Plutocracy or Democracy? YOU will decide in Nov. 2016!

[Wry Catcher]

The fact that GMU & Keys are so sure that 2 + 2 always = 4 is a prime example, and provides probative evidence, that both lack imagination, ... .

LOL! That is ADORABLE!

Of course, in reality, thus in truth, the equation, 2+2=4 remains true and valid, anywhere, at any time, simultaneously, anywhere in the universe, within the paradigm of that which is otherwise known as 'reality'; which is to say the scope of space/time in which humanity exists.

What our in-house member of the Intellectually Less Fortunate is clumsily trying to convey, is an addled expression of thought which rejects the confinement of the laws of mathematical constructs.

Which is to say that they offer an equation, which established, through the construct of the equation, that for which the reader is to find, which in this case is two sets of the value 2, which are to simply be summed. Where one sums two sets of the value 2, the solution is always 4.

What dingus is needs to do is to secretly redefine the equation. Wherein it resets the value 2 and defines it as 1 Peach and One Apple. Therefore it can claim that 2+2=2 peaches and two apples.

Of course in so doing, it alters the equation without the knowledge of the individual answering it. In effect changing well established rules and simply pretending that the new rules are as valid as the the old rules. When in reality, the equation, in terms of values and operations are set ... altering the terms without presenting the new terms in a new equation: is INVALID.

Which is the lie that all 'alternative' math establish. The consequence of 2+2 can be expressed in many ways... 1+1+1+1, 2+1+1, -1+5, 1,000,000 - 999,996 and so on.

But in No WAY does that mean that 2+2, sometimes equals something other than 4.

What it should have offered is how the idiocy it is selling was originally advanced in the 1970s when I was first introduced to it: "2 and 2 doesn't always add up to four!".

But to do that risks that the reader will be tipped off to the trick... which again that it is redefining the terms presented by implication in the verbal exchange, which is being withheld from the individual.

It's no less pitiful than making up your own language and laughing at people who can't understand what you claim to be 'saying'. Which you've no doubt recognized in other areas of the Left, where they use words like 'liberal' to represent the antithesis of the advocacy of liberty... and "Gay" to represent the shameful behavior of the sexual deviant. It all serves the same purpose, which of course, is Deceit, FRAUDULENTLY advanced as a means to influence the Ignorant.

ROFL!

So pitiful...

This once again demonstrating the foolish nature of the Ideological Left... comprised entirely of children and fools.

This is a distraction and you are playing into it.

The straw man of 2+2 does not always = 4 is meaningless to the actual thread.

It does in context, and I suggest you not use "Straw Man" until you research its actual meaning.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The fact that GMU & Keys are so sure that 2 + 2 always = 4 is a prime example, and provides probative evidence, that both lack imagination, ... .

LOL! That is ADORABLE!

Of course, in reality, thus in truth, the equation, 2+2=4 remains true and valid, anywhere, at any time, simultaneously, anywhere in the universe, within the paradigm of that which is otherwise known as 'reality'; which is to say the scope of space/time in which humanity exists.

What our in-house member of the Intellectually Less Fortunate is clumsily trying to convey, is an addled expression of thought which rejects the confinement of the laws of mathematical constructs.

Which is to say that they offer an equation, which established, through the construct of the equation, that for which the reader is to find, which in this case is two sets of the value 2, which are to simply be summed. Where one sums two sets of the value 2, the solution is always 4.

What dingus is needs to do is to secretly redefine the equation. Wherein it resets the value 2 and defines it as 1 Peach and One Apple. Therefore it can claim that 2+2=2 peaches and two apples.

Of course in so doing, it alters the equation without the knowledge of the individual answering it. In effect changing well established rules and simply pretending that the new rules are as valid as the the old rules. When in reality, the equation, in terms of values and operations are set ... altering the terms without presenting the new terms in a new equation: is INVALID.

Which is the lie that all 'alternative' math establish. The consequence of 2+2 can be expressed in many ways... 1+1+1+1, 2+1+1, -1+5, 1,000,000 - 999,996 and so on.

But in No WAY does that mean that 2+2, sometimes equals something other than 4.

What it should have offered is how the idiocy it is selling was originally advanced in the 1970s when I was first introduced to it: "2 and 2 doesn't always add up to four!".

But to do that risks that the reader will be tipped off to the trick... which again that it is redefining the terms presented by implication in the verbal exchange, which is being withheld from the individual.

