Pompeo verbally assaulted an NPR reporter.

There was no ambush. The topics were cleared with Pompeo's staff (with email chain to support it). Can you stop lying?

Try to calm down.

The Dems and their corrupt lawless party will be utterly destroyed. :eusa_hand:

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.
Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.
The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws

Prove it. Post the law.

and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers

What will absolute anonymity do for false charges against political figures?

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues

The issue was Trump's phone call. The Bidens weren't the issue of the call?

Schiff already said the whistleblower should be called as a witness, multiple times, on camera during fake news interviews.
 
I think you trumpers need a reality check. You guys are all in here running your mouths off about a certain and guaranteed trump landslide re election in November.

Let's take a look at your candidate.

He's been impeached. Now this means he starts off bad no matter what you in the 30 percent cult believe. trump is about to get pounded this fall by a relentless media campaign that is going to use his obstruction in this and the Mueller cases against him. And that will just be one part of trumps woes. That hunter biden shit isn't going to fool the majority of Americans. Calling Warren pocahontas for 3 months will not get him re elected. Joe Biden will rip him to shreds on both domestic and foreign policy. He will gut trump when it comes to his claims about the economy. trump is cutting food stamps and trying to cut social security, these things are going to be unleashed on trump and spelling covfefe on twitter is all he'll be left to do. trump is going to get carved up this fall.
 
The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.
No, whistleblowers can and do testify, Coyote. The reason why the dems don't want him to testify is that it would expose the shenanigans with Schiff.
Not to mention that he wouldn't qualify as a whistleblower in the first place.
The issue of Biden? This is the crux of the impeachment proceedings, yes...Jr. is
very relevant. What are the democrats hiding regarding the Bidens?
Meister, there is no issue with Biden. Trump approved money to Ukraine in 2017-18. What you believe is a lie, so please stop lying.
If there is no issue with Biden, we should have him as a witness, along with the whistleblower.


Along with Bolton, Mulvaney, and Pompeo....you ready for that Wild Ride?
Absolutely, and throw Schiff in there too. The democrats don't want any of that 1 witness for 1 witness, why is that? What are they hiding?
Nadler already said he would vote against that scenario and not have any witnesses. Why is that, what are they hiding?


Why would Democrats care?? It'll be a short testify...."Congressman Schiff, do you have any knowledge of the transaction of the phone call that occurred on July 25, 2019 where President Donald John Trump solicited the president of Ukraine to "but can you do us a favor"? No??...(crickets chirping)..in his attempt to leverage foreign aid to coerce Ukraine to dig up any dirt they may have on his greatest political rival.

Move along...as Officer Barbrady says..."Nothing to See Here".
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
There was no ambush. The topics were cleared with Pompeo's staff (with email chain to support it). Can you stop lying?

Try to calm down.

The Dems and their corrupt lawless party will be utterly destroyed. :eusa_hand:

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.
Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

LMAO the Biden's corruption is at the center of impeachment and the Biden's should not be called as witnesses? You are also forgetting Schiff said the whistleblower should be called as a witness.
There was no Biden corruption. Fox news is feeding your dumb ass a bunch of bullshit. Schiff said what he did before 11-12 witnesses said the same thing as the whistleblower.
 
The FACT is Dem's were caught lying, colluding, and scheming. Naturally they don't want any witnesses to this testifying under oath in public.
 
No, whistleblowers can and do testify, Coyote. The reason why the dems don't want him to testify is that it would expose the shenanigans with Schiff.
Not to mention that he wouldn't qualify as a whistleblower in the first place.
The issue of Biden? This is the crux of the impeachment proceedings, yes...Jr. is
very relevant. What are the democrats hiding regarding the Bidens?
Meister, there is no issue with Biden. Trump approved money to Ukraine in 2017-18. What you believe is a lie, so please stop lying.
If there is no issue with Biden, we should have him as a witness, along with the whistleblower.


Along with Bolton, Mulvaney, and Pompeo....you ready for that Wild Ride?
Absolutely, and throw Schiff in there too. The democrats don't want any of that 1 witness for 1 witness, why is that? What are they hiding?
Nadler already said he would vote against that scenario and not have any witnesses. Why is that, what are they hiding?


Why would Democrats care?? It'll be a short testify...."Congressman Schiff, do you have any knowledge of the transaction of the phone call that occurred on July 25, 2019 where President Donald John Trump solicited the president of Ukraine to "but can you do us a favor"? No??...(crickets chirping)..in his attempt to leverage foreign aid to coerce Ukraine to dig up any dirt they may have on his greatest political rival.

