Poll: Will the recounts be worth the effort?

[Avatar4321]

The liberal intellectual basis for a recount is to verify if Russia adulterated the election.

That is much more of an FBI issue than a recounting issue.

A plain recount won't accomplish anything at all.

The results need to be audited by the FBI to find out if Russia messed things up in favor of Trump.

Right now the far left is crying "this can't be so it must be Russia's fault!"

Needless whining.

Trump is the lesser of two weevils.

At least Trump believes in the US Constitution including all the amendments.

Hillary does not.

Nancy Pelosi does not.

Diane Feinstein does not.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg does not.

Cyber security experts believe a recount is the best option to reveal any fraud. That's the only way the FBI could even open an investigation.

The only way they could open an investigation if there was some evidence that wrongdoing took place. But there is no such evidence--not even a hint of evidence. It's just that you snowflakes can't take a loss.

Yes there is. Cyber security experts believe fraud has been committed.

Then name one. Quote what he said

 

[bripat9643]

Computer science experts recommend Hillary Clinton challenge election results in 3 swing states

They are being fronted by election lawyers not tied to Hillary as well. How do we know? Because Hillary initially refused to support a recount.

"While they do not have definitive proof of manipulation or hacking..."

Stopped reading right there. Two "experts" who have no proof whatsoever.

Now, Stein has raised more money at a faster rate than her entire presidential campaign did.

Naaw, couldn't be a total back room job from the left, to cast doubt onto the legitimacy of the election! They're so above that!

It's not like you have an informed opinion on the subject. They do. Look, I realize the whole
Thing could be a waste of time, but if the results are suspicious and the money was raised, why not try? You should be happy about it frankly. If you're so convinced it's a waste of time, Hillary will make a complete ass of herself.

Everyone should be concerned whenever Dims are "counting votes." "Counting" is just a euphemism the use for "manufacturing" votes. Whenever they "count" votes, new Democrat votes miraculously appear from nowhere: the trunk of someone's car, boxes left in a polling location, etc..

 

[LaDexter]

Yes, because like FLA 2000, it will out the DEMS as the REAL CHEATERS.

 

[Avatar4321]

And let's not pretend for one fucking second had the election gone the other way, the demand for a recount and legal challenges wouldn't have been a lot more aggressive.

You mean like in '08 and '12?

Oh, wait.

Republicans who were both qualified candidates ran in those years. Men with integrity.

We've crossed over into Demagogue-fringe-hellscape America.

The democrats didn't

 

[jon_berzerk]

Hillary just divested herself of the last shred of dignity she had by supporting the recount. So go ahead recount WI like I posted last night. If there is no change in the results, then it is over since MI and PA don't have enough Electoral votes to get her to 270.

i see the recount as more proof of a reason why trump should be president

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Just goes to show the astounding hypocrisy of the left and even some on the right as well.

Media: MR. Trump, will you accept the results of the election?

Liberal public: He won't because he's a whiner.


Results? You tell me....

 

[bripat9643]

It's not like you have an informed opinion on the subject. They do. Look, I realize the whole
Thing could be a waste of time, but if the results are suspicious and the money was raised, why not try? You should be happy about it frankly. If you're so convinced it's a waste of time, Hillary will make a complete ass of herself.

I'm informed that it's two -TWO- supposed experts, that the money for this effort was raised at a far faster rate than the campaign funds for the woman calling for the recount were, and that there's going to be no recount in MN, where the margin of victory was closer than in the three states being recounted.

Like I said, only a blind partisan hack can't see that this is a total sham.

Oh please you just believe what you want to believe. Hillary didn't raise a dime for this recount. She initially rejected having a recount when those experts approached her.

Clintons Confirm Participation In Recount Plan, Despite No "Actionable Evidence Of Hacking"

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

Clintons Confirm Participation In Recount Plan, Despite No "Actionable Evidence Of Hacking"

 

[Bush92]

I suppose the results of this poll are predictable. All the conservatives will of course say "no" because that kind of narrow-mindedness is expected from them and all the liberals will say vote either "yes" or "maybe".

