Peer-Reviewed Study Says Mysterious, Unidentified Nano-Structures in COVID Vaccines Are Real

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
4,821
8,134
2,130
The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research is mainstream science.


Peer-Reviewed Study Says Mysterious, Unidentified Nano-Structures in COVID Vaccines Are Real

abour-1.png

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla and strange self-assembling metallic structures found in Pfizer and Moderna


Peer-Reviewed Study Says Mysterious, Unidentified Nano-Structures in COVID Vaccines Are Real


Whatever informed consent means, no one gave informed consent to have self-assembling nano-robots injected into their bodies. As such Pfizer and Moderna seem to have clearly violated the Nuremberg Code, which put Nazi doctors after World War II on the gallows. The Nuremberg Code, requires:

free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit,…”


No one knows what these metallic structures are, or what they do. It might be high time to have Pfizer CEO Albert Bourlas waterboarded until he tells us.

Below: Screenshot of peer-reviewed study in International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research

image.png
“Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study,” International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (Direct to Study)

"For a biological science paper the study makes a fascinating and sometimes hair-raising read. The all-important abstract to the study begins:

“Systematic analyses of observable real-time injuries at the cellular level in recipients of the “safe and effective” COVID-19 injectables are published herein a peer-reviewed context for the first time.The global administration of these often-mandated products from late 2020 triggered a plethora of independent research studies of the modified RNA injectable gene therapies, most notably those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna. The contents of COVID-19 injectables were examined under a stereomicroscopeat up to 400X magnification. Carefully preserved specimens were cultured in a range of distinct mediato observe immediate and long-term cause-and-effect relationships between the injectables and living cells under carefully controlled conditions. From such research,reasonable inferences can be drawn about observed injuries worldwide that have occurred since the injectables were pressed upon billions of individuals.”


“In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous —on the order of 3~4 x106 per milliliter ofthe injectable—visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1to 100μm,or greater,of many different shapes. There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables,and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures. As time progressed during incubation,simple one-and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent,thin,flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains. Some of these seemed to appear and then disappear over time.Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.”

Passages include:

“When the new original vial of Pfizer concentrate was examined under the stereomicroscope, it showed only a few moving worm-like entities or a few small particles,but contrastingly when it was diluted in a1:6ratio (0.3ml:1.8 ml) with normal saline following the recommended practice for injection into a human recipient, the contents appeared to wake up,come to life and get activate, revealing a profusion of various shapes of rods, key-shaped structures, and other formations within a few minutes. These new entities did not resemble any known, natural, or identifiable organic entities(Figure 5b —new Pfizer).”


And:

“Progressive death to sperm cells occurred within a few hours after exposure, even in low concentrations, to the various injectables. This rapid destruction of sperm cells did not align with our initial expectations, but the process was consistent with reactions observed in the blood specimens where we also saw less rapid but also progressive damage.”


Below: example of unidentified metallic nano-structure found in COVID vaccines by authors.

image-2.png


As usual Dr. John Campbell does an admirable job of boiling the study down into layman’s terms.
Dr. John Campbell discussion of study (view at Rumble)



Official UK data has suggested that excess deaths around the world have been primarily among the vaccinated. And in May 2024, a world renown pathologist, Professor Dr. Arne Burkhardt MD, made a presentation at the European Parliament which estimated that in 77% of the autopsies he had performed at the request of families of persons who died unexpectedly after the vaccine, the vaccine “had an important effect on the death process.”

Excess Deaths in countries around the world have ranged from none to 38%. For 2021, the year of the vaccine roll-out and vaccine mandates, excess deaths in the US were 17.8%, and 9.8% in 2022.
In the US in the last quarter of 2021, excess deaths were up 40%, mostly among working age people.


Life insurance executive Scott Davison, CEO of insurance giant One America, said in January 2022:

“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic…So 40% is just unheard of.”


