Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I posted a video of the victims interview.I do not do face-book-----what does the victim say about the attack?
who said it was legal?you have anything on the PERP with the POLE?
Very little information is availiable on the pole pummeling perp.
probably will never will be....... its been trivialized to a minor misdemeanor-----on its
way to being dismissed
That's essentially what it is - if the woman hadn't been muslim no one would have cared.
No one would have cared? GOOD-----it is not only legal ----now no one cares
oh---where? ????I posted a video of the victims interview.I do not do face-book-----what does the victim say about the attack?
we need to settle more muslims in the Redneck Riviera (the Fla panhandle)I posted a video of the victims interview.I do not do face-book-----what does the victim say about the attack?
and if there's one thing we've established it's that you're a hateful woman with an active imagination.source?we don't know any facts that would make it a hate crimemocked? also from what we know now it wasnt a hate crime
I did not keep up-----what do we know now that
demonstrates that it was not a hate crime
(more like an act of love?)
Long ago-----in 2001-----the police stations of the city of New York were being BESIEGED with complaints by women in hijabs-----the complaint being "someone pulled on my veil"---------no witnesses and no damage. These complaints were recorded as "hate crimes" ---and so reported in "stats". There were thousands of such unwitnessed events
I am the source-----I was working with members of the police department at the
time and with "the public" ----to wit, I was there.
That's the story we're being told by the victim.who said it was legal?Very little information is availiable on the pole pummeling perp.
probably will never will be....... its been trivialized to a minor misdemeanor-----on its
way to being dismissed
That's essentially what it is - if the woman hadn't been muslim no one would have cared.
No one would have cared? GOOD-----it is not only legal ----now no one cares
a person hiding her identity-----emerged from a wooded area and ATTACKED a person on her own property with a WEAPON------that is not
"simple assault". Simple assault is a shove or a slap
and if there's one thing we've established it's that you're a hateful woman with an active imagination.source?we don't know any facts that would make it a hate crimeI did not keep up-----what do we know now that
demonstrates that it was not a hate crime
(more like an act of love?)
Long ago-----in 2001-----the police stations of the city of New York were being BESIEGED with complaints by women in hijabs-----the complaint being "someone pulled on my veil"---------no witnesses and no damage. These complaints were recorded as "hate crimes" ---and so reported in "stats". There were thousands of such unwitnessed events
I am the source-----I was working with members of the police department at the
time and with "the public" ----to wit, I was there.
not exactly credible in other words
you and i are 'we'and if there's one thing we've established it's that you're a hateful woman with an active imagination.source?we don't know any facts that would make it a hate crime
Long ago-----in 2001-----the police stations of the city of New York were being BESIEGED with complaints by women in hijabs-----the complaint being "someone pulled on my veil"---------no witnesses and no damage. These complaints were recorded as "hate crimes" ---and so reported in "stats". There were thousands of such unwitnessed events
I am the source-----I was working with members of the police department at the
time and with "the public" ----to wit, I was there.
not exactly credible in other words
who is "we" ? you and Malcolm X?
I have more information for you-----Elijah
Muhummad really did murder Malcolm.
That's the story we're being told by the victim.who said it was legal?probably will never will be....... its been trivialized to a minor misdemeanor-----on its
way to being dismissed
That's essentially what it is - if the woman hadn't been muslim no one would have cared.
No one would have cared? GOOD-----it is not only legal ----now no one cares
a person hiding her identity-----emerged from a wooded area and ATTACKED a person on her own property with a WEAPON------that is not
"simple assault". Simple assault is a shove or a slap
the attacker will be charged with what they can prove
you and is 'we'and if there's one thing we've established it's that you're a hateful woman with an active imagination.source?Long ago-----in 2001-----the police stations of the city of New York were being BESIEGED with complaints by women in hijabs-----the complaint being "someone pulled on my veil"---------no witnesses and no damage. These complaints were recorded as "hate crimes" ---and so reported in "stats". There were thousands of such unwitnessed events
I am the source-----I was working with members of the police department at the
time and with "the public" ----to wit, I was there.
not exactly credible in other words
who is "we" ? you and Malcolm X?
I have more information for you-----Elijah
Muhummad really did murder Malcolm.
actually, you're the one proving it, i just point it out
fixed. sorry.you and is 'we'and if there's one thing we've established it's that you're a hateful woman with an active imagination.source?
I am the source-----I was working with members of the police department at the
time and with "the public" ----to wit, I was there.
not exactly credible in other words
who is "we" ? you and Malcolm X?
I have more information for you-----Elijah
Muhummad really did murder Malcolm.
actually, you're the one proving it, i just point it out
your sentence is gibberish
nothing new thereBurka-clad stranger attacks woman with American flag
Heres another link, dont know if this was already posted
Somewhere in this thread.oh---where? ????I posted a video of the victims interview.I do not do face-book-----what does the victim say about the attack?
the victim's facebook page features a confederate rag and a support for banning muslims.This woman doesnt appear to me to overtly be a racist, the woman was not a neighbor, she was a stranger who appeared and other neighbors had to help hold her down.
I'm calling this woman either crazy, or brainwashed into hating America
Here it is again.oh---where? ????I posted a video of the victims interview.I do not do face-book-----what does the victim say about the attack?
who said it was legal?Very little information is availiable on the pole pummeling perp.
probably will never will be....... its been trivialized to a minor misdemeanor-----on its
way to being dismissed
That's essentially what it is - if the woman hadn't been muslim no one would have cared.
No one would have cared? GOOD-----it is not only legal ----now no one cares
a person hiding her identity-----emerged from a wooded area and ATTACKED a person on her own property with a WEAPON------that is not
"simple assault". Simple assault is a shove or a slap
and that you are a racist bigot!and if there's one thing we've established it's that you're a hateful woman with an active imagination.source?we don't know any facts that would make it a hate crimeI did not keep up-----what do we know now that
demonstrates that it was not a hate crime
(more like an act of love?)
Long ago-----in 2001-----the police stations of the city of New York were being BESIEGED with complaints by women in hijabs-----the complaint being "someone pulled on my veil"---------no witnesses and no damage. These complaints were recorded as "hate crimes" ---and so reported in "stats". There were thousands of such unwitnessed events
I am the source-----I was working with members of the police department at the
time and with "the public" ----to wit, I was there.
not exactly credible in other words