PINO trump just pardoned kkk, alt right Arpaio

[busybee01]

So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?

No moron......he was enforcing the law.....and you left wing nut jobs can't stand that....so a left wing, social justice warrior, pretending to be a judge, denied him a jury trial and pronounced a sentence on him.....moron.

How the fuck can a judge deny a man, a jury of his peers anyhow? Sounds like Joes Conviction was the product of a kangaroo court. Well President Trump!

A judge can cite a individual for contempt of court. It does not require a jury. You cite a irrelevancy to justify depriving citizens of their constitutional rights.

 

[Montrovant]

Trump has pardoned a man who was literally, to the letter, convicted of racism.

No one should be surprised that Trump the racist would choose to let a racist off the hook.

Literally.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trump has pardoned a man who was literally, to the letter, convicted of racism.

No one should be surprised that Trump the racist would choose to let a racist off the hook.

Literally.

Yes, I know, 'literally' is a bad word. Give me a better one to say the same thing I'm saying there.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?

Are you that passionate when Obama and Clinton pardoned criminals or is the just an outrage because you disagree with a Presidents politics?

Does the merit or propriety of Trump pardoning Arpaio have ANYTHING to do with how some poster viewed some other pardon?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trump just lost 10 percentage points among Hispanic voters.

OMG! OMG! OMG!

You never get smarter do you?

lol, you really think this helps Trump politically?

With WHO?

No you pathetically stupid person, it has no effect at all. You just never get smarter do you?

How would you know? I know it hurts Trump because it hurts him among moderate Hispanics who might have voted for him last November.

No, you don't know that at all. Moderate Hispanics want something done about illegal immigration. Especially those who voted for him last November.

I edited your last statement to send it back in time to before the election: "I know it hurts Trump because it hurts him among moderate Hispanics who might vote for him in November."

Look familiar? It should.

Let's see if you get smarter.

Trump didn't pardon anyone before the election you moron.

 

[Montrovant]

Pino? Cheeto?

How many more juvenile names can the left come up with? Are they consulting 5th graders for insults?

Juvenile insults are in no way exclusive to "the left."

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Pino? Cheeto?

How many more juvenile names can the left come up with? Are they consulting 5th graders for insults?

Juvenile insults are in no way exclusive to "the left."

I know

 

[busybee01]

Scumbag sheriff never served time.

Scumbag sheriff never showed remorse.

Dumbass PINO never got recommendation from Pardon attorney or DOJ.

This is a PINO pardon of a lawless man who wore a badge.

Fuck this country and it's goddamn PINO.

We suck.

Here's the door. Don't let us keep you. No one here holding you back. Do us all a favor and leave. When it gets to the point that people start thinking that just enforcing our laws is such a horrible thing, we are far better off without you.

Violating people's constitutional rights is not enforcing the law. The Constitution would be better off without you in this country.

How did he violate their constitutional rights?

He picked people of certain ethnic origins off the street and demanded they prove their immigration status. As Rep Justin Amash pointed out, this violates their 4th Amendment rights.

Justin Amash‏
Verified account
@justinamash 14h
14 hours ago
Arpaio was convicted of defying court order to stop violating #4thAmendment. It's a pardon of a govt
official who ignored Bill of Rights

 

[Montrovant]

Trump has pardoned a man who was literally, to the letter, convicted of racism.

No one should be surprised that Trump the racist would choose to let a racist off the hook.

Literally.

Yes, I know, 'literally' is a bad word. Give me a better one to say the same thing I'm saying there.

You could have said that Arpaio was, in effect, convicted of racism.

I disagree with the sentiment. If you were to argue that Arpaio was, in effect, convicted of ethnic profiling......that would seem a lot more accurate to me.

 

[Avatar4321]

So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?

No moron......he was enforcing the law.....and you left wing nut jobs can't stand that....so a left wing, social justice warrior, pretending to be a judge, denied him a jury trial and pronounced a sentence on him.....moron.

How the fuck can a judge deny a man, a jury of his peers anyhow? Sounds like Joes Conviction was the product of a kangaroo court. Well President Trump!

A judge can cite a individual for contempt of court. It does not require a jury. You cite a irrelevancy to justify depriving citizens of their constitutional rights.

How does being pardoned deprive anyone of their constitutional rights?

 

[bripat9643]

Scumbag sheriff never served time.

Scumbag sheriff never showed remorse.

Dumbass PINO never got recommendation from Pardon attorney or DOJ.

This is a PINO pardon of a lawless man who wore a badge.

Fuck this country and it's goddamn PINO.

We suck.

Here's the door. Don't let us keep you. No one here holding you back. Do us all a favor and leave. When it gets to the point that people start thinking that just enforcing our laws is such a horrible thing, we are far better off without you.

Violating people's constitutional rights is not enforcing the law. The Constitution would be better off without you in this country.

How did he violate their constitutional rights?

He picked people of certain ethnic origins off the street and demanded they prove their immigration status. As Rep Justin Amash pointed out, this violates their 4th Amendment rights.

Justin Amash‏
Verified account
@justinamash 14h
14 hours ago
Arpaio was convicted of defying court order to stop violating #4thAmendment. It's a pardon of a govt
official who ignored Bill of Rights

I doubt he just "picked them off the street."

 

[Montrovant]

So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?

Are you that passionate when Obama and Clinton pardoned criminals or is the just an outrage because you disagree with a Presidents politics?

Does the merit or propriety of Trump pardoning Arpaio have ANYTHING to do with how some poster viewed some other pardon?

How a poster viewed the pardons of previous presidents can be evidence of whether the outrage about this particular pardon might be based more on opposition to Trump than belief that the pardon is a particularly bad thing.

Arpaio was convicted of a minor offense. Presidents since Washington have been granting pardons, often to people convicted of far more severe crimes. If someone has never before cared about presidential pardons, it brings up the question of why it is such a big deal now.

 

[Avatar4321]

Trump has pardoned a man who was literally, to the letter, convicted of racism.

No one should be surprised that Trump the racist would choose to let a racist off the hook.

Literally.

Yes, I know, 'literally' is a bad word. Give me a better one to say the same thing I'm saying there.

How about "Completely unrelated"? Much more accurate

 

[busybee01]

It's incredible. Profiling is what we all do, we all look at situations and the facts and put them together and assess them in a fitting matter. It's too bad THAT those facts offend people, but you can't afford to overlook them because of fickle politics and sentiments.

So a county cop should enforce federal law he has no jurisdiction in?

Federal law covers his county, dickhead.

The Supreme Court laid out how much latitude local law enforcement has in enforcing immigration law. Arpaio violated those constraints. You clearly do not believe in people's constitutional rights.

 

[Vastator]

So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?

No moron......he was enforcing the law.....and you left wing nut jobs can't stand that....so a left wing, social justice warrior, pretending to be a judge, denied him a jury trial and pronounced a sentence on him.....moron.

How the fuck can a judge deny a man, a jury of his peers anyhow? Sounds like Joes Conviction was the product of a kangaroo court. Well President Trump!

A judge can cite a individual for contempt of court. It does not require a jury. You cite a irrelevancy to justify depriving citizens of their constitutional rights.

No one was deprived. And if they were; tbat wohld be a federal case. If it was a federal civil rigbts case, it would have gone to jury. Interesting to see how excited you libs get at the thought of jailing your political enemies withoit due process. Very telling of your fascistic ways. Just one of the many reasons your kind have been systematically voted out of office...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trump has pardoned a man who was literally, to the letter, convicted of racism.

No one should be surprised that Trump the racist would choose to let a racist off the hook.

Literally.

Yes, I know, 'literally' is a bad word. Give me a better one to say the same thing I'm saying there.

How about "Completely unrelated"? Much more accurate

What was Arpaio convicted of? Apparently you have no clue.

 

[busybee01]

The upside is Trump knows he's running out of time and he's doing everything he can to cause havoc and piss off everyone who made fun of him.

He's a child.

TRUMP is a true Patriot.... America First. Think of it... President Trump volunteered without pay to try and get our country back. Why would a billionaire submit himself to such an enormous task when he could simply enjoy his life and riches ? You did know he donates his pay didn't you? Please educate yourself on facts instead of Fake News.

He is lining his pockets with taxpayer dollars. Even when he goes golfing, taxpayers pay for rental of his golf carts. You need to educate yourself on the facts.

 

[Papageorgio]

So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?

Are you that passionate when Obama and Clinton pardoned criminals or is the just an outrage because you disagree with a Presidents politics?

Does the merit or propriety of Trump pardoning Arpaio have ANYTHING to do with how some poster viewed some other pardon?

It seems to. Politics seem to have a lot more to do with this than does anything else. The left didn't mind Marc Rich being pardoned, you know the former FBI's top ten most wanted person. The sheriff is for contempt of court. So politics plays deep into this. So if you want to bitch about the sheriff, then be fair and bitch about them all.

 

[Synthaholic]

As Soledad O'Brien just pointed out on Twitter, accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt. And once you accept a pardon you no longer can plead the fifth. He is only pardoned for criminal acts, and that admission of guilt will be used in civil cases against him.

 

[Papageorgio]

It's incredible. Profiling is what we all do, we all look at situations and the facts and put them together and assess them in a fitting matter. It's too bad THAT those facts offend people, but you can't afford to overlook them because of fickle politics and sentiments.

So a county cop should enforce federal law he has no jurisdiction in?

Federal law covers his county, dickhead.

The Supreme Court laid out how much latitude local law enforcement has in enforcing immigration law. Arpaio violated those constraints. You clearly do not believe in people's constitutional rights.

That is a pretty silly conclusion, not believing in people's rights? A little drama there.