Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Violating people's constitutional rights is not enforcing the law. The Constitution would be better off without you in this country.
Dear ButtheadBee,
Illegal Aliens invading our country HAVE NO Constitutional rights, but the Law DOES have an obligation to enforce our laws. Three Cheers to Joe and hope for MORE LIKE HIM to bust you illegals once and for all OUT OF MY COUNTRY. You want to come here? Apply for citizenship or a Visa, then we can talk. Until then, DROP DEAD.
So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?
Are you that passionate when Obama and Clinton pardoned criminals or is the just an outrage because you disagree with a Presidents politics?
Does the merit or propriety of Trump pardoning Arpaio have ANYTHING to do with how some poster viewed some other pardon?
How a poster viewed the pardons of previous presidents can be evidence of whether the outrage about this particular pardon might be based more on opposition to Trump than belief that the pardon is a particularly bad thing.
Arpaio was convicted of a minor offense. Presidents since Washington have been granting pardons, often to people convicted of far more severe crimes. If someone has never before cared about presidential pardons, it brings up the question of why it is such a big deal now.
Holy crap Jim, I swear, the wingers are losing their minds more by the fucking day.Because the Congressional caucuses of both parties are led by mental midgets.The only "wins" he's getting has been making small, individual, unilateral decisions that anyone in that chair could make.Trump just keeps racking up Win after Win after Win, despite having the entire establishment arrayed against him.
The big stuff? Repeal & Replace? Tax Reform? The Wall? Trade? Race Relations? Not so much.
.
McConnel and Schumer are more to blame for the failure (so far) to replace/repair Obamacare.
Please point out the law he didn't follow. I laughed when I asked that question.He didn't follow the law in pardoning that Arizona piece of shit. The law said that racist fucker should do time and the racist fucker in the White House stopped that.That's funny considering he actually follows the law whereas your douche bag messiah ignored it.
Once again, Mexican is not a race. What in the world is wrong with you people?
So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?
Are you that passionate when Obama and Clinton pardoned criminals or is the just an outrage because you disagree with a Presidents politics?
Does the merit or propriety of Trump pardoning Arpaio have ANYTHING to do with how some poster viewed some other pardon?
How a poster viewed the pardons of previous presidents can be evidence of whether the outrage about this particular pardon might be based more on opposition to Trump than belief that the pardon is a particularly bad thing.
Arpaio was convicted of a minor offense. Presidents since Washington have been granting pardons, often to people convicted of far more severe crimes. If someone has never before cared about presidential pardons, it brings up the question of why it is such a big deal now.
So if a poster comes along who says that Trump was wrong to pardon Arpaio, AND that poster also says that Obama was wrong to pardon so and so, AND Clinton was wrong to pardon so and so,
that proves that Trump was in fact wrong to pardon Arpaio?
Joe was convicted because he wouldn't obey a judge's order to
NOT enforce the law.
That's why these illegals have stopped coming here now. At least,
not coming in droves.
Border Patrol doesn't follow Obama's directive of detain and release.
They detain or boot them back across. Ain't none of this releasing
crap.
So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?
Are you that passionate when Obama and Clinton pardoned criminals or is the just an outrage because you disagree with a Presidents politics?
Does the merit or propriety of Trump pardoning Arpaio have ANYTHING to do with how some poster viewed some other pardon?
How a poster viewed the pardons of previous presidents can be evidence of whether the outrage about this particular pardon might be based more on opposition to Trump than belief that the pardon is a particularly bad thing.
Arpaio was convicted of a minor offense. Presidents since Washington have been granting pardons, often to people convicted of far more severe crimes. If someone has never before cared about presidential pardons, it brings up the question of why it is such a big deal now.
So if a poster comes along who says that Trump was wrong to pardon Arpaio, AND that poster also says that Obama was wrong to pardon so and so, AND Clinton was wrong to pardon so and so,
that proves that Trump was in fact wrong to pardon Arpaio?
It shows consistency, why would it be okay to pardon a Marc Rich a Scooter Libby and not Arpaio who's crime was much less?
Fuck this country and it's goddamn PINO. We suck.
Because he was a law enforcement official who violated the constitutional rights of American citizens. He believed he was above the Constitution and above the law.
The issue isn’t the severity of the offense but its nature.So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?
Are you that passionate when Obama and Clinton pardoned criminals or is the just an outrage because you disagree with a Presidents politics?
Does the merit or propriety of Trump pardoning Arpaio have ANYTHING to do with how some poster viewed some other pardon?
How a poster viewed the pardons of previous presidents can be evidence of whether the outrage about this particular pardon might be based more on opposition to Trump than belief that the pardon is a particularly bad thing.
Arpaio was convicted of a minor offense. Presidents since Washington have been granting pardons, often to people convicted of far more severe crimes. If someone has never before cared about presidential pardons, it brings up the question of why it is such a big deal now.
No one was deprived. And if they were; tbat wohld be a federal case. If it was a federal civil rigbts case, it would have gone to jury. Interesting to see how excited you libs get at the thought of jailing your political enemies withoit due process. Very telling of your fascistic ways. Just one of the many reasons your kind have been systematically voted out of office...How the fuck can a judge deny a man, a jury of his peers anyhow? Sounds like Joes Conviction was the product of a kangaroo court. Well President Trump!So to all you Republicans who flaunt the word Un-American. The president of the United States, just used his prerogative of pardoning to excuse someone who openly, blatantly and knowingly defied the fourth amendment and got convicted for it. It's legal, but its also a direct assault on the founding fathers who envisiont the judicial as the ultimate protectors of the constitution. What does the rule of law mean when a president pardons his allies because he feels the constitution can be tossed when he doesn't agree with it?
No moron......he was enforcing the law.....and you left wing nut jobs can't stand that....so a left wing, social justice warrior, pretending to be a judge, denied him a jury trial and pronounced a sentence on him.....moron.
A judge can cite a individual for contempt of court. It does not require a jury. You cite a irrelevancy to justify depriving citizens of their constitutional rights.
Pino? Cheeto?
How many more juvenile names can the left come up with? Are they consulting 5th graders for insults?
Because he was a law enforcement official who violated the constitutional rights of American citizens. He believed he was above the Constitution and above the law.
He cut through the B.S. red tape to enforce our laws. So far as Im concerned that person should has come with a Presidential Medal of Freedom attached to it.
Trump has pardoned a man who was literally, to the letter, convicted of racism.
No one should be surprised that Trump the racist would choose to let a racist off the hook.
Literally.
Yes, I know, 'literally' is a bad word. Give me a better one to say the same thing I'm saying there.
How about "Completely unrelated"? Much more accurate
What was Arpaio convicted of? Apparently you have no clue.
