PENNSYLVANIA Files In Support of Texas in SCOTUS

[Claudette]

At first glance I was unimpressed with the filings because they all came from states that Trump won....but THIS! This is something very different and very significant folks. Add that to the growing number of witnesses coming out of the woodwork now and you have a Real headache brewing for Roberts who you know is going to try like hell to sweep this under the carpet.

Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania

www.theepochtimes.com

Don't look for this headline in the MSM......you'll find it in an actual news paper.

JO

so the state that texas is suing is joining in the lawsuit to sue themselves???

Looks like it. At least those folks are honest. I'm sure the lefty loons on this board will find it funny. They should be sweating.

 

[candycorn]

At first glance I was unimpressed with the filings because they all came from states that Trump won....but THIS! This is something very different and very significant folks. Add that to the growing number of witnesses coming out of the woodwork now and you have a Real headache brewing for Roberts who you know is going to try like hell to sweep this under the carpet.

Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania

www.theepochtimes.com

Don't look for this headline in the MSM......you'll find it in an actual news paper.

JO

so the state that texas is suing is joining in the lawsuit to sue themselves???

Looks like it. At least those folks are honest. I'm sure the lefty loons on this board will find it funny. They should be sweating.

The House of Representatives in Pennsylvania is powerless to act on their own. Happy to burst your bubble.

 

[Claudette]

At first glance I was unimpressed with the filings because they all came from states that Trump won....but THIS! This is something very different and very significant folks. Add that to the growing number of witnesses coming out of the woodwork now and you have a Real headache brewing for Roberts who you know is going to try like hell to sweep this under the carpet.

Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania

www.theepochtimes.com

Don't look for this headline in the MSM......you'll find it in an actual news paper.

JO

so the state that texas is suing is joining in the lawsuit to sue themselves???

Looks like it. At least those folks are honest. I'm sure the lefty loons on this board will find it funny. They should be sweating.

The House of Representatives in Pennsylvania is powerless to act on their own. Happy to burst your bubble.

Tell that to the House. They sure did jump on the Texas band wagon.

Happy to burst your bubble.

 

[candycorn]

At first glance I was unimpressed with the filings because they all came from states that Trump won....but THIS! This is something very different and very significant folks. Add that to the growing number of witnesses coming out of the woodwork now and you have a Real headache brewing for Roberts who you know is going to try like hell to sweep this under the carpet.

Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania

www.theepochtimes.com

Don't look for this headline in the MSM......you'll find it in an actual news paper.

JO

so the state that texas is suing is joining in the lawsuit to sue themselves???

Looks like it. At least those folks are honest. I'm sure the lefty loons on this board will find it funny. They should be sweating.

The House of Representatives in Pennsylvania is powerless to act on their own. Happy to burst your bubble.

Tell that to the House. They sure did jump on the Texas band wagon.

Happy to burst your bubble.

And???

What are they going to do? Please display your political expertise and show us how their support does anything.

cue the crickets.

 

[The Original Tree]

If this fraud is not overturned, the states should leave The Union. They could declare themselves Independent Republics, and declare that all their tax dollars stay within their Independent Republics, then recall all their Senators and House Reps back to the states.

 

[colfax_m]

Tell that to the House. They sure did jump on the Texas band wagon.

If the Pennsylvania house had sued before the election claiming the changes were unconstitutional, they might have had a point.

Waiting until you lose an election to sue and eliminate the votes of people who did nothing wrong and operated under the rules of the day is wrong and should not be allowed in any country that values the democratic process.

 

[Claudette]

Tell that to the House. They sure did jump on the Texas band wagon.

If the Pennsylvania house had sued before the election claiming the changes were unconstitutional, they might have had a point.

Waiting until you lose an election to sue and eliminate the votes of people who did nothing wrong and operated under the rules of the day is wrong and should not be allowed in any country that values the democratic process.

They did sue and the 5th circuit court upheld the Governor.

 

[colfax_m]

They did sue and the 4th circuit court upheld the Governor.

Good point. Technically they sided with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

So if this is the same complaint, why would anyone expect a different outcome? You had a fair hearing and you lost.

 

[Claudette]

They did sue and the 4th circuit court upheld the Governor.

Good point. Technically they sided with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

So if this is the same complaint, why would anyone expect a different outcome? You had a fair hearing and you lost.

Not me. The Dems in the PA house who tried to stop the Governor. They lost.

 

[Decus]

So apparently some people believe that votes cast and counted in violation of or contrary to state and federal laws is Acceptable. I heard with my own ears people say we need to win by any means necessary. One illegally cast or counted vote is not an acceptable scenario. If the States in question didn't follow their own election laws ( not edicts, executive orders or consent decrees ) then votes cast in opposition to the law should be excluded........ which basically means all of them. If the Citizens of these States have an issue they should vote for Leaders that follow the laws.

