Not sure what that last bit means, but whether PC is all these things depends entirely on the person practicing it, and their views.I'm virulently against PC because it is intellectually dishonest, cowardly, authoritarian, and (worst of all) terribly counter-productive on an inter-generational scale.
Not to mention flying directly against the spirit (please note I wrote "spirit") of the First Amendment, which is my personal fave.
The spirit and literally intent of the First Amendment are the same - to prevent a sitting government (the king, or a democratically elected body) from arresting people who speak out against it. It's not to ensure that "everyone has a voice", or that anyone has to listen to you. If people don't like what you're saying it's their right, arguably their responsibility, to speak up in opposition. That's all PC is. You might not like what some of the 'opinion makers' are pushing as issues, but some you probably do - and that's how we work things out as a free society.
Out of curiosity, how would you propose to combat "PC"?
Last edited: