Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Government intervention into childrens homes has been positive
Definition Time
"positive" = there was a "positive" flow of taxpayer money into the pockets of leftists who steal
you seem to be saying that only leftists care to see that all children are cared for.
Before our government turned as progressive as it did a century ago, people were not keeling over in the streets. They had family, community, the church. With runaway taxation and the "war on poverty," the plight of the poor has not got any better. It's worse, in fact, or have you not seen pictures of San Francisco and Honolulu?Soup kitchens, shelters, famine and disaster relief, and all the rest. No government, no corporation, no other organization at all has been as charitable as Christianity has.You obviously aren't aware of Christian hospitals, inner city gospel missions, the Salvation Army. Catholic Charities, overseas missions, etc.Oh, bullcorn. Jesus was a conservative Christian. He never referred anyone to a government program, but always to God.
Basically you are arguing we should freely give to the poor. Even with government programs the poor often times are not taken care of. When exactly do you suppose we will step up and do what the Bible instructs us to do?
Many do really great things. I never said otherwise. Despite that, are the needs of the poor being met? How much bigger of a hole would they be in if the above was all that was available?
If government would just leave charities alone, maybe things would be better.
you seem to be saying that only leftists care to see that all children are cared for.
No, I'm saying that Leftists always will be in favor of MORE GOVERNMENT because that is how leftists STEAL their money.
If there wasn't any spending, there would be nothing for leftists to steal. "Caring for kids" is a great banner from which to enable leftists like yourself to loot the US taxpayer. As for government caring for kids, geeez.... Government is filled with HOMOS, and HOMOS don't "care" for kids, they FUCK THEM....
Before our government turned as progressive as it did a century ago, people were not keeling over in the streets. They had family, community, the church. With runaway taxation and the "war on poverty," the plight of the poor has not got any better. It's worse, in fact, or have you not seen pictures of San Francisco and Honolulu?Soup kitchens, shelters, famine and disaster relief, and all the rest. No government, no corporation, no other organization at all has been as charitable as Christianity has.You obviously aren't aware of Christian hospitals, inner city gospel missions, the Salvation Army. Catholic Charities, overseas missions, etc.Basically you are arguing we should freely give to the poor. Even with government programs the poor often times are not taken care of. When exactly do you suppose we will step up and do what the Bible instructs us to do?
Many do really great things. I never said otherwise. Despite that, are the needs of the poor being met? How much bigger of a hole would they be in if the above was all that was available?
Yes people were. Women without husbands had to turn to prostitution in many cases. The life was very hard and short for these women. We had homes for children that were little more than places for widespread abuse of these children.
I do not think you know our history very well.
you seem to be saying that only leftists care to see that all children are cared for.
No, I'm saying that Leftists always will be in favor of MORE GOVERNMENT because that is how leftists STEAL their money.
If there wasn't any spending, there would be nothing for leftists to steal. "Caring for kids" is a great banner from which to enable leftists like yourself to loot the US taxpayer. As for government caring for kids, geeez.... Government is filled with HOMOS, and HOMOS don't "care" for kids, they FUCK THEM....
Before our government turned as progressive as it did a century ago, people were not keeling over in the streets. They had family, community, the church. With runaway taxation and the "war on poverty," the plight of the poor has not got any better. It's worse, in fact, or have you not seen pictures of San Francisco and Honolulu?Soup kitchens, shelters, famine and disaster relief, and all the rest. No government, no corporation, no other organization at all has been as charitable as Christianity has.You obviously aren't aware of Christian hospitals, inner city gospel missions, the Salvation Army. Catholic Charities, overseas missions, etc.
Many do really great things. I never said otherwise. Despite that, are the needs of the poor being met? How much bigger of a hole would they be in if the above was all that was available?
Yes people were. Women without husbands had to turn to prostitution in many cases. The life was very hard and short for these women. We had homes for children that were little more than places for widespread abuse of these children.
I do not think you know our history very well.
Thank you for your mention of women. I don't wish to denigrate anything that men did to unite their families and keep their families and communities alive. It is just that the hard work that women have always done has always been so ignored. History unspoken. I am talking about women of all colors, ethnicities, faiths, who have been maids, waitresses, cleaners, crop pickers, and so much else, many working overtime, to furnish a home for their children and put food on the table, but no one gives them any praise. When a boyfriend runs out on a pregnant woman, a husband runs out. Who's left to do the work?
You're still not paying attention.Before our government turned as progressive as it did a century ago, people were not keeling over in the streets. They had family, community, the church. With runaway taxation and the "war on poverty," the plight of the poor has not got any better. It's worse, in fact, or have you not seen pictures of San Francisco and Honolulu?Soup kitchens, shelters, famine and disaster relief, and all the rest. No government, no corporation, no other organization at all has been as charitable as Christianity has.You obviously aren't aware of Christian hospitals, inner city gospel missions, the Salvation Army. Catholic Charities, overseas missions, etc.Basically you are arguing we should freely give to the poor. Even with government programs the poor often times are not taken care of. When exactly do you suppose we will step up and do what the Bible instructs us to do?
Many do really great things. I never said otherwise. Despite that, are the needs of the poor being met? How much bigger of a hole would they be in if the above was all that was available?
If government would just leave charities alone, maybe things would be better.
The government got involved precisely BECAUSE people were "keeling over in the streets". Poverty was at 40% in the nation at the time of the Great Depression. When millions lost their jobs, the soup kitchens and Christian charities were totally overwhelmed, and donations dried up in the Depression. All of the church hospitals put end to end won't meet the medical needs of all of the people.
You're still not paying attention.Before our government turned as progressive as it did a century ago, people were not keeling over in the streets. They had family, community, the church. With runaway taxation and the "war on poverty," the plight of the poor has not got any better. It's worse, in fact, or have you not seen pictures of San Francisco and Honolulu?Soup kitchens, shelters, famine and disaster relief, and all the rest. No government, no corporation, no other organization at all has been as charitable as Christianity has.You obviously aren't aware of Christian hospitals, inner city gospel missions, the Salvation Army. Catholic Charities, overseas missions, etc.
Many do really great things. I never said otherwise. Despite that, are the needs of the poor being met? How much bigger of a hole would they be in if the above was all that was available?
If government would just leave charities alone, maybe things would be better.
The government got involved precisely BECAUSE people were "keeling over in the streets". Poverty was at 40% in the nation at the time of the Great Depression. When millions lost their jobs, the soup kitchens and Christian charities were totally overwhelmed, and donations dried up in the Depression. All of the church hospitals put end to end won't meet the medical needs of all of the people.
For decades now, GOVERNMENT has not fixed homelessness and the other social ills that you left-wingers insist on believing taxation will fix.
It ain't working. Can you not put two and two together? It ain't working. The only difference in the end, then, is that you left-wingers take money from people while right-wingers ask for money.
For decades now, GOVERNMENT has not fixed homelessness
Have you ever called the police about this stealing? Maybe they can help you with your other issues.you seem to be saying that only leftists care to see that all children are cared for.
No, I'm saying that Leftists always will be in favor of MORE GOVERNMENT because that is how leftists STEAL their money.
If there wasn't any spending, there would be nothing for leftists to steal. "Caring for kids" is a great banner from which to enable leftists like yourself to loot the US taxpayer. As for government caring for kids, geeez.... Government is filled with HOMOS, and HOMOS don't "care" for kids, they FUCK THEM....
