Pay-To-Play? NO! Decisions Clinton Made on Behalf of Foundation Donors Was Just 'COINCIDENCE'!

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,150
"This is getting tedious. Every day more evidence appears showing that Hillary Clinton lied or broke laws and every time we are told: “It can’t be proven.”
Perhaps, but some things need no proof. Clinton has admitted that she used a private server to handle her communications as secretary of state.
She kept, sent and received classified information on an unapproved device. She hired private companies that had no security clearance to manage the server.
Destroying public records is a crime and Clinton decided, entirely on her own, which public records would be preserved, and which would be destroyed.
Among the federal records she destroyed were documents under subpoena. Amazingly, her attorneys with no security clearance were complicit in the destruction of those records.
The law she broke does not require intent and during her interview with the FBI Clinton was not asked about intent. But the FBI chose not to bring all of this to a grand jury because they determined that she lacked intent.
There is no proof that she used her office for financial gain either. But thousands of people in the U.S. are in jail for having been convicted of crimes on circumstantial evidence."

NOW a mountain of evidence continues to be exposed about how Hillary used the State Department as a branch of the Clinton Foundation:

"Irish billionaire Dennis O’Brien owns 94 percent of telecom company, Digicel. In September of 2010, just weeks after Digicel applied for millions of dollars in State Department grants, Bill Clinton gave a speech in Dublin for Digicel. Clinton was not paid, but O’Brien personally donated between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation between 2010 and 2011.
A few weeks after the September 2010 speech in Ireland, Clinton was paid $225,000 for a Digicel-sponsored speech in Kingston, Jamaica. Two months later Digicel received its first installment of what ultimately was millions in USAID grant money.
Digicel was also granted by the USAID Food for Peace program, which was under the direct control of Hillary Clinton’s top aide Cheryl Mills, the lucrative cell phone concession for personal money transfers in Haiti."
The Swedish gov’t asked the State Department for relief from Iran sanctions on humanitarian grounds. They argued that their many Iranian expatriates wished to speak by cell phone to their relatives in Iran.
Ericsson, a Swedish telecom giant, installed cell towers in Iran.
Just weeks after the State Department gave a waiver of Iran sanctions, Ericsson hired Bill Clinton to give a speech for $750,000. They had not hired him for a speech before this and have not hired him since.
The Clinton Foundation opened up a branch in Sweden which was the recipient of $26 million.
...and so much more.

And liberal sheep follow and defend her by continuing to parrot her insane excuse: 'Its all just COINCIDENCE!"

:haha:


HILLARY IS NOT EVEN IN OFFICE YET BUT IS ALREADY COMPETING WITH BARRY OVER THE TITLE OF 'MOST LAWLESS ADMINISTRATION IS US HISTORY'!

Of Course Decisions Clinton Made on Behalf of Foundation Donors Was Just Coincidence
 
On the one hand, you're right, on the other hand, you're just in the opposing flock and you're all alike, which is what as a society we're stuck where we are.

Gee, I wonder who benefits from the pathological dysfunction.
 
*YAWN*
yawning.jpg
 
On the one hand you are right, on the other hand, you are right, easy. While the Obama regime is doing every thing they can to keep her mess from getting in the way, it hasn't been lost on American voters that she is a lying, scheming, tyrant.

Interestingly, Clinton’s numbers appear to have dropped since that early August poll mostly in groups that have been very supportive of her:

Her favorable rating among women dropped from 54 percent to just 45 percent.
Among Hispanics, it went from 71 percent to 55 percent
Among liberals, it went from 76 percent to 63 percent
 
Pay-To-Play? NO! Decisions Clinton Made on Behalf of Foundation Donors Was Just 'COINCIDENCE'!

Easilyfooled65 at it again. There is absolutely no evidence of that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top