Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,438
- 2,290
I understand exactly what regressive means. Percentage of income is not a valid measurement in determining what each person pays for the exact same government, imho. It’s a liberal feel-good equation used to justify charging some individuals a far greater actual amount for the same product. If anything, charge everyone who wants a say in spending (a vote) a minimal tax, and have most government services funded by user fees. If you have kids in public school, you pay a user fee for that service, for example.
I couldn't agree more. I hate paying the thousands per year to educate the kids of people I don't know or ever even met. The former Section 8 family next to me had three kids in the system plus the ghetto kids from other family members living here and they of course didn't have to pay a dime. The landlord got the money from Section 8, he paid the property taxes, and they had a free suburban home with school.
On the other hand me nor any of my tenants ever had a kid in this school system in the 35 years I lived here. When I filed to have my taxes lowered because they were too high, they made me come downtown for a hearing and guess who was there? The lawyer for the school system to fight my claim.