If the unbelievers would support the Church like they're supposed to, there wouldn't be a need for government charity.Before our government turned as progressive as it did a century ago, people were not keeling over in the streets. They had family, community, the church. With runaway taxation and the "war on poverty," the plight of the poor has not got any better. It's worse, in fact, or have you not seen pictures of San Francisco and Honolulu?Soup kitchens, shelters, famine and disaster relief, and all the rest. No government, no corporation, no other organization at all has been as charitable as Christianity has.You obviously aren't aware of Christian hospitals, inner city gospel missions, the Salvation Army. Catholic Charities, overseas missions, etc.Basically you are arguing we should freely give to the poor. Even with government programs the poor often times are not taken care of. When exactly do you suppose we will step up and do what the Bible instructs us to do?
Many do really great things. I never said otherwise. Despite that, are the needs of the poor being met? How much bigger of a hole would they be in if the above was all that was available?
If government would just leave charities alone, maybe things would be better.
The government got involved precisely BECAUSE people were "keeling over in the streets". Poverty was at 40% in the nation at the time of the Great Depression. When millions lost their jobs, the soup kitchens and Christian charities were totally overwhelmed, and donations dried up in the Depression. All of the church hospitals put end to end won't meet the medical needs of all of the people.
Before our government turned as progressive as it did a century ago, people were not keeling over in the streets. They had family, community, the church. With runaway taxation and the "war on poverty," the plight of the poor has not got any better. It's worse, in fact, or have you not seen pictures of San Francisco and Honolulu?Soup kitchens, shelters, famine and disaster relief, and all the rest. No government, no corporation, no other organization at all has been as charitable as Christianity has.
Many do really great things. I never said otherwise. Despite that, are the needs of the poor being met? How much bigger of a hole would they be in if the above was all that was available?
Yes people were. Women without husbands had to turn to prostitution in many cases. The life was very hard and short for these women. We had homes for children that were little more than places for widespread abuse of these children.
I do not think you know our history very well.
Thank you for your mention of women. I don't wish to denigrate anything that men did to unite their families and keep their families and communities alive. It is just that the hard work that women have always done has always been so ignored. History unspoken. I am talking about women of all colors, ethnicities, faiths, who have been maids, waitresses, cleaners, crop pickers, and so much else, many working overtime, to furnish a home for their children and put food on the table, but no one gives them any praise. When a boyfriend runs out on a pregnant woman, a husband runs out. Who's left to do the work?
I tend to like women and you'll rarely find me talking negative about them as a whole. I was talking to a lawyer friend who was researching his family history. He was telling me about a grandfather in the early mid 19th century. He had 7000 acres along the current Virginia/West Virginia border.
When he died he left a very detailed will. Right down to a wash pan. Every single thing was left to the sons and the daughters got nothing.
This is our countries history that many clamor for today. No thanks..
Government handling kids is just a license for left wing homos to sexually abuse those kids....
Pay attention, Class, if you can. FEMA is not a charity. And anecdotes do not disprove generalities.Oh, I see. You're the world's charity case.When my parents` home took on 8 ft. of water from hurricane Ivan in 2004 the Salvation Army helped us with food and cleaning supplies during the emergency and the St. Vincent Depaul came through with a check for $150. FEMA wrote a check for $13,000 to help rebuild and replace things that were destroyed. $13,000 is a bit more than $150 and cleaning supplies. You think?Soup kitchens, shelters, famine and disaster relief, and all the rest. No government, no corporation, no other organization at all has been as charitable as Christianity has.You obviously aren't aware of Christian hospitals, inner city gospel missions, the Salvation Army. Catholic Charities, overseas missions, etc.
As someone who also experience the total loss of my home and everything in it, to a tornado, I find your comments beyond deplorable, but not unexpected. When I experienced this loss, family, friends, relatives, and customers at the bank where I worked, came forward with comfort, help and assistance. Going through a catastrophic loss is devasating for a family, and it doesn't end when the skies clear. It took me more than 6 months to see a nickel of insurance money, I had to find somewhere else to live in the interim, and the city condemned what was left of my house.
I also lost my sense of safety utterly. Children in our neighbourhood became hysterical when the skies got cloudy, and teachers said they refused to go outside at recess. I was plagued with what I now recognize as a form of PST, and I still feel terror in a windstorm. The suicide rate in our county went up 500% in the 12 months following the storm.
