Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
What is funny to me is the first images were hand read, by grid square, and given a percentage number of ice coverage. When this same method is done today there is statistically no change in ice coverage from 1979.
Only when we allow the computer and algorithms to take over do we get and ever dwindling amount of ice. A simple change in the algorithms parameters and whala it all comes back. When redundant averaging is allowed to run in perpetuity all programs using it will end in zero. As far as I can ascertain, this has never been addressed in the global averaging program for sea ice...
Only when we allow the computer and algorithms to take over do we get and ever dwindling amount of ice. A simple change in the algorithms parameters and whala it all comes back. When redundant averaging is allowed to run in perpetuity all programs using it will end in zero. As far as I can ascertain, this has never been addressed in the global averaging program for sea ice...