It's no less pitiful than making up your own language and laughing at people who can't understand what you claim to be 'saying'. Which you've no doubt recognized in other areas of the Left, where they use words like 'liberal' to represent the antithesis of the advocacy of liberty... and "Gay" to represent the shameful behavior of the sexual deviant. It all serves the same purpose, which of course, is Deceit, FRAUDULENTLY advanced as a means to influence the Ignorant.

ROFL!

So pitiful...

This once again demonstrating the foolish nature of the Ideological Left... comprised entirely of children and fools.

This is a distraction and you are playing into it.

The straw man of 2+2 does not always = 4 is meaningless to the actual thread.

It does in context, and I suggest you not use "Straw Man" until you research its actual meaning.

Straw man was used correctly, as that is precisely the form that your deflection took.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The fact that GMU & Keys are so sure that 2 + 2 always = 4 is a prime example, and provides probative evidence, that both lack imagination, ... .

LOL! That is ADORABLE!

Of course, in reality, thus in truth, the equation, 2+2=4 remains true and valid, anywhere, at any time, simultaneously, anywhere in the universe, within the paradigm of that which is otherwise known as 'reality'; which is to say the scope of space/time in which humanity exists.

What our in-house member of the Intellectually Less Fortunate is clumsily trying to convey, is an addled expression of thought which rejects the confinement of the laws of mathematical constructs.

Which is to say that they offer an equation, which established, through the construct of the equation, that for which the reader is to find, which in this case is two sets of the value 2, which are to simply be summed. Where one sums two sets of the value 2, the solution is always 4.

What dingus is needs to do is to secretly redefine the equation. Wherein it resets the value 2 and defines it as 1 Peach and One Apple. Therefore it can claim that 2+2=2 peaches and two apples.

Of course in so doing, it alters the equation without the knowledge of the individual answering it. In effect changing well established rules and simply pretending that the new rules are as valid as the the old rules. When in reality, the equation, in terms of values and operations are set ... altering the terms without presenting the new terms in a new equation: is INVALID.

Which is the lie that all 'alternative' math establish. The consequence of 2+2 can be expressed in many ways... 1+1+1+1, 2+1+1, -1+5, 1,000,000 - 999,996 and so on.

But in No WAY does that mean that 2+2, sometimes equals something other than 4.

What it should have offered is how the idiocy it is selling was originally advanced in the 1970s when I was first introduced to it: "2 and 2 doesn't always add up to four!".

But to do that risks that the reader will be tipped off to the trick... which again that it is redefining the terms presented by implication in the verbal exchange, which is being withheld from the individual.

It's no less pitiful than making up your own language and laughing at people who can't understand what you claim to be 'saying'. Which you've no doubt recognized in other areas of the Left, where they use words like 'liberal' to represent the antithesis of the advocacy of liberty... and "Gay" to represent the shameful behavior of the sexual deviant. It all serves the same purpose, which of course, is Deceit, FRAUDULENTLY advanced as a means to influence the Ignorant.

ROFL!

So pitiful...

This once again demonstrating the foolish nature of the Ideological Left... comprised entirely of children and fools.

This is a distraction and you are playing into it.

The straw man of 2+2 does not always = 4 is meaningless to the actual thread.

It does in context, and I suggest you not use "Straw Man" until you research its actual meaning.

Straw man was used correctly, as that is precisely the form that your deflection took.

Ignorant and dishonest ^^^; it's no wonder Rabbi(t) is your (only) fan.

Your logical fallacy is strawman

Now post the argument you want others to believe meets the definition of a Straw Man!

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Guys, ignore George Soros, the elephant in the room.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The fact that GMU & Keys are so sure that 2 + 2 always = 4 is a prime example, and provides probative evidence, that both lack imagination, ... .

LOL! That is ADORABLE!

Of course, in reality, thus in truth, the equation, 2+2=4 remains true and valid, anywhere, at any time, simultaneously, anywhere in the universe, within the paradigm of that which is otherwise known as 'reality'; which is to say the scope of space/time in which humanity exists.

What our in-house member of the Intellectually Less Fortunate is clumsily trying to convey, is an addled expression of thought which rejects the confinement of the laws of mathematical constructs.

Which is to say that they offer an equation, which established, through the construct of the equation, that for which the reader is to find, which in this case is two sets of the value 2, which are to simply be summed. Where one sums two sets of the value 2, the solution is always 4.

What dingus is needs to do is to secretly redefine the equation. Wherein it resets the value 2 and defines it as 1 Peach and One Apple. Therefore it can claim that 2+2=2 peaches and two apples.

Of course in so doing, it alters the equation without the knowledge of the individual answering it. In effect changing well established rules and simply pretending that the new rules are as valid as the the old rules. When in reality, the equation, in terms of values and operations are set ... altering the terms without presenting the new terms in a new equation: is INVALID.

