Politico Breaking: Jack Smith Lays Out His Case Against Trump In Vivid Detail.

[Delldude]

Partial list. I heard there are more than 75 witnesses.

Jehovah witnesses?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Suppose you are successful and Trump is removed.

Practice saying President Vance.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So are you pedo, I always return.

Mods? Amart is a sexually confused poster.

 

[Mac1958]

Jack Smith lays out his case against Trump in vivid detail​

I really doubt this is going to move the needle. The fact is, Donald Trump is essentially an island. He's not held to any standards whatsoever. Especially by those who claim to care about morality or the law or the Constitution.

The law may try to go after him, and that's one thing. But half the public either won't hear about this, won't bother to absorb it, or won't care.

I couldn't tell you why, but that's a fact.

 

[excalibur]

Then he said, MAKE THEM RIOT....

Trump never said that. I challenge you to post where Trump himself said that in the released filing.

 

[eagle1462010]

I really doubt this is going to move the needle. The fact is, Donald Trump is essentially an island. He's not held to any standards whatsoever. Especially by those who claim to care about morality or the law or the Constitution.

The law may try to go after him, and that's one thing. But half the public either won't hear about this, won't bother to absorb it, or won't care.

I couldn't tell you why, but that's a fact.

I chose won't care.

After 8 years of BS we no longer listen to this politically motivated crap.

Politico opinion piece saying he said she said.

So Trump believes they use voting machines that can be tampered with....WELL that happened in Venezuala...imagine that.

Anyhow...I agree. What crime is stating my opinion. Crime of Butthurt Assault on Whining Leftist??

 

[SweetSue92]

no one believes this anymore, and no one cares.

Leftists, welcome to the consequences of your own panic

 

[john doe 101]

All the quotes and comments from within the report come from repubs, trump cabinet members, and staff of Donald Trump.

 

[john doe 101]

no one believes this anymore, and no one cares.

Leftists, welcome to the consequences of your own panic

Pretty sure sane America will care about it.

 

[john doe 101]

Your support and twisting to EXCUSE this lawfare is both laughable, and sad.

Dispute anything said by REPUBLICANS in the report, traitor.

 

[john doe 101]

4 weeks before the election and this bullshit is released !absolute proof the prosecution of Trump is political in nature ! lawfare to effect an election !

Could have been released a long time ago if trump wouldnt have delayed it.

 

[excalibur]

All the quotes and comments from within the report come from repubs, trump cabinet members, and staff of Donald Trump.

Alleged quotes from grand jury testimony, which allows no cross-examination. So very one-sided.

Which is why this sort of thing is not normally released, not unless needed at a trial.

 

[john doe 101]

Alleged quotes from grand jury testimony, which allows no cross-examination. So very one-sided.

Which is why this sort of thing is not normally released, not unless needed at a trial.

So you're saying all these quotes are false?

 

[excalibur]

So you're saying all these quotes are false?

Not what I said at all.

What I said is they are one-sided and have never been put to any cross-examination

Let alone a judicial ruling on admissibility, etc.

 

[Care4all]

Not what I said at all.

What I said is they are one-sided and have never been put to any cross-examination

Let alone a judicial ruling on admissibility, etc.

Thus the reason trump fought to keep the trial from happening... He'd lose his ability to say their testimony is one sided...they would be cross examined in a trial, verifying what they said happened was the truth.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Happy October Surprise!

You pitiful losers better hope it’s the only one. But, now you have to hear about it day

After day..After day..After day..After day

For the rest of the month.

Have Fun!

 

[forkup]

How is it possible for a judge to release evidence to the media before a freaking trial? Is it crazy time when another judge put a gag order on Trump so he couldn't defend himself in the media?

It's possible because SCOTUS decided that in order to prosecute a (former) president, a judge needs to decide before a trial wether or not evidence is admissable under an exceedingly vague, and completely unprecedented test for immunity.

A decision that was a result of Trump's assertion that a president is immune for criminal behavior.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Election interference from judge Chaka.

 

[Mac1958]

No good in this for the Orange crime boss

I haven't heard anything about this report that will make a difference. It seems pretty clear that, in the eyes of much of this country, ordinary rules & laws don't apply to him. He's the movie villain that people love.

He's The Joker from Batman.

Celebrity and showbiz. That's what America cares about.

 

[forkup]

Election interference from judge Chaka.

Sure, because nothing protects the integrity of the election more than keeping the specifics behind criminal charges of one of the candidates hidden from the public.

Specifics by the way, that only need to be given, because that candidate tried, and partially got immunity from criminal behavior from SCOTUS.