Peter Strzok public testimony: 10:00 am ET, Thursday, July 12, 2018

[westwall]

He IS an arrogant little shit isn't he!

The president? I agree. But here is a man who rocks patriotism!



this video is incredible

For the russians, maybe. For the American People though, not so much, he has already stated that he holds the majority of Americans in contempt. Hard to despise someone who you supposedly love.

 

[westwall]

I'm watching the live feed on youtube and the comments are intense. And overwhelmingly AGAINST strzok, and the dems. It is pretty amazing that youtube is not halting the feed.

Youtube comments? LOL

Some of us watch these things on Cspan, where it can't be rigged by nutjobs

and why would they halt it? Some kind of conspiracy exists in your warped mind? LOL

Yeah, you should take a look. It blows your narrative right out of the water.

 

[westwall]

WASHINGTON — FBI agent Peter Strzok, whose disparaging text messages about President Donald Trump prompted his removal from the ongoing inquiry into Russia's interference in the 2016 election, is to give public testimony Thursday at a joint meeting of House committees.

The public hearing comes in the wake of an 11-hour, closed session last week with members of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees.

Angered by lawmakers' selective leaks of that meeting, Strzok's lawyer has called for the full transcript of that testimony to be released before Thursday's session. Strzok was subpoenaed earlier this week to testify publicly.

Peter Strzok, FBI agent who wrote anti-Trump texts, to testify publicly before lawmakers

Controversial FBI agent Peter Strzok’s upcoming hearing, explained

This sounds like must-see TV. Rachel Maddow did an extraordinary segment on Strzok a few minutes ago. I'll be watching. Will you...?

Notice how empty the chamber is now?

When Republicans walk out of their own witch hunt. You pretty much know they got embarrassed.

I'm watching the live feed on youtube and the comments are intense. And overwhelmingly AGAINST strzok, and the dems. It is pretty amazing that youtube is not halting the feed.

I'm sure they'll scrub their servers with Bleach Bit and a cloth or something by tomorrow.

That's OK. The Wayback Machine sees all, and saves all!

 

[boedicca]

WASHINGTON — FBI agent Peter Strzok, whose disparaging text messages about President Donald Trump prompted his removal from the ongoing inquiry into Russia's interference in the 2016 election, is to give public testimony Thursday at a joint meeting of House committees.

The public hearing comes in the wake of an 11-hour, closed session last week with members of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees.

Angered by lawmakers' selective leaks of that meeting, Strzok's lawyer has called for the full transcript of that testimony to be released before Thursday's session. Strzok was subpoenaed earlier this week to testify publicly.

Peter Strzok, FBI agent who wrote anti-Trump texts, to testify publicly before lawmakers

Controversial FBI agent Peter Strzok’s upcoming hearing, explained

This sounds like must-see TV. Rachel Maddow did an extraordinary segment on Strzok a few minutes ago. I'll be watching. Will you...?

Notice how empty the chamber is now?

When Republicans walk out of their own witch hunt. You pretty much know they got embarrassed.

I'm watching the live feed on youtube and the comments are intense. And overwhelmingly AGAINST strzok, and the dems. It is pretty amazing that youtube is not halting the feed.

I'm sure they'll scrub their servers with Bleach Bit and a cloth or something by tomorrow.

That's OK. The Wayback Machine sees all, and saves all!

And that's why the Left wants to censor the interwebs.

 

[ptbw forever]

NAMBLA is an entirely Democratic run special interest group with support from several Democratic members of Congress and local Democrats.

really? Are you an expert on NAMBLA?

Project away, idiot.

 

[westwall]

FINALLY, they ask him about obummers bullshit!

 

[JBvM]

He used a Government issued phone, idiot.

That undermines everything he says.

personal opinions on a government phone does not equate being innocent or guilty of any charge. LOL

Every single Congress person questioning Strzok has personal opinions.. are you suggesting only they put that aside, or you admitting like Gowdy has before that it's alla bullshit clown show for consumption by imbecile?

Which is it oh Wizard of Ahhas and Oooohs?

Republican Investigator Trey Gowdy Stops Pretending, Admits ‘This Is Politics’

 

[iceberg]

I agree. Him LYING to his wife, on the other hand, most certainly does.

No it doesn't. The head of law enforcement for the United States of America has cheated on multiple wives, but you want to give him a free pass. Give it the fuck up.

It's amazing how the left suddenly cares about morality when it comes to their political opponents, but ignore it when it comes to their own.

yup, and the Right never does that.

I don't ignore it, regardless of who does it. I want moral conservatives in my government.

Trump is so far from moral he cant even spell it - same goes for the pukes that support his sorry ass.

moral.

looks like you're dead wrong.