OR...

Legal votes cast in a fully legal manner as outlined by local state laws are acceptable and those votes elected Biden to the presidency.

There is that you know...

Have you read the Election laws of all 4 States they are very specific, none of them allow for votes cast in opposition to the strict standards set by the legislatures. So read then rant you'll be more believable.

Just one example of a State violating its own constitution:

"Fourteen months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot with a signature that didn’t match the signature that they had on file, that would be discarded, if it was counted, that would be criminal fraud. Fourteen months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot beyond election day, it wouldn’t be counted, if it was, that would be fraud. If you sent in a ballot without a postal date stamped on it, it wouldn’t be counted, and if it was, that would be fraud. Or if you sent in a ballot where they couldn’t tell what the date was, if there was a smudge on the ink, it wouldn’t be counted, and if it was counted, that would be fraud," Levin said. "All of those ballots today count. They were all counted in Pennsylvania because of unconstitutional and illegal changes that were made by officials quote, unquote, 'officially,' by individuals in Pennsylvania."

Mark Levin Details How Democrats in Pennsylvania Changed the Rules on Election Fraud

townhall.com

.

 

[colfax_m]

Not me. The Dems in the PA house who tried to stop the Governor. They lost.

The Republican in the PA house tried to reverse the decision by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in federal court.

They lost. It’s important that they lost because they’re the only ones who can have any credible claim of standing and harm. Unlike Texas.

 

[Decus]

So apparently some people believe that votes cast and counted in violation of or contrary to state and federal laws is Acceptable. I heard with my own ears people say we need to win by any means necessary. One illegally cast or counted vote is not an acceptable scenario. If the States in question didn't follow their own election laws ( not edicts, executive orders or consent decrees ) then votes cast in opposition to the law should be excluded........ which basically means all of them. If the Citizens of these States have an issue they should vote for Leaders that follow the laws.

OR...

Legal votes cast in a fully legal manner as outlined by local state laws are acceptable and those votes elected Biden to the presidency.

There is that you know...

Have you read the Election laws of all 4 States they are very specific, none of them allow for votes cast in opposition to the strict standards set by the legislatures. So read then rant you'll be more believable.

Just one example of a State violating its own constitution:

"Fourteen months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot with a signature that didn’t match the signature that they had on file, that would be discarded, if it was counted, that would be criminal fraud. Fourteen months ago in the state of Pennsylvania, if you sent in a ballot beyond election day, it wouldn’t be counted, if it was, that would be fraud. If you sent in a ballot without a postal date stamped on it, it wouldn’t be counted, and if it was, that would be fraud. Or if you sent in a ballot where they couldn’t tell what the date was, if there was a smudge on the ink, it wouldn’t be counted, and if it was counted, that would be fraud," Levin said. "All of those ballots today count. They were all counted in Pennsylvania because of unconstitutional and illegal changes that were made by officials quote, unquote, 'officially,' by individuals in Pennsylvania."

Mark Levin Details How Democrats in Pennsylvania Changed the Rules on Election Fraud

townhall.com

.

What Pennsylvania should have done to make their voting changes constitutional according to their State constitution:

"Under the constitution of Pennsylvania, if there are to be any election law changes, you have to amend the constitution. Did they amend the constitution? No. What’s required to amend the constitution of Pennsylvania? It’s very complicated.

There needs to be a majority vote of both houses of the state legislature, not once, but twice. Then there needs to be a respite. Then there needs to be ads in at least two papers in every county in Pennsylvania, all 67 counties, then there needs to be a respite.

Then, finally, the citizenry of Pennsylvania get to vote on whether or not they want the amendment, it has to be on the ballot. Did that happen? No, it didn’t happen."

Levin: Why Pennsylvania Mail-in-Ballot Changes Are Unconstitutional

FNC host Mark Levin comments on voting fraud in the 2020 election: MARK LEVIN, FOX NEWS: Hello America I'm Mark Levin and this is Life Liberty and Levin and I'm glad you're with us. Fraud in an election. What is fraud? There's criminal fraud, there's civil fraud, what happens when a state...

www.realclearpolitics.com

Clearly fraud.

.

 

[colfax_m]

Just one example of a State violating its own constitution:

Shoulda brought this up before the election.

Challenging laws just because you think it’ll win you an election you just lost is not acceptable for obvious reasons.

