Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Link? He mentioned 2016 several times. Trump doesn’t even know who he is going up against yet. Think, Fawn, even though Biden has a slight lead now once either Sanders or Warren drop the Leftist vote will consolidate and they will overtake Biden. This was about 2016. But maybe you are right. How do you prove it?The only two things he asked for were regarding his election. There's nothing else it could be for.Prove it was re-election vs for what happened in 2016. I have Told you 100x you have to prove intent and how do you prove intent here? How did Trump know what the investigation would find? How did he know that Biden would even be the nominee? How did he know if the investigation may actually exonerate Biden and make him stronger? This was about 2016.Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.
Truth that there was no proof of conspiracy or collusion? Who knows but when he appeared in person he looked and sounded like a senile old man. Optics are important. He lost a lot of credibility.I asked if Mueller got to the truth. I responded to his response based on my question.He did not say that. Can you not read?Are you saying he didn't get to the truth?Worked out fine, Mueller did an exemplary job of getting to the truth.By the way, how’s that Mueller avatar working out for ya?
Yea, the truth that there was zero evidence of any “collusion” with Russia.
He just exposed himself as the tired, incompetent, loser that he always has been. He is best known for wrongly accusing people of treasonous crimes. See his anthrax case as well as the Russia hoax.
It fits you, keep it.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdfLink? He mentioned 2016 several times. Trump doesn’t even know who he is going up against yet. Think, Fawn, even though Biden has a slight lead now once either Sanders or Warren drop the Leftist vote will consolidate and they will overtake Biden. This was about 2016. But maybe you are right. How do you prove it?The only two things he asked for were regarding his election. There's nothing else it could be for.Prove it was re-election vs for what happened in 2016. I have Told you 100x you have to prove intent and how do you prove intent here? How did Trump know what the investigation would find? How did he know that Biden would even be the nominee? How did he know if the investigation may actually exonerate Biden and make him stronger? This was about 2016.Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.
He was the VP and he blames him and Obama for spying on him in 2015/16.https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdfLink? He mentioned 2016 several times. Trump doesn’t even know who he is going up against yet. Think, Fawn, even though Biden has a slight lead now once either Sanders or Warren drop the Leftist vote will consolidate and they will overtake Biden. This was about 2016. But maybe you are right. How do you prove it?The only two things he asked for were regarding his election. There's nothing else it could be for.Prove it was re-election vs for what happened in 2016. I have Told you 100x you have to prove intent and how do you prove intent here? How did Trump know what the investigation would find? How did he know that Biden would even be the nominee? How did he know if the investigation may actually exonerate Biden and make him stronger? This was about 2016.Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.
Biden wasn't running for president in 2016.
WTF? Quote Impeached Trump saying Biden spied on him...He was the VP and he blames him and Obama for spying on him in 2015/16.https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdfLink? He mentioned 2016 several times. Trump doesn’t even know who he is going up against yet. Think, Fawn, even though Biden has a slight lead now once either Sanders or Warren drop the Leftist vote will consolidate and they will overtake Biden. This was about 2016. But maybe you are right. How do you prove it?The only two things he asked for were regarding his election. There's nothing else it could be for.Prove it was re-election vs for what happened in 2016. I have Told you 100x you have to prove intent and how do you prove intent here? How did Trump know what the investigation would find? How did he know that Biden would even be the nominee? How did he know if the investigation may actually exonerate Biden and make him stronger? This was about 2016.Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.
Biden wasn't running for president in 2016.
In the phone call, Mr Trump asked the Ukrainian leader to investigate his political rival, Democrat Joe Biden.
WRONG, Jackass. Really helps to get your facts straight or at least learn to lie a lot better. Trump asked about certain activities of Joe Biden because they appeared CRIMINAL in nature, more corruption involving a country already steeped in corruption, and certainly not anything you'd want in a president without knowing about first, except Joe isn't exactly a political rival, he may never even be the actual candidate nominated to run against him. Biden is just one of about THIRTY people who are contending for that position.
BTW Bonebrain, if a politician can't investigate someone for corruption just because they are a "political rival," that makes half the people involved in Trump's impeachment, many of which are running to replace him, all GUILTY.
If that is the case why didn't he ask the DOJ to investigate it.
That's a good question. Has anyone bothered to ask? Could it be because Trump has caught the DOJ conspiring against him a dozen different ways already and has no confidence in them? I mean,
Where is Pete Strokok?
Where is Lisa Page?
Where is that IG report?
Why was the investigation into Hillary dropped, the evidence destroyed and then swept under the rug?
And if investigating a political rival is so bad, why was no one ever concerned for the investigation and interfering into Trump by Obama while still in office?
Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.
Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.
Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?
