Poll: Will the recounts be worth the effort?

Will the recount efforts change the outcome of the election?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 4.3%
  • No

    Votes: 59 84.3%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 8 11.4%

  • Total voters
    70

Billy000

Democratic Socialist
Nov 10, 2011
32,030
12,797
1,560
Colorado
I suppose the results of this poll are predictable. All the conservatives will of course say "no" because that kind of narrow-mindedness is expected from them and all the liberals will say vote either "yes" or "maybe".

I'm in the "maybe" camp. I wouldn't be surprised by the results either way. I am encouraged that independent experts believe fraud had occurred. If they were worth the effort, Jill Stein would become my hero. If they turn up with no significant change, it will be an embarrassment for both her and Hillary because Hillary has just announced she supports the recount. I suppose she doesn't have anything to lose.
 
Hillary just divested herself of the last shred of dignity she had by supporting the recount. So go ahead recount WI like I posted last night. If there is no change in the results, then it is over since MI and PA don't have enough Electoral votes to get her to 270.
 
Depends upon what you believe the desired outcome of the effort is.

In any case, Stein is such an obvious prop player that only the totally blind hack can't see it.
What else do you people have to do? Maybe it will keep you from murdering electors who refuse to break their pledge and vote for Hillary.
 
The liberal intellectual basis for a recount is to verify if Russia adulterated the election.

That is much more of an FBI issue than a recounting issue.

A plain recount won't accomplish anything at all.

The results need to be audited by the FBI to find out if Russia messed things up in favor of Trump.

Right now the far left is crying "this can't be so it must be Russia's fault!"

Needless whining.

Trump is the lesser of two weevils.

At least Trump believes in the US Constitution including all the amendments.

Hillary does not.

Nancy Pelosi does not.

Diane Feinstein does not.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg does not.
 
What else do you people have to do? Maybe it will keep you from murdering electors who refuse to break their pledge and vote for Hillary.
"You people"?

WTF are you talking about?
Perhaps you heard there was a recent election, so "you people" refers to the Clinton supporters who are sending death threats to electors who won't break their pledge and vote for Clinton and who are now calling for a recount.
 
I think if Hil-liar is going to play this game, Trump should reverse his position on hiring an outside council to look into Hillary's email scandal
 
I can't vote. There is not option for:

Lol you stupid gullible fools are grasping at straws!
You're right. Any means necessary must be taken to remove Trump. Hell all of this wouldn't even be happening if ANY other republican had won the election. Putin and ISIS see Trump as a pawn and they're right. That's dangerous for America.
 
I suppose the results of this poll are predictable. All the conservatives will of course say "no" because that kind of narrow-mindedness is expected from them and all the liberals will say vote either "yes" or "maybe".

I'm in the "maybe" camp. I wouldn't be surprised by the results either way. I am encouraged that independent experts believe fraud had occurred. If they were worth the effort, Jill Stein would become my hero. If they turn up with no significant change, it will be an embarrassment for both her and Hillary because Hillary has just announced she supports the recount. I suppose she doesn't have anything to lose.
The result will be the same, so how are they "worth it?"
 
I suppose the results of this poll are predictable. All the conservatives will of course say "no" because that kind of narrow-mindedness is expected from them and all the liberals will say vote either "yes" or "maybe".

I'm in the "maybe" camp. I wouldn't be surprised by the results either way. I am encouraged that independent experts believe fraud had occurred. If they were worth the effort, Jill Stein would become my hero. If they turn up with no significant change, it will be an embarrassment for both her and Hillary because Hillary has just announced she supports the recount. I suppose she doesn't have anything to lose.
nobody criticized Trump more than your boy hillary for not accepting election results.
And here we are once again, democrats being what they criticize most.
 
The liberal intellectual basis for a recount is to verify if Russia adulterated the election.

That is much more of an FBI issue than a recounting issue.

A plain recount won't accomplish anything at all.

The results need to be audited by the FBI to find out if Russia messed things up in favor of Trump.

Right now the far left is crying "this can't be so it must be Russia's fault!"

Needless whining.

Trump is the lesser of two weevils.

At least Trump believes in the US Constitution including all the amendments.

Hillary does not.

Nancy Pelosi does not.

Diane Feinstein does not.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg does not.
Cyber security experts believe a recount is the best option to reveal any fraud. That's the only way the FBI could even open an investigation.
 
I can't vote. There is not option for:

Lol you stupid gullible fools are grasping at straws!
You're right. Any means necessary must be taken to remove Trump. Hell all of this wouldn't even be happening if ANY other republican had won the election. Putin and ISIS see Trump as a pawn and they're right. That's dangerous for America.
:crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby::crybaby:
 
The liberal intellectual basis for a recount is to verify if Russia adulterated the election.

That is much more of an FBI issue than a recounting issue.

A plain recount won't accomplish anything at all.

The results need to be audited by the FBI to find out if Russia messed things up in favor of Trump.

Right now the far left is crying "this can't be so it must be Russia's fault!"

Needless whining.

Trump is the lesser of two weevils.

At least Trump believes in the US Constitution including all the amendments.

Hillary does not.

Nancy Pelosi does not.

Diane Feinstein does not.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg does not.
Cyber security experts believe a recount is the best option to reveal any fraud. That's the only way the FBI could even open an investigation.
You mean some Democrat hacks claim it's the best way. There won't be any investigation.
 
I suppose the results of this poll are predictable. All the conservatives will of course say "no" because that kind of narrow-mindedness is expected from them and all the liberals will say vote either "yes" or "maybe".

I'm in the "maybe" camp. I wouldn't be surprised by the results either way. I am encouraged that independent experts believe fraud had occurred. If they were worth the effort, Jill Stein would become my hero. If they turn up with no significant change, it will be an embarrassment for both her and Hillary because Hillary has just announced she supports the recount. I suppose she doesn't have anything to lose.
The result will be the same, so how are they "worth it?"
 
The liberal intellectual basis for a recount is to verify if Russia adulterated the election.

That is much more of an FBI issue than a recounting issue.

A plain recount won't accomplish anything at all.

The results need to be audited by the FBI to find out if Russia messed things up in favor of Trump.

Right now the far left is crying "this can't be so it must be Russia's fault!"

Needless whining.

Trump is the lesser of two weevils.

At least Trump believes in the US Constitution including all the amendments.

Hillary does not.

Nancy Pelosi does not.

Diane Feinstein does not.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg does not.
Cyber security experts believe a recount is the best option to reveal any fraud. That's the only way the FBI could even open an investigation.

The only way they could open an investigation if there was some evidence that wrongdoing took place. But there is no such evidence--not even a hint of evidence. It's just that you snowflakes can't take a loss.
 
If destroying ANY chance of our nation ever coming together as one is the goal the yes the recount may yield results.

God you people are so stupid. We survived Carter & Bush & Obama so what the literal fuck is the problem?
 
Perhaps you heard there was a recent election, so "you people" refers to the Clinton supporters who are sending death threats to electors who won't break their pledge and vote for Clinton and who are now calling for a recount.
Well, you quoted my post. I'm not one of "you people", Chumley.
 

Forum List

Back
Top