Xchel
Active Member
She didn't cross a damned thing.
So how did she get to that sidewalk then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She didn't cross a damned thing.
When you are in a group protesting, that becomes an unruly mob of law breakers, you are going to have to make your own decision and protect yourself.
1. Get out of the situation or get caught up in the situation, and sometimes you pay the consequences.
What was the group protesting and why was it such a small amount of people?
They are against capitalism and wanted to shut down Wall St.
They are for redistribution of wealth.
So they want to bring down wealth, but at the same time they want wealth redistributed.
Then the question is - If there is no longer wealth, then were to you get the money for redistribution?
You've ignored the part where the marchers deliberately crossed police lines.
What I haven't ignored is the VICTIM'sactions.
She didn't cross a damned thing.
Basically what you're now supporting is the concept of COLLECTIVE GUILT.
STop squirming and distorting the facts to suit you purposes.
Yuu think its okay for cops to attack people whose politics you disapprove of.
The woman who was attacked was doing NOTHING to warrant the attack.
If you look at the people in this protest you'll see a bunch of naive youngsters that have been brainwashed by their far left college professors into believing that they can seize wealth from those that have it, distribute it to those who don't and that the previously wealthy will continue to work hard to make MORE money
If they left the sidewalk AT ANY POINT and we know they did...they broke the law..beyond that if anyone in the protest violated the sidewalk rule then the entire protest became illegal...why? Well they were required to have a permit...that is what was illegal and we know they HAD NO PERMIT
What a load of bullocks.
You are seriously defending this pig of a cop? He attacked a women without provocation.
Shame on you.
Not defending the cop one way or another except to say that those protests became VIOLENT and saying that the protest was not protected under the constitution, 1 because there was no permit for where they were located at, because they already had been designated a different area to protest...2 because screaming offenses at the cops is considered disorderly conduct, you shout obsenities you aren't protected from being sprayed in the face with pepper spray. and 3 when they were told to disperse that is exactly what they should have done.
If you look at the people in this protest you'll see a bunch of naive youngsters that have been brainwashed by their far left college professors into believing that they can seize wealth from those that have it, distribute it to those who don't and that the previously wealthy will continue to work hard to make MORE money
'Scuse me, Jack, but this is Wall Street we're talking about. They don't make doodly-squat. They play financial shell games and legal con games. They accumulate money, but they don't make it. It's all paper-shuffling and transfer of wealth from suckers to hucksters, net gain zero.
Odds are every one of those protesters has made more real wealth (much of it purloined by the company they worked for) than all of Wall Street put together; the only way that might not be true is if one or another of the protesters has literally never held even a part-time job in his or her life. And even then, while he or she will not have made more real wealth than all of Wall Street, it ain't less, either.
What they need to do is another Kent State. That would put an end to it immediately. How many of the people who work on Wall Street would just like to pick up a barrel stave, crow bar or baseball bat and just wade in as a "counter-protester". They should be encouraged to do so.
What they need to do is another Kent State. That would put an end to it immediately. How many of the people who work on Wall Street would just like to pick up a barrel stave, crow bar or baseball bat and just wade in as a "counter-protester". They should be encouraged to do so.
First of all I don't think you understand the necessity of the stock market and what it's function is. Without Wall Street corporations wouldn't have capital to invest and grow.
As for the protesters? After looking at these people on video clip after video clip I'd be willing to wager a nice sum of money that most of them are not working at a normal job making wealth of any kind. They are part of a new "growth industry" here in America...the professional activist.
pepper spray in the face is not considered police brutality it is making a disorderly citizen behave themselves...actually he was justified...they went there with the intention of civil disobedience and they got the results of that. Since you don't condone violence against police, do you realize that at least one of those protesters was arrested and charged with assaulting a police officer?
First of all I don't think you understand the necessity of the stock market and what it's function is. Without Wall Street corporations wouldn't have capital to invest and grow.
An exaggeration, but I grant the function of one tiny segment of Wall Street. However, over the past thirty years it has run out of control until most of what it does is exactly what I described: a shell game designed to part suckers from their money. The stock exchange is only a tiny fraction of what Wall Street does today.
As for the protesters? After looking at these people on video clip after video clip I'd be willing to wager a nice sum of money that most of them are not working at a normal job making wealth of any kind. They are part of a new "growth industry" here in America...the professional activist.
You're mistaken, but you can be forgiven for not understanding this, since most of its development has been invisible to anyone who doesn't frequent left-wing blog sites or discussion forums. What I'm seeing is the eruption into the analog world of something that's been building on the Internet and social media for years. These are mostly young people, and the number of people who are participating off the streets vastly dwarfs the number who are on the streets at any one time. But the movement has matured to the point that we are now seeing this sort of thing. We will see more of it. This is only the beginning.
And On Line Trading doesn't contribute to volatility?
Intense, I was in the line of fire of both water cannons here in Honduras, rocks and pepper spray...unintentionally mind you..we were marching in support of the removal of Mel Zelaya and counter protesters came in with rocks and moltov cocktails...the military got involved as well as the police to stop them and the marchers that were being peaceful accidently got hit with the stuff when they went after counter protesters...so yeah I know what it feels like..it is still used for an out of control person and is legal.
And On Line Trading doesn't contribute to volatility?
Indeed it does. All I was really conceding is that buried somewhere under all the financial chicanery there's a core to the stock exchange that does serve a useful purpose.