Which is the lie that all 'alternative' math establish. The consequence of 2+2 can be expressed in many ways... 1+1+1+1, 2+1+1, -1+5, 1,000,000 - 999,996 and so on.

But in No WAY does that mean that 2+2, sometimes equals something other than 4.

What it should have offered is how the idiocy it is selling was originally advanced in the 1970s when I was first introduced to it: "2 and 2 doesn't always add up to four!".

But to do that risks that the reader will be tipped off to the trick... which again that it is redefining the terms presented by implication in the verbal exchange, which is being withheld from the individual.

It's no less pitiful than making up your own language and laughing at people who can't understand what you claim to be 'saying'. Which you've no doubt recognized in other areas of the Left, where they use words like 'liberal' to represent the antithesis of the advocacy of liberty... and "Gay" to represent the shameful behavior of the sexual deviant. It all serves the same purpose, which of course, is Deceit, FRAUDULENTLY advanced as a means to influence the Ignorant.

ROFL!

So pitiful...

This once again demonstrating the foolish nature of the Ideological Left... comprised entirely of children and fools.

This is a distraction and you are playing into it.

The straw man of 2+2 does not always = 4 is meaningless to the actual thread.

It does in context, and I suggest you not use "Straw Man" until you research its actual meaning.

Straw man was used correctly, as that is precisely the form that your deflection took.

Ignorant and dishonest ^^^; it's no wonder Rabbi(t) is your (only) fan.

Your logical fallacy is strawman

Now post the argument you want others to believe meets the definition of a Straw Man!

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

I posted the argument that refuted your straw leach... 'The Natural Laws of Mathematics are archaic constructs of a dogmatic, patriarchal culture' (It's an argument made of straw, that doesn't rise to the level worthy of being equated to the mammal, let alone humanity.)

The straw elements were where you applied a simple, but valid equation, then summarily declared the finding of that equation to be subject to one's own opinion; professing that drivel to not only be a fact... LOL! But to be the consequence of FUCKING GENIUS!

Which, of course, you used as a means to deflect from the standing points of your opposition... AND, given that such doesn't actually exist in nature, it was therefore a figment of a fertile imagination... even tho', in fairness to you, it wasn't your imagination... .

Sadly, (for you) ya plagiarized it from people who are at least as stupid as you are, thus inevitably suffering the same consequences from their stupid straw-shit, as ya customarily do from your own stupid shit.

See how that works?

 

[Avatar4321]

False dichotomy. I choose Republic

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

LOL! That is ADORABLE!

Of course, in reality, thus in truth, the equation, 2+2=4 remains true and valid, anywhere, at any time, simultaneously, anywhere in the universe, within the paradigm of that which is otherwise known as 'reality'; which is to say the scope of space/time in which humanity exists.

What our in-house member of the Intellectually Less Fortunate is clumsily trying to convey, is an addled expression of thought which rejects the confinement of the laws of mathematical constructs.

Which is to say that they offer an equation, which established, through the construct of the equation, that for which the reader is to find, which in this case is two sets of the value 2, which are to simply be summed. Where one sums two sets of the value 2, the solution is always 4.

What dingus is needs to do is to secretly redefine the equation. Wherein it resets the value 2 and defines it as 1 Peach and One Apple. Therefore it can claim that 2+2=2 peaches and two apples.

Of course in so doing, it alters the equation without the knowledge of the individual answering it. In effect changing well established rules and simply pretending that the new rules are as valid as the the old rules. When in reality, the equation, in terms of values and operations are set ... altering the terms without presenting the new terms in a new equation: is INVALID.

Which is the lie that all 'alternative' math establish. The consequence of 2+2 can be expressed in many ways... 1+1+1+1, 2+1+1, -1+5, 1,000,000 - 999,996 and so on.

But in No WAY does that mean that 2+2, sometimes equals something other than 4.

What it should have offered is how the idiocy it is selling was originally advanced in the 1970s when I was first introduced to it: "2 and 2 doesn't always add up to four!".

But to do that risks that the reader will be tipped off to the trick... which again that it is redefining the terms presented by implication in the verbal exchange, which is being withheld from the individual.

It's no less pitiful than making up your own language and laughing at people who can't understand what you claim to be 'saying'. Which you've no doubt recognized in other areas of the Left, where they use words like 'liberal' to represent the antithesis of the advocacy of liberty... and "Gay" to represent the shameful behavior of the sexual deviant. It all serves the same purpose, which of course, is Deceit, FRAUDULENTLY advanced as a means to influence the Ignorant.

ROFL!