GLOBAL EXCESS DEATHS ALL-CAUSES 2020 – 2022. Source: “Excess mortality across countries in the Western World since the COVID-19 pandemic: ‘Our World in Data’ estimates of January 2020 to December 2022” (CLICK HERE FOR LARGER IMAGE)


COUNTRY202020212022
Albania
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Canada
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
Faeroe Islands
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Greenland
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Kosovo
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Moldova
Monaco
Montenegro
Netherlands
New Zealand
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
San Marino
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
UnitedKingdom
UnitedStates
26.7%
-2.1%
8.7%
15.7%
18.2%
14.3%
4.2%
9.6%
4.8%
13.2%
-1.4%
0.7%
-14.1%
0.8%
7.6%
2.6%
4.8%
-4.6%
7.7%
0.6%
4.2%
15.5%
34.5%
2.0%
18.6%
14.5%
2.7%
7.0%
14.5%
5.2%
8.4%
8.5%
-6.3%
28.2%
-0.4%
13.9%
8.4%
13.1%
32.2%
15.5%
8.6%
13.8%
16.6%
8.3%
11.7%
12.8%
15.3%
40.7%
2.5%
8.9%
2.9%
34.8%
38.5%
4.1%
22.7%
14.6%
23.0%
2.8%
18.2%
-1.2%
4.4%
5.3%
6.7%
14.2%
-5.1%
19.6%
1.3%
8.3%
10.5%
30.8%
23.8%
-0.1%
30.2%
-1.8%
6.5%
30.3%
22.4%
36.3%
9.7%
-1.5%
42.7%
3.3%
22.8%
9.9%
28.8%
19.2%
34.8%
36.9%
10.2%
6.4%
2.6%
5.0%
9.7%
17.8%
5.6%
12.8%
10.2%
6.6%
11.0%
11.4%
6.8%
12.6%
15.4%
4.4%
5.6%
10.6%
10.0%
13.4%
6.5%
9.5%
11.4%
-8.4%
5.1%
16.1%
9.4%
11.2%
-10.8%
8.7%
3.1%
17.9%
-4.4%
6.0%
7.3%
10.8%
7.6%
7.7%
6.4%
12.4%
12.0%
5.5%
8.4%
4.0%
-0.5%
10.3%
10.3%
4.6%
9.8%
5.5%
9.2%
7.6%
9.8%
Pathologist Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. (view at Rumble) (Presentation slides)


A lawsuit filed in June 2024 by the Attorney General of the State of Kansas, Chris Kobach, against Pfizer for, among other things, destroying clinical trials data, and falsely claiming that its COVID vaccine prevented transmission from person to person, has been joined by four other states, Utah, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.

In December of 2021 doctors and scientists, including a former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer, filed criminal complaint at the International Criminal Court in the Hague (ICC) which named Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla for Crimes Against Humanity."
 
This is not a reputable journal and is not accepted by scientists as a good source.

This study has never passed good peer review.

Fact CheckHealth Conspiracy Theory Fact Check

Read this article in:​

Read this article in: English

Fact Check: Do COVID-19 vaccines contain nanobots?​


Fact Checked ByDr Priyamvada

Published on:
August 29, 2024
Last updated on: September 3, 2024
Facebook
Twitter
Fact Check: Do COVID-19 vaccines contain nanobots?
Focus-on-COVID-19-vaccine-with-a-microscope-1068x601.jpg


Last Updated on September 3, 2024 by Dr Priyamvada

Quick Take

A post on X claims that COVID-19 vaccines contain nanobots and can cause turbo cancer or autoimmune diseases. Our fact check reveals it’s False.
false rating

The Claim

A viral post on X (formerly Twitter) claims that Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines contain “nanobots.” The post also alleges that it can cause “turbo cancer” and autoimmune diseases. It references a study by Dr Young Mi Lee and Dr Daniel Broudy from Okinawa Christian University. They supposedly discovered these components under 400X magnification, describing them as “animated worm-like” entities. The post further asserts that these nanobots are part of a larger conspiracy involving the “Internet of Bodies” and synthetic “Biohybrid Magnetic Robots.”

Fact Check

Do COVID-19 vaccines contain nanobots?


What did the study by Dr Young Mi Lee and Dr Daniel Broudy actually find?

The study by Dr Young Mi Lee and Dr Daniel Broudy, mentioned in the claim, has not been published in any reputable peer-reviewed journal. The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, where the claim appeared, is not recognised in the scientific community as a reliable source. No credible evidence supports their findings of “undisclosed additional engineered components” in vaccine vials. Additionally, the claim that they used 400X magnification to identify complex “nanobots” or structures is highly questionable. Because, this level of magnification is insufficient to detect the kind of detail necessary to make such claims.
The study suggests that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain self-assembling nanotechnology, but there are several significant limitations to consider. It was published in predatory journals like the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research and shared on ResearchGate, neither of which guarantees scientific authenticity. The study does not have rigorous peer review, uses insufficient methodologies, such as low magnification, has a small and non-representative sample size, and exhibits clear bias against vaccines. Therefore, its claims lack credible scientific support and should be viewed with significant scepticism.

