Poll: Will the recounts be worth the effort?

[Care4all]

It'll put people's minds at ease...we won't go through another 20 years of conspiracy theories on whether the Russians hacked us or not....

Gee, I wonder where all those tin hat theories cam from?

So what is your theory....?

Do you think all of these intelligence agencies that believe it shows Russian markings in the hacks are lying?

Do you believe our FBI did it and gave the hacked material to Julian Assange, and are framing the Russians?

OR Do you believe the Trump campaign hacked the DNC, Podesta, and the Hillary Campaign and gave it to Assange?

Or did the RNC do it?

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

Computer science experts recommend Hillary Clinton challenge election results in 3 swing states

They are being fronted by election lawyers not tied to Hillary as well. How do we know? Because Hillary initially refused to support a recount.

"While they do not have definitive proof of manipulation or hacking..."

Stopped reading right there. Two "experts" who have no proof whatsoever.

Now, Stein has raised more money at a faster rate than her entire presidential campaign did.

Naaw, couldn't be a total back room job from the left, to cast doubt onto the legitimacy of the election! They're so above that!

 

[PredFan]

Maybe. It's an opportunity for the Dems to cheat and change the numbers.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

If destroying ANY chance of our nation ever coming together as one is the goal the yes the recount may yield results.

God you people are so stupid. We survived Carter & Bush & Obama so what the literal fuck is the problem?

even with a death from a thousand cuts, the victim survived the first 800 cuts. So what is the problem with going after the next 200.
Another 4 years of the BS policies and destructive actions that we have endured for the last 24 years would most likely be enough to bring this country to an end.
Its over, the liberal experiment was given a good chance but it failed. We need to get back on course now and start building the country in order to return it to the safe and prosperous place it once was.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

So what is your theory....?

Do you think all of these intelligence agencies that believe it shows Russian markings in the hacks are lying?

Do you believe our FBI did it and gave the hacked material to Julian Assange, and are framing the Russians?

OR Do you believe the Trump campaign hacked the DNC, Podesta, and the Hillary Campaign?

Or did the RNC do it?

There is no evidence at all -ZERO- that the election was hacked, by the Russians or anyone else. The "experts" cited have even admitted as much.

But that's not going to stop the tin hatters.

 

[boedicca]

In response to the OP: It all depends on how you define "worth it".

If it means changing the tally so that hiLIARy becomes President, then no.

If it means promoting a climate of divisiveness and rubbing salt into the Epic Prog Butthurt so that they continue their rampages of outrage, then it will be "worth it" in the short term.

In the long term, it will just further horrify decent people and drive them away from the Dems.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

And what is their evidence. they've told us literally nothing more than what people have always known, that it's possible to hack electronic systems.

And the libs hoist it like it's the Ark of the covenant. what a fucking joke.

The libs should be embarrassed, not that that is actually possible after their reaction to this election, where they've openly sold out any shred of dignity they might have once had.

I read the later linked piece form the magazine The Weak.

The two "experts" cited have admitted that they have no evidence. But lack of evidence never stopped subversives who need to be chucked form helicopters.

 

[bripat9643]

And let's not pretend for one fucking second had the election gone the other way, the demand for a recount and legal challenges wouldn't have been a lot more aggressive.

You mean like in '08 and '12?

Oh, wait.

Republicans who were both qualified candidates ran in those years. Men with integrity.

We've crossed over into Demagogue-fringe-hellscape America.

By "qualified" you mean they were douche bags with no principles who were happy to sell out their constituents. By "demagogue" you mean any politician who promises to do what his supporters want him to do.

 

[bripat9643]

Cyber security experts believe a recount is the best option to reveal any fraud. That's the only way the FBI could even open an investigation.

Which cyber security experts?. Start naming them, what makes them expert, and what are their political ties?

Computer science experts recommend Hillary Clinton challenge election results in 3 swing states

They are being fronted by election lawyers not tied to Hillary as well. How do we know? Because Hillary initially refused to support a recount.

Was that her "public position" or her "private position?"

 

[bripat9643]

So what is your theory....?

Do you think all of these intelligence agencies that believe it shows Russian markings in the hacks are lying?

Do you believe our FBI did it and gave the hacked material to Julian Assange, and are framing the Russians?

OR Do you believe the Trump campaign hacked the DNC, Podesta, and the Hillary Campaign?

Or did the RNC do it?

There is no evidence at all -ZERO- that the election was hacked, by the Russians or anyone else. The "experts" cited have even admitted as much.

But that's not going to stop the tin hatters.

Voting machines can't be hacked because they aren't connected to the internet.

 

[peach174]

I found it interesting that Jill Stein who is leading this, said that any donation money left over from the lawyers fees would be put in the green partys coffers, rather than giving it back to the people.
How many people who donated for a recall are for the green party?

