Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you agree that it has been discussed before and debunked. Thanks for agreeing that neither Powel or rice used a server in their own home that they owned..............................That said it is a fact that 9 out of 10 schizophrenics do not know the difference between a personal email and a personal server.This has been discussed before, so no you don't get "just once more." The OP blew up.Please post the evidence that Powel and Rice used a server that they owned to send and receive all of their email. this is not real, however to a schizophrenic reality is created minute by minute.Now that Please provide evidence that Colin powel and Condi Rice used a personal server has fallen apart let's see how long bass and sniveling grizz play the fools.
They both seem trying to act like a drug addled brain scrambled young millennial in a half way house. I hope they have their essential oils.
She did no such thing.HRC voted for the war
Tell Hilly that, because she says that her Iraq was vote was a mistake. Hillary Clinton says her Iraq war vote was a 'mistake'She did no such thing.HRC voted for the war
A vote to authorize the use of force is not a vote for war.
To vote to authorize force is a vote to authorize war. That is how it is interpreted. You don't like the fact, meh.She did no such thing.HRC voted for the war
A vote to authorize the use of force is not a vote for war.
Yes - it was a mistake to trust George W. Bush to keep his word when he said he would let the inspectors finish their work, and that he would only go to war as a last resort.Tell Hilly that, because she says that her Iraq was vote was a mistake. Hillary Clinton says her Iraq war vote was a 'mistake'
You changed what I said to make it fit your argument, and it's still wrong!To vote to authorize force is a vote to authorize war. That is how it is interpreted. You don't like the fact, meh.She did no such thing.HRC voted for the war
A vote to authorize the use of force is not a vote for war.
The fact is that if Hillary voted no along with others, then there would have been no war. Can you grasp this?Yes - it was a mistake to trust George W. Bush to keep his word when he said he would let the inspectors finish their work, and that he would only go to war as a last resort.Tell Hilly that, because she says that her Iraq was vote was a mistake. Hillary Clinton says her Iraq war vote was a 'mistake'
That was definitely a mistake.
The fact is that if Hillary voted no with others, then the war does not happen, but she voted yes.Yes - it was a mistake to trust George W. Bush to keep his word when he said he would let the inspectors finish their work, and that he would only go to war as a last resort.Tell Hilly that, because she says that her Iraq was vote was a mistake. Hillary Clinton says her Iraq war vote was a 'mistake'
That was definitely a mistake.
No, you are saying an Authorization of Force is not a Declaration of War. In fact, they are the same. So stop changing what I am saying.You changed what I said to make it fit your argument, and it's still wrong!To vote to authorize force is a vote to authorize war. That is how it is interpreted. You don't like the fact, meh.She did no such thing.HRC voted for the war
A vote to authorize the use of force is not a vote for war.
Hillary voted for the war, her vote with enough other Democrats would have meant no war. Why this is being disputed is beyond me"The fact is that if Hillary "voted no with others, then the war does not happen" is a lie.
There is no evidence that a HRC no vote would have prevented war. None.
Anyone who is saying that is mentally unbalanced and needs to take meds.
Because you are crazy to think that. Your opinion is not fact. There is no corroborating evidence at all to suggest it.Hillary voted for the war, her vote with enough other Democrats would have meant no war. Why this is being disputed is beyond me"The fact is that if Hillary "voted no with others, then the war does not happen" is a lie.
There is no evidence that a HRC no vote would have prevented war. None.
Anyone who is saying that is mentally unbalanced and needs to take meds.
If Bush went to war without a majority yes vote, he would have been impeached, he was not because the vote including hillarie's was YES.Because you are crazy to think that. Your opinion is not fact. There is no corroborating evidence at all to suggest it.Hillary voted for the war, her vote with enough other Democrats would have meant no war. Why this is being disputed is beyond me"The fact is that if Hillary "voted no with others, then the war does not happen" is a lie.
There is no evidence that a HRC no vote would have prevented war. None.
Anyone who is saying that is mentally unbalanced and needs to take meds.
History is not on your side at all.If Bush went to war without a majority yes vote, he would have been impeached, he was not because the vote including hillarie's was YES.Because you are crazy to think that. Your opinion is not fact. There is no corroborating evidence at all to suggest it.Hillary voted for the war, her vote with enough other Democrats would have meant no war. Why this is being disputed is beyond me"The fact is that if Hillary "voted no with others, then the war does not happen" is a lie.
There is no evidence that a HRC no vote would have prevented war. None.
Anyone who is saying that is mentally unbalanced and needs to take meds.
Get over it already, you are arguing with history, not me.
History is not on your side at all.If Bush went to war without a majority yes vote, he would have been impeached, he was not because the vote including hillarie's was YES.Because you are crazy to think that. Your opinion is not fact. There is no corroborating evidence at all to suggest it.Hillary voted for the war, her vote with enough other Democrats would have meant no war. Why this is being disputed is beyond me"The fact is that if Hillary "voted no with others, then the war does not happen" is a lie.
There is no evidence that a HRC no vote would have prevented war. None.
Anyone who is saying that is mentally unbalanced and needs to take meds.
Get over it already, you are arguing with history, not me.
Show how her vote would have invalidated the vote for authorization of force?
United States Senate (check wikipedia)
Party Yeas Nays
Republican 48 1
Democratic 29 21
Independent 0 1
TOTALS 77 23
Her one vote meant nothing.
You, bass, are arguing with factual history.
Total unsubstantiated nonsense.
Clinton's server was the same server used by a former president. To assume that there was no security is just dumb.
Because you are crazy to think that. Your opinion is not fact. There is no corroborating evidence at all to suggest it.[/QUOTE]Hillary voted for the war, her vote with enough other Democrats would have meant no war. Why this is being disputed is beyond me
They are not the same.No, you are saying an Authorization of Force is not a Declaration of War. In fact, they are the same. So stop changing what I am saying.You changed what I said to make it fit your argument, and it's still wrong!To vote to authorize force is a vote to authorize war. That is how it is interpreted. You don't like the fact, meh.She did no such thing.HRC voted for the war
A vote to authorize the use of force is not a vote for war.
That's a lie. You're a liar.Hillary voted to send troops into Iraq