 

[easyt65]

'We will stop him. = 'No Bias'.

'Nuff said.

'Nuff has not been said.

Personal views do not equal bias. How can Congress hold hearings when they are biased. As Strzok said, there are checks and balances built into a FBI investigation so 1 person cannot stop a FBI investigation. That is the same point the IG report made. Strzok did not have the power to alter a FBI investigation. Also the fact that he supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails after new ones had been discovered shows the lack of bias.

The number 2 countet-intelligence specialist in the United States, a proven Trump hating liberal, who declared that the FBI did not want Trump to become president, that they could not leave that to risk and needed a back-up plan, and who declared we will stop him, was in charge at some point of both the multiple investigations of The Proven felon Hillary Clinton - where it was proven that he helped make sure she was not indicted and went to prison as she deserve to - but was also in charge of the counter terrorist operation against the GOP candidate and his team...

...and you claim to see no conflict of interest and / or bias.

If that is what you are saying then you have just proven yourself to be a short bus riding, window licking, mouth foaming Ultra partisan leftist extremist idiot...which is why I don't think you really meant to say that.

 

[JBvM]

FINALLY, they ask him about obummers bullshit!

Republican Investigator Trey Gowdy Stops Pretending, Admits ‘This Is Politics’

Bullshit politics. We have it from the mouth of on e of the Chairmen

“Congressional investigations unfortunately are usually overtly political investigations, where it is to one side’s advantage to drag things out,” says Gowdy. “The notion that one side is playing the part of defense attorney and that the other side is just these white-hat defenders of the truth is laughable … This is politics.”

 

[boedicca]

Strzok looks SO GUILTY.

 

[busybee01]

That is like being called ugly by something ugly/ Gohmert is a bad joke whose brains are in his ass.

Why because he nails libs to the wall?

He demonstrates his bias and stupidity. Independents tune him out.

 

[Lakhota]

Unlike the partisan hacks who are grilling him - Strzok is a great American patriot.

 

[westwall]

And now they are dismantling the claim that the IG report found no bias. The IG report most certainly DID find evidence that bias affected the investigation. And now, all of a sudden strzok is answering questions that he told the panel he couldn't. He should learn to shut up. He just buried himself.

 

[JBvM]

Yeah, you should take a look. It blows your narrative right out of the water.

Please, your conspiracy laden mind is a disease that should trouble anyone who knows you

youtube crowds are not representative of anything meaningful

and youtube has no agenda other than making loads of cash... think Trump with a successful platform

 

[westwall]

Unlike the partisan hacks who are grilling him - Strzok is a great American patriot.

For his russian masters maybe. Not for us who he very clearly despises.

 

[SSGT Bags]

WASHINGTON — FBI agent Peter Strzok, whose disparaging text messages about President Donald Trump prompted his removal from the ongoing inquiry into Russia's interference in the 2016 election, is to give public testimony Thursday at a joint meeting of House committees.

The public hearing comes in the wake of an 11-hour, closed session last week with members of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees.

Angered by lawmakers' selective leaks of that meeting, Strzok's lawyer has called for the full transcript of that testimony to be released before Thursday's session. Strzok was subpoenaed earlier this week to testify publicly.

Peter Strzok, FBI agent who wrote anti-Trump texts, to testify publicly before lawmakers

Controversial FBI agent Peter Strzok’s upcoming hearing, explained

This sounds like must-see TV. Rachel Maddow did an extraordinary segment on Strzok a few minutes ago. I'll be watching. Will you...?

I wouldn't turn on Richard Madcow if MSNBC was the only channel working.

 

[westwall]

Yeah, you should take a look. It blows your narrative right out of the water.

Please, your conspiracy laden mind is a disease that should trouble anyone who knows you

Compared to most who know me I am mild.

 

[JBvM]

Strzok looks SO GUILTY.

really? You mean he looks like Trump?

What glasses are you wearing

 

[BS Filter]

I agree. Him LYING to his wife, on the other hand, most certainly does.

No it doesn't. The head of law enforcement for the United States of America has cheated on multiple wives, but you want to give him a free pass. Give it the fuck up.

It's amazing how the left suddenly cares about morality when it comes to their political opponents, but ignore it when it comes to their own.

What? Do you have a comprehension problem? It is not me that started this. I was quoting a REPUBLICAN congressman who brought it up today in this hearing, and then Westwall who is defending him and trying to distance Trump from doing the exact same act MULTIPLE TIMES.

Trump isn't being investigated here.

You have to hold EVERYONE to the same standard. That's what the American judicial system is about. Anyone can be on trial at some time.

I do. I wish democrats did.