Of course you have. You always do. Interesting that the articles of impeachment say absolutely nothing about Trump withholding aid from Ukraine.Have I missed anything ?
Stupid syntax. Stupid claim. Stupid poster. Three in a row...You win, dumbass.It's been established that Biden had NO corruption.
Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.
Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.
Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?
It's been established that Biden had NO corruption.
Oh dear.Of course you have. You always do. Interesting that the articles of impeachment say absolutely nothing about Trump withholding aid from Ukraine.Have I missed anything ?
Have you ever wondered why? Of course you haven't. Because you are too fucking stupid.
Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.
Exposing Biden’s corruption is a benefit to the nation.
Are we supposed to let Dem’s corruption go unnoticed? Is a Democrat immune from just an investigation so long as they are running for President?
It's been established that Biden had NO corruption.
Thanks for the laugh
That is simply a lie.The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.
Congressionally passed military aid CAN NOT BE HELD BACK by a president, unless he notifies congress and congress approves the delay.
Trump broke the law, and his oath to faithfully execute the law.
He should not have signed the aid Bill, vetoed it.... That was his option and legal move.
Nonsense. He sought to have a political rival publicly investigated. The only benefit to that was to his own campaign. It certainly was of no benefit to Ukraine which means it was also no benefit to the U.S..Of course he can. But if he does so for the benefit of his own re-election campaign, he's gonna get impeached for abuse of power. Just like Impeached Trump did.The President controls foreign policy. He can withhold aid if a foreign leader sneezes if he wants. And there isn’t a damned thing you can do to change that fact.
There is no proof he did anything for his own re-election campaign, only all this supposition that he did. Democrats were lined up to impeach Trump before the phone call was ever made, so of course they were looking for anything to be outraged about. Anything they could use to continue their previous impeachment attempt.
Yeah. You have to wonder how the democrats running this politicized circus missed out on the chance to nail Trump with this "bombshell" charge that you and the BBC found out about.Oh dear.
Mate, you take my breath away you are so fucking stupid.Yeah. You have to wonder how the democrats running this politicized circus missed out on the chance to nail Trump with this "bombshell" charge that you and the BBC found out about.Oh dear.
What a special man you must be.
Ooooh...so much anger. So much stupidity. Is this how you treat your sheep clients?Mate, you take my breath away you are so fucking stupid.
Here is a short lesson.
Withholding aid is not an offence in itself. However it is when you link it to your own personal and private agenda.
So
Hey Ukraine, you are corrupt so you cant have the money is probably ok.
But
Hey Ukraine, you wont help me get re-elected so you cant have the money is not ok.
Its not complicated you docile fucker.
"Did he also mention to me in passing the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question about that. But that’s it. And that’s why we held up the money." ~ Mick MulvaneyOoooh...so much anger. So much stupidity. Is this how you treat your sheep clients?Mate, you take my breath away you are so fucking stupid.
Here is a short lesson.
Withholding aid is not an offence in itself. However it is when you link it to your own personal and private agenda.
So
Hey Ukraine, you are corrupt so you cant have the money is probably ok.
But
Hey Ukraine, you wont help me get re-elected so you cant have the money is not ok.
Its not complicated you docile fucker.
Speaking of being "fucking stupid" you still need to establish the fact that Donald Trump was indeed withholding aid to Ukraine until Zelinsky helped him out establishing Joe Biden's corruption.
You just seem to accept as fact such a thing ever happened despite the fact no one can establish this arrangement. Nice job, fat ass.
Trump says he wasn't demanding help from Zelinsky. Zelinsky says he wasn't pressured.
No one can find a smoking gun that establishes a quid pro quo between Zelinsky's help and the aid that Ukraine indeed did receive.
And of course the impeachment management team for the democrats are not making this dead end road a path to impeachment either. If they aren't bothering why are fat nosy Brits like you insisting you have the answers to it all?
You are one stupid thick headed fucker, aren't you?
He is not impeached until the articles go to the Senate.WTF? Quote Impeached Trump saying Biden spied on him...He was the VP and he blames him and Obama for spying on him in 2015/16.https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdfLink? He mentioned 2016 several times. Trump doesn’t even know who he is going up against yet. Think, Fawn, even though Biden has a slight lead now once either Sanders or Warren drop the Leftist vote will consolidate and they will overtake Biden. This was about 2016. But maybe you are right. How do you prove it?The only two things he asked for were regarding his election. There's nothing else it could be for.Prove it was re-election vs for what happened in 2016. I have Told you 100x you have to prove intent and how do you prove intent here? How did Trump know what the investigation would find? How did he know that Biden would even be the nominee? How did he know if the investigation may actually exonerate Biden and make him stronger? This was about 2016.
Biden wasn't running for president in 2016.
