So, Hillary Clinton Was Cheated

Well, since that happened in 1998, you might need to reconsider.
trump-donaldtrump.gif


What presidential election was held in 1998, hmm? :rolleyes-41:
 
/——/ Clinton paid $850,000 to settle the lawsuit brought against him in 1994. It was settled in 1998. DERP
It’s still not the same given the settlement was public. Hush money is secret, meant to keep the story secret. A settlement just makes the lawsuit go away.
 
skewy...if trump comes out of this looking good,will you still be here or will you run and hide?....

And when he doesn't, where will you be?

And when he loses in a landslide in November, and has no more campaigns to run, and is bled dry by legal fees and fines. Will you be starting a commune for wayward magats with no life, in the jungle somewhere while you await dear leaders release?

You do know that you're the one totally on defense here right?
 
/——/ Clinton paid $850,000 to settle the lawsuit brought against him in 1994. It was settled in 1998. DERP
Right, long after the election. Like I said.

A legal settlement long after the election versus an illegally handled hush money payment just before the election, with the crimes also occuring while Trump was President.

See if you can spot the differences, professor.
 
Right, long after the election. Like I said.

A legal settlement long after the election versus an illegally handled hush money payment just before the election, with the crimes also occuring while Trump was President.

See if you can spot the differences, professor.
No crimes, Shitlord. I guess you're oblivious to the absolute hypocrisy, huh?

Btw, that was a real rape, and there were others, too.

Hillary had some of them and witnesses killed.
 
The core allegation is that this is a felony because Donald Trump lied to cover up a kind of election fraud. He sought to keep his dirty laundry out of public because it threatened to torpedo his presidential campaign. But “election interference” is very hard to sell because Donald Trump himself has been whining about “election interference” for years. And the federal DC case is also about election interference (although of a much more direct and violent sort).

The fraudulent business records covered up “hush money payments” to “porn stars”. So, many in the media call this trial the “hush money payments” trial or just the “hush money” trial, even though paying someone to keep quiet is (bizarrely) legal.

All of these attempts miss the point. It’s not like the MSM is trying to bury the lede (ha, ha), but the entire portent of this trial is what a conviction tells us:

Very, very likely if the public knew about the payments, Hillary Clinton would have won the 2016 presidential election.

That is, this trial almost certainly will prove that Hillary Clinton was (almost certainly) cheated.



Be glad election interference isn't another felony on the list for you today donny.

It really wasn't that big of a secret. Ray Charles could have seen it and he was dead. That said, to me this should be a straight-forward tax fraud case not a bunch of trumped up political conspiracy theory election nonsense. Put me on the jury on the tax fraud and you get a guilty; put me on it for the election nonsense and you get a not guilty.
 
And when he doesn't, where will you be?

And when he loses in a landslide in November, and has no more campaigns to run, and is bled dry by legal fees and fines. Will you be starting a commune for wayward magats with no life, in the jungle somewhere while you await dear leaders release?

You do know that you're the one totally on defense here right?
i will be right here skewy.....unlike you i dont let 2 old fuckers who both are losing it affect my life...
 

Forum List

Back
Top