I'm in the "maybe" camp. I wouldn't be surprised by the results either way. I am encouraged that independent experts believe fraud had occurred. If they were worth the effort, Jill Stein would become my hero. If they turn up with no significant change, it will be an embarrassment for both her and Hillary because Hillary has just announced she supports the recount. I suppose she doesn't have anything to lose.

Recount is a complete waste of time, and a effort by Democratic Socialist Prty to steal an election.

 

[Care4all]

It'll put people's minds at ease...we won't go through another 20 years of conspiracy theories on whether the Russians hacked us or not....

Funny recounts didn't stop the conspiracy theories that bush stole 2000. And the same results occured every time

people believed the Supreme Court handed the election, to George w Bush.

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

7 Reasons Jill Stein's Recount Is A Scam

Even renowned democrat water boy Nate Slver can see through this farce.

Nate Silver on Twitter

 

[LaDexter]

people believed the Supreme Court handed the election, to George w Bush.

And then those same "people" in the "US" media did a recount, and not only did W win, he GAINED VOTES... proving the DEMS CHEATED...

USATODAY.com - Newspapers' recount shows Bush prevailed

" Bush would have won by 1,665 votes — more than triple his official 537-vote margin — if every dimple, hanging chad and mark on the ballots had been counted as votes,"



and that is the fun part about RECOUNTS - they always out the DEMS for the CHEATERS they are!!!

 

[Billy000]

Computer science experts recommend Hillary Clinton challenge election results in 3 swing states

They are being fronted by election lawyers not tied to Hillary as well. How do we know? Because Hillary initially refused to support a recount.

"While they do not have definitive proof of manipulation or hacking..."

Stopped reading right there. Two "experts" who have no proof whatsoever.

Now, Stein has raised more money at a faster rate than her entire presidential campaign did.

Naaw, couldn't be a total back room job from the left, to cast doubt onto the legitimacy of the election! They're so above that!

It's not like you have an informed opinion on the subject. They do. Look, I realize the whole
Thing could be a waste of time, but if the results are suspicious and the money was raised, why not try? You should be happy about it frankly. If you're so convinced it's a waste of time, Hillary will make a complete ass of herself.

Everyone should be concerned whenever Dims are "counting votes." "Counting" is just a euphemism the use for "manufacturing" votes. Whenever they "count" votes, new Democrat votes miraculously appear from nowhere: the trunk of someone's car, boxes left in a polling location, etc..

You just make shit up as you go along. If dems "manufacture" votes, then why did they even lose the election to begin with?

 

[miketx]

So, they are recounting the recount! You go H.C. Criminal skank.

 

[GWV5903]

You can't make this stuff up...



Do they think for one second the decision will be reversed?

 

[Rexx Taylor]

what is she up to? and is she gonna keep the money? typical democrat. wont work for a living

 

[Wyatt earp]

Computer science experts recommend Hillary Clinton challenge election results in 3 swing states

They are being fronted by election lawyers not tied to Hillary as well. How do we know? Because Hillary initially refused to support a recount.

"While they do not have definitive proof of manipulation or hacking..."

Stopped reading right there. Two "experts" who have no proof whatsoever.

Now, Stein has raised more money at a faster rate than her entire presidential campaign did.

Naaw, couldn't be a total back room job from the left, to cast doubt onto the legitimacy of the election! They're so above that!

It's not like you have an informed opinion on the subject. They do. Look, I realize the whole
Thing could be a waste of time, but if the results are suspicious and the money was raised, why not try? You should be happy about it frankly. If you're so convinced it's a waste of time, Hillary will make a complete ass of herself.

Everyone should be concerned whenever Dims are "counting votes." "Counting" is just a euphemism the use for "manufacturing" votes. Whenever they "count" votes, new Democrat votes miraculously appear from nowhere: the trunk of someone's car, boxes left in a polling location, etc..

You just make shit up as you go along. If dems "manufacture" votes, then why did they even lose the election to begin with?

Prove him wrong

 

[miketx]

Is the phrase "liberal moron" too easy?

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

Is the phrase "liberal moron" too easy?

Redundant.