 

[Billy000]

Computer science experts recommend Hillary Clinton challenge election results in 3 swing states

They are being fronted by election lawyers not tied to Hillary as well. How do we know? Because Hillary initially refused to support a recount.

"While they do not have definitive proof of manipulation or hacking..."

Stopped reading right there. Two "experts" who have no proof whatsoever.

Now, Stein has raised more money at a faster rate than her entire presidential campaign did.

Naaw, couldn't be a total back room job from the left, to cast doubt onto the legitimacy of the election! They're so above that!

It's not like you have an informed opinion on the subject. They do. Look, I realize the whole
Thing could be a waste of time, but if the results are suspicious and the money was raised, why not try? You should be happy about it frankly. If you're so convinced it's a waste of time, Hillary will make a complete ass of herself.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

Also interesting to note that they're only interested in threes states: WI, MI & PA.

But in Minnesota, where the margin was even slimmer than in those three states, they're good with the result.

 

[Care4all]

So what is your theory....?

Do you think all of these intelligence agencies that believe it shows Russian markings in the hacks are lying?

Do you believe our FBI did it and gave the hacked material to Julian Assange, and are framing the Russians?

OR Do you believe the Trump campaign hacked the DNC, Podesta, and the Hillary Campaign?

Or did the RNC do it?

There is no evidence at all -ZERO- that the election was hacked, by the Russians or anyone else. The "experts" cited have even admitted as much.

But that's not going to stop the tin hatters.

Ahhh, so your tinfoil hat comment was not about the WHOLE PICTURE and simply about one small part of it?

there's enough doubt from all else that had happened with the Russians trying to influence first the primary with their strategic leaks and then the election with their specific time released leaks, along with hacking a couple of states voter registration system, along with making the attempts to hack in to 20 different State voter registration system....

then, you got these no paper trail electronic voting districts having Hillary receive 7% less votes than ALL OTHER voting districts using machines with a paper trails and it appears suspicious....even IF IT IS NOT and can otherwise be explained....

So to me, instead of having go through the next 20 years with one conspiracy theory after another, and bloggers making a career out of it, touting the election was hacked, it's well worth an audit/recount, if they examine the electronic voting machines....

 

[Fueri]

And what is their evidence. they've told us literally nothing more than what people have always known, that it's possible to hack electronic systems.

And the libs hoist it like it's the Ark of the covenant. what a fucking joke.

The libs should be embarrassed, not that that is actually possible after their reaction to this election, where they've openly sold out any shred of dignity they might have once had.

I read the later linked piece form the magazine The Weak.

The two "experts" cited have admitted that they have no evidence. But lack of evidence never stopped subversives who need to be chucked form helicopters.

Nate Silver has also already refuted the anamoly they cited.

No evidence or basis whatsoever. literally none.

Pathetic display by the Cryin' Left.....

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

It's not like you have an informed opinion on the subject. They do. Look, I realize the whole
Thing could be a waste of time, but if the results are suspicious and the money was raised, why not try? You should be happy about it frankly. If you're so convinced it's a waste of time, Hillary will make a complete ass of herself.

I'm informed that it's two -TWO- supposed experts, that the money for this effort was raised at a far faster rate than the campaign funds for the woman calling for the recount were, and that there's going to be no recount in MN, where the margin of victory was closer than in the three states being recounted.

Like I said, only a blind partisan hack can't see that this is a total sham.

 

[Billy000]

It's not like you have an informed opinion on the subject. They do. Look, I realize the whole
Thing could be a waste of time, but if the results are suspicious and the money was raised, why not try? You should be happy about it frankly. If you're so convinced it's a waste of time, Hillary will make a complete ass of herself.

I'm informed that it's two -TWO- supposed experts, that the money for this effort was raised at a far faster rate than the campaign funds for the woman calling for the recount were, and that there's going to be no recount in MN, where the margin of victory was closer than in the three states being recounted.

Like I said, only a blind partisan hack can't see that this is a total sham.

Oh please you just believe what you want to believe. Hillary didn't raise a dime for this recount. She initially rejected having a recount when those experts approached her.

 

[Avatar4321]

I can't vote. There is not option for:

Lol you stupid gullible fools are grasping at straws!

You're right. Any means necessary must be taken to remove Trump. Hell all of this wouldn't even be happening if ANY other republican had won the election. Putin and ISIS see Trump as a pawn and they're right. That's dangerous for America.

Uh no. We don't need to use any means necessary to remove trump. He will.be out of office in four or eight years unless old age gets him first.

Regardless he is president. No recount is going to change that. We will survive. We just survived worse

 

[Avatar4321]

It'll put people's minds at ease...we won't go through another 20 years of conspiracy theories on whether the Russians hacked us or not....

Funny recounts didn't stop the conspiracy theories that bush stole 2000. And the same results occured every time

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

Oh please you just believe what you want to believe. Hillary didn't raise a dime for this recount. She initially rejected having a recount when those experts approached her.

Like I said, evident to all but the most blind.