Perfect call followed by aid block.

[iamwhatiseem]

 

[theHawk]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.

Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?

What a pity you can't prove claimed corruption.

His son worked for Burisma, when he had no experience in the energy sector. It looks like a Quid pro quo and thus can be investigated. Maybe it’s not. Maybe he is really smart and speaks Ukrainian as well. What’s the harm in looking? We don’t need proof, just an accusation. See Kavanaugh and of course Russia collusion hoax.

 

[toobfreak]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

In a normal world, can you imagine if they were giving aid to some little country and Obama said HOLD ON! Something funny going on here! And rather than look at it, they impeached him?! And for being a "threat to national security?"

I mean, if Ukraine were hit by an asteroid tomorrow, would our "national security" change?

And if we were so concerned over Russia:

1. Why did Obama pull the eastern missile defense shield that had been stopping Russia?
2. Why did Obama give the Russians uranium?
3. Why did Obama laugh when Romney told him Russia was our main geopolitical concern?
4. Why did Obama mock Trump as ludicrous when he suggested our elections were vulnerable?
   
5. And why did Obama promise to be even more flexible with Russia after getting reelected? Flexible in what?

Has anyone ever bothered to ask? If Trump told an enemy he would be more flexible, they would literally stop the presses and all of Washington finding out declaring Trump a likely Russian agent!

The left know these facts, hey just refuse to acknowledge them.

These are the same people that said nothing about the Hussein telling a Russian diplomat that he would be more “flexible” for Putin after his re-election. How was that not a Quid Pro Quo?

Their panic in the streets was strangely missing. And for a furtive microphone slip said in secret, not an open statement said in public aboveboard with 20 people listening in.

 

[theHawk]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.

Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?

What a pity you can't prove claimed corruption.

By the way, how’s that Mueller avatar working out for ya?

 

[toobfreak]

Soros ordered his Legions of Mindless Zombies to throw themselves in front of the incoming investigations into money laundering, human trafficking at the border and voter fraud

Not sure why Soros is always mentioned by the far right as some evil ogre trying to take over the world. This doesn't surprise me though since a huge number of republicans think that trump did no wrong by bribing the president of the Ukraine. Back to Soros. Here's what I get from one link below
George Soros is a favorite target of the right — here's how that happened

So Lessee, Jason, your reasoning goes like this:

Put someone right in the middle of Ukraine and all kinds of anti-American global affairs where we run into his influence at our every turn, then when someone points that out, rather than investigate it, dismiss it as a frivolous excuse by the Right?
​

That is kinda like having Hillary involved in everything from destruction of government records and evidence, to quid pro quo with foreign nations, failure to protect American citizens, gun running, theft, perjury and cover-up, and compromising the national security, then when anyone brings her up, dismisses it saying they must simply have "Hillary on the brain?"

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Why do trumps mates on here want to talk about anything other than what he did. There is a timeline, and events to back up the accusations. All they offer in return is a feast of conspiracy theories which they use to try and deflect from his guilt.

 

[Care4all]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

That is simply a lie.

Congressionally passed military aid CAN NOT BE HELD BACK by a president, unless he notifies congress and congress approves the delay.

Trump broke the law, and his oath to faithfully execute the law.

He should not have signed the aid Bill, vetoed it.... That was his option and legal move.

 

[toobfreak]

Why do trumps mates on here want to talk about anything other than what he did. There is a timeline, and events to back up the accusations. All they offer in return is a feast of conspiracy theories which they use to try and deflect from his guilt.

Tell us Tommy Tidwater, why is anything that clears Trump considered by you fake news, yet any conspiracy theory you put forth as fact? The only thing Trump "did" was make a common phone call, what is in question is the Democrat's professed INTERPRETATION of the MOTIVES behind the circumstances! Why do you confuse accusations with guilt, yet like so many other disingenuous tards on here, not ever see a shred of guilt by any democrats even when undeniable?

LET'S FACE IT: the democrats have spent a fortune lining up legal experts for years trying to manufacture any case against Trump they could, and THIS WAS THE BEST THEY HAD! Two things:

1. Asked a country about something done there that by EVERY MEASURE, smacks of suspicion and corruption by a guy now trying to be our president!
2. Exercising a president's normal legal rights.

The Democrats have rolled a bomb down a dark alley, only problem this time is that the person at the other end was themselves reflecting in the mirror.

 

[Faun]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.

Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?

What a pity you can't prove claimed corruption.

His son worked for Burisma, when he had no experience in the energy sector. It looks like a Quid pro quo and thus can be investigated. Maybe it’s not. Maybe he is really smart and speaks Ukrainian as well. What’s the harm in looking? We don’t need proof, just an accusation. See Kavanaugh and of course Russia collusion hoax.

So what if his son worked at Burisma?

 

[Faun]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.

Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?

What a pity you can't prove claimed corruption.

By the way, how’s that Mueller avatar working out for ya?

Worked out fine, Mueller did an exemplary job of getting to the truth.

 

[theHawk]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.

Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?

What a pity you can't prove claimed corruption.

By the way, how’s that Mueller avatar working out for ya?

Worked out fine, Mueller did an exemplary job of getting to the truth.

Yea, the truth that there was zero evidence of any “collusion” with Russia.

He just exposed himself as the tired, incompetent, loser that he always has been. He is best known for wrongly accusing people of treasonous crimes. See his anthrax case as well as the Russia hoax.

It fits you, keep it.

 

[Faun]

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.

Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?

What a pity you can't prove claimed corruption.

By the way, how’s that Mueller avatar working out for ya?

Worked out fine, Mueller did an exemplary job of getting to the truth.

Yea, the truth that there was zero evidence of any “collusion” with Russia.

He just exposed himself as the tired, incompetent, loser that he always has been. He is best known for wrongly accusing people of treasonous crimes. See his anthrax case as well as the Russia hoax.

It fits you, keep it.

Are you saying he didn't get to the truth?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

Prove it was re-election vs for what happened in 2016. I have Told you 100x you have to prove intent and how do you prove intent here? How did Trump know what the investigation would find? How did he know that Biden would even be the nominee? How did he know if the investigation may actually exonerate Biden and make him stronger? This was about 2016.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.

Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?

What a pity you can't prove claimed corruption.

By the way, how’s that Mueller avatar working out for ya?

Worked out fine, Mueller did an exemplary job of getting to the truth.

Yea, the truth that there was zero evidence of any “collusion” with Russia.

He just exposed himself as the tired, incompetent, loser that he always has been. He is best known for wrongly accusing people of treasonous crimes. See his anthrax case as well as the Russia hoax.

It fits you, keep it.

Are you saying he didn't get to the truth?

He did not say that. Can you not read?

 

[Faun]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

Prove it was re-election vs for what happened in 2016. I have Told you 100x you have to prove intent and how do you prove intent here? How did Trump know what the investigation would find? How did he know that Biden would even be the nominee? How did he know if the investigation may actually exonerate Biden and make him stronger? This was about 2016.

The only two things he asked for were regarding his election. There's nothing else it could be for.

 

[Faun]

What a pity you can't prove claimed corruption.

By the way, how’s that Mueller avatar working out for ya?

Worked out fine, Mueller did an exemplary job of getting to the truth.

Yea, the truth that there was zero evidence of any “collusion” with Russia.

He just exposed himself as the tired, incompetent, loser that he always has been. He is best known for wrongly accusing people of treasonous crimes. See his anthrax case as well as the Russia hoax.

It fits you, keep it.

Are you saying he didn't get to the truth?

He did not say that. Can you not read?

I asked if Mueller got to the truth. I responded to his response based on my question.

 

[theHawk]

By the way, how’s that Mueller avatar working out for ya?

Worked out fine, Mueller did an exemplary job of getting to the truth.

Yea, the truth that there was zero evidence of any “collusion” with Russia.

He just exposed himself as the tired, incompetent, loser that he always has been. He is best known for wrongly accusing people of treasonous crimes. See his anthrax case as well as the Russia hoax.

It fits you, keep it.

Are you saying he didn't get to the truth?

He did not say that. Can you not read?

I asked if Mueller got to the truth. I responded to his response based on my question.

Can you not read?

I said he did get to the truth, that there was no “collusion” and no crimes committed by the President.

 

[Faun]

Worked out fine, Mueller did an exemplary job of getting to the truth.

Yea, the truth that there was zero evidence of any “collusion” with Russia.

He just exposed himself as the tired, incompetent, loser that he always has been. He is best known for wrongly accusing people of treasonous crimes. See his anthrax case as well as the Russia hoax.

It fits you, keep it.

Are you saying he didn't get to the truth?

He did not say that. Can you not read?

I asked if Mueller got to the truth. I responded to his response based on my question.

Can you not read?

I said he did get to the truth, that there was no “collusion” and no crimes committed by the President.

Great, glad to see you agree he did an exemplary job getting to the truth. So who knows what beef you have with my avatar?

 

[Yarddog]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

There is no proof he did anything for his own re-election campaign, only all this supposition that he did. Democrats were lined up to impeach Trump before the phone call was ever made, so of course they were looking for anything to be outraged about. Anything they could use to continue their previous impeachment attempt.

 

[Faun]

The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.

Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.

There is no proof he did anything for his own re-election campaign, only all this supposition that he did. Democrats were lined up to impeach Trump before the phone call was ever made, so of course they were looking for anything to be outraged about. Anything they could use to continue their previous impeachment attempt.

Nonsense. He sought to have a political rival publicly investigated. The only benefit to that was to his own campaign. It certainly was of no benefit to Ukraine which means it was also no benefit to the U.S..