 

[Dragonlady]

So apparently some people believe that votes cast and counted in violation of or contrary to state and federal laws is Acceptable. I heard with my own ears people say we need to win by any means necessary. One illegally cast or counted vote is not an acceptable scenario. If the States in question didn't follow their own election laws ( not edicts, executive orders or consent decrees ) then votes cast in opposition to the law should be excluded........ which basically means all of them. If the Citizens of these States have an issue they should vote for Leaders that follow the laws.

OR...

Legal votes cast in a fully legal manner as outlined by local state laws are acceptable and those votes elected Biden to the presidency.

There is that you know...

Have you read the Election laws of all 4 States they are very specific, none of them allow for votes cast in opposition to the strict standards set by the legislatures. So read then rant you'll be more believable.

That would be on you to prove that any particular vote is in violation of the standards set, how many of those votes there are and, most importantly, that said number is sufficient to overturn the results.

The unlawful change in standards is enough. Such unlawful changes taint every affected ballot. Fruit of the poison tree...

Look at you quoting Law and Order like a big boy. Except this isn't a criminal trial, and so your "fruit of the poison tree" line doesn't apply.

 

[L.K.Eder]

KAMALA STILL HAS NOT OFFICIALLY GIVEN UP HER SENATE SEAT....WHAT DOES SHE KNOW?

At first glance I was unimpressed with the filings because they all came from states that Trump won....but THIS! This is something very different and very significant folks. Add that to the growing number of witnesses coming out of the woodwork now and you have a Real headache brewing for Roberts who you know is going to try like hell to sweep this under the carpet.

Pennsylvania House Leaders File Brief to Support Texas in Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania

www.theepochtimes.com

Don't look for this headline in the MSM......you'll find it in an actual news paper.

BANG! This is the kind of language that Judges are likely to hear.... This will get a 5 to 4 in favor of I believe with the three progressives rubber stamping the Dems and Roberts ducking for cover behind PC cowardice.

Pennsylvania’s House speaker and majority leader on Thursday filed an amici curiae brief with the Supreme Court against the state of Pennsylvania and in favor of Texas’s lawsuit against the commonwealth and three other states.

A brief (pdf) filed by Pennsylvania House Speaker Bryan Cutler and Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff, both Republicans, requests that the Supreme Court “carefully consider the procedural issues and questions raised by the Plaintiff concerning the administration of the 2020 General Election in Pennsylvania.”

“The unimpeachability of our elections requires clear procedures of administration so that everyone gets a fair shake. Unfortunately, outside actors have so markedly twisted and gerrymandered the Commonwealth’s Election Code to the point that amici find it unrecognizable from the laws that they enacted,” they wrote, adding that the state of Texas “raised important questions about how this procedural malfeasance affected the 2020 General Election.”

In the lawsuit, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton alleged that Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin introduced changes to election laws, deeming them unconstitutional. The suit also contends that by doing so, those states treated voters unequally and created significant voting irregularities by rescinding certain ballot-integrity measures.

Filed on Monday night, the lawsuit is requesting the Supreme Court to declare the four states carried out their respective elections in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

“The states violated statutes enacted by their duly elected legislatures, thereby violating the Constitution. By ignoring both state and federal law, these states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections,” Paxton said in a statement announcing the legal petition.

Cutler and Benninghoff, in support of Paxton’s lawsuit, further stipulated that “under the pretextual guise of COVID-19, special interests began attempting to use Pennsylvania courts” to carry out “election procedures of their own choosing,” citing mail-in ballot extensions implemented by Kathy Boockvar, the Pennsylvania secretary of state.


JO

4 years ago mike pence had not given up his governor's seat. he didn't until January 9, 2017. what did he know?

 

[progressive hunter]

Tell that to the House. They sure did jump on the Texas band wagon.

If the Pennsylvania house had sued before the election claiming the changes were unconstitutional, they might have had a point.

Waiting until you lose an election to sue and eliminate the votes of people who did nothing wrong and operated under the rules of the day is wrong and should not be allowed in any country that values the democratic process.

so you agree its unconstitutional???

 

[colfax_m]

so you agree its unconstitutional???

I don’t have time for your trolling today.

 

[progressive hunter]

so you agree its unconstitutional???

I don’t have time for your trolling today.

so you do,,,
that means all those votes are unlawful and should be thrown out,,

glad you agree

 

[colfax_m]

so you agree its unconstitutional???

I don’t have time for your trolling today.

so you do,,,
that means all those votes are unlawful and should be thrown out,,

glad you agree

No. Go away.

 

[progressive hunter]

so you agree its unconstitutional???

I don’t have time for your trolling today.

so you do,,,
that means all those votes are unlawful and should be thrown out,,

glad you agree

No. Go away.

but you just said timing was the issue with the suit,, so that means you know it was unconstitutional and the votes were unlawful,,,

its OK I understand your reluctance to say it,,