That you would make jokes about people going through a catastrophic loss, shows you to be a real piece of work.
The suicide
I feel for you, but you leftards are clueless.
Pay attention, Class, if you can. FEMA is not a charity. And anecdotes do not disprove generalities.Oh, I see. You're the world's charity case.When my parents` home took on 8 ft. of water from hurricane Ivan in 2004 the Salvation Army helped us with food and cleaning supplies during the emergency and the St. Vincent Depaul came through with a check for $150. FEMA wrote a check for $13,000 to help rebuild and replace things that were destroyed. $13,000 is a bit more than $150 and cleaning supplies. You think?Soup kitchens, shelters, famine and disaster relief, and all the rest. No government, no corporation, no other organization at all has been as charitable as Christianity has.
As someone who also experience the total loss of my home and everything in it, to a tornado, I find your comments beyond deplorable, but not unexpected. When I experienced this loss, family, friends, relatives, and customers at the bank where I worked, came forward with comfort, help and assistance. Going through a catastrophic loss is devasating for a family, and it doesn't end when the skies clear. It took me more than 6 months to see a nickel of insurance money, I had to find somewhere else to live in the interim, and the city condemned what was left of my house.
I also lost my sense of safety utterly. Children in our neighbourhood became hysterical when the skies got cloudy, and teachers said they refused to go outside at recess. I was plagued with what I now recognize as a form of PST, and I still feel terror in a windstorm. The suicide rate in our county went up 500% in the 12 months following the storm.
That you would make jokes about people going through a catastrophic loss, shows you to be a real piece of work.
The suicide
I feel for you, but you leftards are clueless.
Pay attention idiot because you don't have the brains God gave a fly. What generalities are you trying to prove?
I am not an American, I had full insurance coverage, and a very good job, and I was just fine, so don't condescend to me or try to mansplain government programs to me. You seem to be the one in need of an education.
The stated purpose of FEMA is to aid in the recovery of uninsured losses in a catastrophe. In reality, FEMA is a slush fund for companies like Haliburton, and other members of the elite service industry, to funnel funds to the donor class and mask it as Hurricane assistance. Haliburton received a $50 million contract from FEMA for clean up after Katrina.
So much for what passes for "aid", both foreign and domestic, is actually subsidies for donor class, masked as assistance for the poor or other citizens. Like the bailouts to corrupt mortgage companies and Wall Street brokers and nothing to the citizens who suffered when the housing bubble burst, large scale corporations were awarded untendered contracts to provide shelters and housing to victims of the storm. FEMA is a conduit between these corporate donors and taxpayer dollars.
Individual citizens are slow to receive aid until all of their claims are resolved. In Houston, victims of the storms not only lost their homes, many of their jobs were lost as their places of employment, stores and services were washed away as well. Knowing what I went through after the storm - I quickly realized how much more difficult their recovery would be. My community was mostly intact. A handful of neighbourhoods on the edge of the city - mostly newer executive homes, were destroyed utterly. Some streets looked like they had been bomobed. My children's school was still there, as were my job, and our hospitals and infrastructure.
That wasn't true in Houston. Entire sections of the city were completely destroyed - homes, schools, businesses and services. How would these people live until their claims were settled. Everyone talked like living through the storm, it's over you made it! No! You're torment is just beginning. I made it through because my community rallied around the victims of the storm, and helped us through, both financially and emotionally, and because I still had resources - a car, a job, and money in the bank, and a job.
Also, the insurance company is your friend, until you have a claim. At the point when you need them most, their only goal is to minimize your claim. From what I can understand, the FEMA adjusters are worse. While FEMA glad hands untendered contracts out to big government contractors, they nickel and dime every small business or homeowner they deal with.
If the unbelievers would support the Church like they're supposed to
Have you ever called the police about this stealing?