So pitiful...

This once again demonstrating the foolish nature of the Ideological Left... comprised entirely of children and fools.

This is a distraction and you are playing into it.

The straw man of 2+2 does not always = 4 is meaningless to the actual thread.

It does in context, and I suggest you not use "Straw Man" until you research its actual meaning.

Straw man was used correctly, as that is precisely the form that your deflection took.

Ignorant and dishonest ^^^; it's no wonder Rabbi(t) is your (only) fan.

Your logical fallacy is strawman

Now post the argument you want others to believe meets the definition of a Straw Man!

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

I posted the argument that refuted your straw leach... 'The Natural Laws of Mathematics are archaic constructs of a dogmatic, patriarchal culture' (It's an argument made of straw, that doesn't rise to the level worthy of being equated to the mammal, let alone humanity.)

The straw elements were where you applied a simple, but valid equation, then summarily declared the finding of that equation to be subject to one's own opinion; professing that drivel to not only be a fact... LOL! But to be the consequence of FUCKING GENIUS!

Which, of course, you used as a means to deflect from the standing points of your opposition... AND, given that such doesn't actually exist in nature, it was therefore a figment of a fertile imagination... even tho', in fairness to you, it wasn't your imagination... .

Sadly, (for you) ya plagiarized it from people who are at least as stupid as you are, thus inevitably suffering the same consequences from their stupid straw-shit, as ya customarily do from your own stupid shit.

See how that works?

^^ POSSIBLY, THE MOST PROFOUND RHETORICAL BEAT-DOWN IN USMB HISTORY. ^^

 

[Wry Catcher]

This is a distraction and you are playing into it.

The straw man of 2+2 does not always = 4 is meaningless to the actual thread.

It does in context, and I suggest you not use "Straw Man" until you research its actual meaning.

Straw man was used correctly, as that is precisely the form that your deflection took.

Ignorant and dishonest ^^^; it's no wonder Rabbi(t) is your (only) fan.

Your logical fallacy is strawman

Now post the argument you want others to believe meets the definition of a Straw Man!

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

I posted the argument that refuted your straw leach... 'The Natural Laws of Mathematics are archaic constructs of a dogmatic, patriarchal culture' (It's an argument made of straw, that doesn't rise to the level worthy of being equated to the mammal, let alone humanity.)

The straw elements were where you applied a simple, but valid equation, then summarily declared the finding of that equation to be subject to one's own opinion; professing that drivel to not only be a fact... LOL! But to be the consequence of FUCKING GENIUS!

Which, of course, you used as a means to deflect from the standing points of your opposition... AND, given that such doesn't actually exist in nature, it was therefore a figment of a fertile imagination... even tho', in fairness to you, it wasn't your imagination... .

Sadly, (for you) ya plagiarized it from people who are at least as stupid as you are, thus inevitably suffering the same consequences from their stupid straw-shit, as ya customarily do from your own stupid shit.

See how that works?

^^ POSSIBLY, THE MOST PROFOUND RHETORICAL BEAT-DOWN IN USMB HISTORY. ^^

I'm sorry, the party you have called is not interested in reading your enigmatic syntax, magniloquent expressions and more bloviating.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

It does in context, and I suggest you not use "Straw Man" until you research its actual meaning.

Straw man was used correctly, as that is precisely the form that your deflection took.

Ignorant and dishonest ^^^; it's no wonder Rabbi(t) is your (only) fan.

Your logical fallacy is strawman

Now post the argument you want others to believe meets the definition of a Straw Man!

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

I posted the argument that refuted your straw leach... 'The Natural Laws of Mathematics are archaic constructs of a dogmatic, patriarchal culture' (It's an argument made of straw, that doesn't rise to the level worthy of being equated to the mammal, let alone humanity.)

The straw elements were where you applied a simple, but valid equation, then summarily declared the finding of that equation to be subject to one's own opinion; professing that drivel to not only be a fact... LOL! But to be the consequence of FUCKING GENIUS!

Which, of course, you used as a means to deflect from the standing points of your opposition... AND, given that such doesn't actually exist in nature, it was therefore a figment of a fertile imagination... even tho', in fairness to you, it wasn't your imagination... .

Sadly, (for you) ya plagiarized it from people who are at least as stupid as you are, thus inevitably suffering the same consequences from their stupid straw-shit, as ya customarily do from your own stupid shit.

See how that works?

^^ POSSIBLY, THE MOST PROFOUND RHETORICAL BEAT-DOWN IN USMB HISTORY. ^^

I'm sorry, the party you have called is not interested in reading your enigmatic syntax, magniloquent expressions and more bloviating.

