ideology NOT the merits of his yammerings.
what the repub-voting hive mind keep glossing over is that 85% +/- people have HC already through their employer.Why do they keep glossing over that fact?
warrior102 is that you???.
The cons/teapartiers must be soo happy that you welched on your wager and returned to the board.
As to the OP, STILL only opinions from you people.
Are you butt hurt that he came back? So what? Just suck it up and move on, dot.
Libs are always trying to silence the competition, that's just the way you folks roll.
I think I'll rep the guy for coming back
the guy doesn't bring much if anything to the board. at least I provide sources, yes- sometimes even Fox, to support my positions. Guys like him just holler from the peanut gallery & get "thanked" by the people who only share his ideology NOT the merits of his yammerings.
Why does everyone continue to discuss this issue as if "healthcare" had actually been addressed?
The only thing that has changed is how people get their insurance, not the healthcare industry itself...
warrior102 is that you???.
The cons/teapartiers must be soo happy that you welched on your wager and returned to the board.
As to the OP, STILL only opinions from you people.
Are you butt hurt that he came back? So what? Just suck it up and move on, dot.
Libs are always trying to silence the competition, that's just the way you folks roll.
I think I'll rep the guy for coming back
the guy doesn't bring much if anything to the board. at least I provide sources, yes- sometimes even Fox, to support my positions. Guys like him just holler from the peanut gallery & get "thanked" by the people who only share his ideology NOT the merits of his yammerings.
Why does everyone continue to discuss this issue as if "healthcare" had actually been addressed?
The only thing that has changed is how people get their insurance, not the healthcare industry itself...
Krugman is a very wise man:
Unacceptable Realities
(snip)
The hysteria over Obamacare is being well documented, of course; Sahil Kapurs piece on Obamacare McCarthyism the instant purging of any Republican who offers any hint of accommodation to the law of the land is getting a lot of well-deserved attention. One thing Kapur doesnt emphasize, however, is what I see a lot in my inbox (and in my reading): the furious insistence that nothing resembling a government guarantee of health insurance can possibly work.
Thats a curious belief to hold, given the fact that every other advanced country has such a guarantee, and that we ourselves have a 45-year-old single-payer system for seniors that has worked pretty well all this time. But nothing makes these people as angry as the suggestion that Obamacare might actually prove workable.
Why does everyone continue to discuss this issue as if "healthcare" had actually been addressed?
The only thing that has changed is how people get their insurance, not the healthcare industry itself...
Why does everyone continue to discuss this issue as if "healthcare" had actually been addressed?
The only thing that has changed is how people get their insurance, not the healthcare industry itself...
One must FIRST establish control how it is paid for, once that is established everything else falls into line.
But you are right, what we are seeing is the single greatest sleight of hand EVER perpetrated on an unsuspecting public.
Your second sentence contradicts your first sentence. just sayin.....yep, its not the big socialist takeover that a certain network was predicting.
Why does everyone continue to discuss this issue as if "healthcare" had actually been addressed?
The only thing that has changed is how people get their insurance, not the healthcare industry itself...
The problem is that the industry had to change the requirements of healthcare coverage to what was mandated by the government. Hence, millions of people were dropped from their coverage that they liked, others had premiums rise considerably along with deductibles.
Exemptions for some and not for others by the stroke of EO pen.
This isn't just about those who weren't insured getting insured, it's about a takeover of an industry......a trail to single payer being built brick by brick.
).
Overall, three-quarters of the people with a medically-related bankruptcy had health insurance, they say.
"That was actually the predominant problem in patients in our study -- 78 percent of them had health insurance, but many of them were bankrupted anyway because there were gaps in their coverage like co-payments and deductibles and uncovered services," says Woolhandler.
yep, its not the big socialist takeover that a certain network was predicting.
that wonderful "coverage" that people had to drop resulted in this:
Medical bills prompt more than 60 percent of U.S. bankruptcies - CNN.com
Overall, three-quarters of the people with a medically-related bankruptcy had health insurance, they say.
"That was actually the predominant problem in patients in our study -- 78 percent of them had health insurance, but many of them were bankrupted anyway because there were gaps in their coverage like co-payments and deductibles and uncovered services," says Woolhandler.
that wonderful "coverage", extolled by rw media, that people had to drop resulted in this
Medical bills prompt more than 60 percent of U.S. bankruptcies - CNN.com
Overall, three-quarters of the people with a medically-related bankruptcy had health insurance, they say.
"That was actually the predominant problem in patients in our study -- 78 percent of them had health insurance, but many of them were bankrupted anyway because there were gaps in their coverage like co-payments and deductibles and uncovered services," says Woolhandler.
Bankruptcies resulting from unpaid medical bills will affect nearly 2 million people this year—making health care the No. 1 cause of such filings, and outpacing bankruptcies due to credit-card bills or unpaid mortgages, according to new data. And even having health insurance doesn't buffer consumers against financial hardship.