 
This is not a reputable journal and is not accepted by scientists as a good source.

This study has never passed good peer review.

Fact CheckHealth Conspiracy Theory Fact Check

Read this article in:​

Read this article in: English

Fact Check: Do COVID-19 vaccines contain nanobots?​


Fact Checked ByDr Priyamvada

Published on:
August 29, 2024
Last updated on: September 3, 2024
Facebook
Twitter
Fact Check: Do COVID-19 vaccines contain nanobots?
Focus-on-COVID-19-vaccine-with-a-microscope-1068x601.jpg


Last Updated on September 3, 2024 by Dr Priyamvada

Quick Take

A post on X claims that COVID-19 vaccines contain nanobots and can cause turbo cancer or autoimmune diseases. Our fact check reveals it’s False.
false rating

The Claim

A viral post on X (formerly Twitter) claims that Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines contain “nanobots.” The post also alleges that it can cause “turbo cancer” and autoimmune diseases. It references a study by Dr Young Mi Lee and Dr Daniel Broudy from Okinawa Christian University. They supposedly discovered these components under 400X magnification, describing them as “animated worm-like” entities. The post further asserts that these nanobots are part of a larger conspiracy involving the “Internet of Bodies” and synthetic “Biohybrid Magnetic Robots.”

Fact Check

Do COVID-19 vaccines contain nanobots?


What did the study by Dr Young Mi Lee and Dr Daniel Broudy actually find?

The study by Dr Young Mi Lee and Dr Daniel Broudy, mentioned in the claim, has not been published in any reputable peer-reviewed journal. The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, where the claim appeared, is not recognised in the scientific community as a reliable source. No credible evidence supports their findings of “undisclosed additional engineered components” in vaccine vials. Additionally, the claim that they used 400X magnification to identify complex “nanobots” or structures is highly questionable. Because, this level of magnification is insufficient to detect the kind of detail necessary to make such claims.
The study suggests that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain self-assembling nanotechnology, but there are several significant limitations to consider. It was published in predatory journals like the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research and shared on ResearchGate, neither of which guarantees scientific authenticity. The study does not have rigorous peer review, uses insufficient methodologies, such as low magnification, has a small and non-representative sample size, and exhibits clear bias against vaccines. Therefore, its claims lack credible scientific support and should be viewed with significant scepticism.


You mean it isn’t accepted by Big Pharma which funds your beloved medical institutions which you are not allowed to question.
 
This is not a reputable journal and is not accepted by scientists as a good source.


1. You mean those "reputable" science journals like the Lancet, of which Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet said "much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue?" Mostly because of conflicts of interest with Big Pharma which advertises heavily in the medical science journals?

`Skeptical of medical science reports?

This science journal is more reputable than others because it doesn't take money from Big Pharma. If you want a short education on these conflicts of interest watch:

The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine, The corruption of Science by Big Pharma


2. Your debunk source, "The Healthy Indian Project" is funded by Youtube, which is famous for censoring any information which is critical of the COVID vaccines. So your source is garbage.

On August 2020, THIP Media received a grant funding of USD 31,800 from YouTube (via the Google News Initiative) through Fact Checking Development Fund.

No further debunk of your debunk is required. India is where they allowed Bill Gates to inject thousands of young girls from illiterate families with Gardasil, like human guinea pigs. Many died.

 
We tried to stop the antivaxxer lemmings from going over the cliff.

We failed.

It's to our credit that we tried and keep trying, given that we benefit from their deaths.
 
We tried to stop the antivaxxer lemmings from going over the cliff.

We failed.

It's to our credit that we tried and keep trying, given that we benefit from their deaths.

LOL it is you mud bloods who are dying. Imaging allowing yourself to be injected with a 6-months trial experimental junk shot, for a 99.8% recovery rate bug. Darwinism at its best! Can I have your apartment? I doubt you are solvent enough to own.



Screenshot 2024-09-01 11.09.51 PM.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top