ROFL!

So you are saying that you can't digest refutation.

Which explains how you came to be your age and remain this foolish.

And your second concession to the same standing points, is duly noted and summarily accepted.

(Reader, as I've noted many times, what you're seeing in the would-be 'contributors' response, is an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder; OKA: delusion.
Such is the same disorder that also presents as sexual deviancy. The above demonstration however provides a glimpse into the danger to the culture that such represents.

The Contributor sought to advise you of that which was irrefutably false, as truth. And even after having such demonstrated in undeniable terms, it maintains that the fraudulence it perpetrated upon you, to be true.

Now... there are many terms that have described such over the ages... but none defines it more completely then 'Evil'.

The reason that evil defines this is that such represents a virulent species of reasoning; subjective dishonesty.

This one contributor, by itself... is harmless enough. One post on a message board, truly is no threat to anyone.

But the attitude which conveys palpable fraud, as a means to prop up and promote itself... will appeal to others and the fraudulence itself will be shared with others and the ignorance that such perpetrated will; if left unchecked, be represented as truth ... to others.

Thus it is injurious, reaping chaos, calamity and eventually catastrophe, where sufficient numbers of individuals are infected by it. And in that there is only evil.)

 

[FA_Q2]

The fact that GMU & Keys are so sure that 2 + 2 always = 4 is a prime example, and provides probative evidence, that both lack imagination, ... .

LOL! That is ADORABLE!

Of course, in reality, thus in truth, the equation, 2+2=4 remains true and valid, anywhere, at any time, simultaneously, anywhere in the universe, within the paradigm of that which is otherwise known as 'reality'; which is to say the scope of space/time in which humanity exists.

What our in-house member of the Intellectually Less Fortunate is clumsily trying to convey, is an addled expression of thought which rejects the confinement of the laws of mathematical constructs.

Which is to say that they offer an equation, which established, through the construct of the equation, that for which the reader is to find, which in this case is two sets of the value 2, which are to simply be summed. Where one sums two sets of the value 2, the solution is always 4.

What dingus is needs to do is to secretly redefine the equation. Wherein it resets the value 2 and defines it as 1 Peach and One Apple. Therefore it can claim that 2+2=2 peaches and two apples.

Of course in so doing, it alters the equation without the knowledge of the individual answering it. In effect changing well established rules and simply pretending that the new rules are as valid as the the old rules. When in reality, the equation, in terms of values and operations are set ... altering the terms without presenting the new terms in a new equation: is INVALID.

Which is the lie that all 'alternative' math establish. The consequence of 2+2 can be expressed in many ways... 1+1+1+1, 2+1+1, -1+5, 1,000,000 - 999,996 and so on.

But in No WAY does that mean that 2+2, sometimes equals something other than 4.

What it should have offered is how the idiocy it is selling was originally advanced in the 1970s when I was first introduced to it: "2 and 2 doesn't always add up to four!".

But to do that risks that the reader will be tipped off to the trick... which again that it is redefining the terms presented by implication in the verbal exchange, which is being withheld from the individual.

It's no less pitiful than making up your own language and laughing at people who can't understand what you claim to be 'saying'. Which you've no doubt recognized in other areas of the Left, where they use words like 'liberal' to represent the antithesis of the advocacy of liberty... and "Gay" to represent the shameful behavior of the sexual deviant. It all serves the same purpose, which of course, is Deceit, FRAUDULENTLY advanced as a means to influence the Ignorant.

ROFL!

So pitiful...

This once again demonstrating the foolish nature of the Ideological Left... comprised entirely of children and fools.

This is a distraction and you are playing into it.

The straw man of 2+2 does not always = 4 is meaningless to the actual thread.

It does in context, and I suggest you not use "Straw Man" until you research its actual meaning.

I would suggest you do the same considering that I used it correctly. I know that you will not take that advice though so here you are, continuing your deflection even further.

 

[Contumacious]

Plutocracy or Democracy? YOU will decide in Nov. 2016!


.

Actually the question should have been PLUTOCRACY OR "PARASITOCRACY"

Actually the question should have been PLUTOCRACY OR "PARASITOCRACY"


.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Plutocracy or Democracy? YOU will decide in Nov. 2016!


.

Actually the question should have been PLUTOCRACY OR "PARASITOCRACY"

Actually the question should have been PLUTOCRACY OR "PARASITOCRACY"


.

Same thing, the 1%*** feed off the rest the Middle Class and working poor,all the while putting biddable demagogues into office passing laws which benefit them and providing them greater income and profits.

***"Corporations are people too" and are included as members of the 1%.