Move along...as Officer Barbrady says..."Nothing to See Here".
You're forgetting about the shenanigans between the whistleblower and Schiff. But, you already knew that.
You make a good minion for your master, I will say that.
 
The Dems and their corrupt lawless party will be utterly destroyed. :eusa_hand:

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.
Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

LMAO the Biden's corruption is at the center of impeachment and the Biden's should not be called as witnesses? You are also forgetting Schiff said the whistleblower should be called as a witness.
There was no Biden corruption. Fox news is feeding your dumb ass a bunch of bullshit. Schiff said what he did before 11-12 witnesses said the same thing as the whistleblower.

Lib please government officials PLURAL in Obama's own administration voiced concerns over this. :eusa_hand:
 
The Dems and their corrupt lawless party will be utterly destroyed. :eusa_hand:

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.
Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

LMAO the Biden's corruption is at the center of impeachment and the Biden's should not be called as witnesses? You are also forgetting Schiff said the whistleblower should be called as a witness.
There was no Biden corruption. Fox news is feeding your dumb ass a bunch of bullshit. Schiff said what he did before 11-12 witnesses said the same thing as the whistleblower.
Schiff said so, so I guess you're right. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Yeah, important stuff like lying to the media.
Lying to liars dont count

Lying to the American people, counts. And the media is constitutionally mandated to keep the public informed about the President’s activities.

I get that Trumpkins HATE that the media keeps calling out Trump’s self-serving, and highly illegal behaviours, but his illegal self-serving behaviours is why he was unfit for office in the first place.
Pompao did not lie to the lib reporter

he just told her to pound sand

He clearly lied.
He was pissed off because he couldn't answer the questions.

Audio at the link.

Pompeo explodes at NPR reporter, asks if she could find Ukraine on a map
"Verbally Assaulted"?

Is that something like "hurting a snowflakes feelings"?

Or maybe "not taking someone's bullshit"?

View attachment 302364
No Son. That's what I do to you guys every day.

A verbal assault is different.

She sandbagged him, lied to get him on her show. She lied that she was going to discuss Iran then jumped him over Marie Yovanovitch


No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?
Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

Multiple people - there is a email trail.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...93cf0e-4071-11ea-b503-2b077c436617_story.html
 
trump has been impeached by the democrats in congress.

Its not a real impeachment. Hell its not even a half impeachment Dem's couldn't even convince all the Dems to vote for impeachment let alone a single Republican. :itsok:
It is a real impeachment. All the democrats are not required to vote for impeachment. Republicans are covering this up with trump hoping to stay in power.
 
Lying to liars dont count

Lying to the American people, counts. And the media is constitutionally mandated to keep the public informed about the President’s activities.

I get that Trumpkins HATE that the media keeps calling out Trump’s self-serving, and highly illegal behaviours, but his illegal self-serving behaviours is why he was unfit for office in the first place.
Pompao did not lie to the lib reporter

he just told her to pound sand

He clearly lied.
"Verbally Assaulted"?

Is that something like "hurting a snowflakes feelings"?

Or maybe "not taking someone's bullshit"?

View attachment 302364
No Son. That's what I do to you guys every day.

A verbal assault is different.

She sandbagged him, lied to get him on her show. She lied that she was going to discuss Iran then jumped him over Marie Yovanovitch


No she did not. She cleared the topics with his staff - Iran and Ukraine, well ahead of the interview. That is typical best practices when interviewing high ranking officials. Can't you guys just stop lying for a change? Just once?
Who sez she cleared ukraine with his staff?

Multiple people including the CEO of NPR - there is a email trail.

Team Trump will just call it fake news
 
EPKhAcsUwAAds_S.jpg


It's a trick. Pompeo doesn't have a spine.
More spine than any pussy lib.
 
The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.
Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.

LMAO the Biden's corruption is at the center of impeachment and the Biden's should not be called as witnesses? You are also forgetting Schiff said the whistleblower should be called as a witness.
There was no Biden corruption. Fox news is feeding your dumb ass a bunch of bullshit. Schiff said what he did before 11-12 witnesses said the same thing as the whistleblower.
Schiff said so, so I guess you're right. :auiqs.jpg:

Yes I am right. You are dissing Schiff based on words from a man that has told over 16,000 documented lies.
 
The Dems and their corrupt lawless party will be utterly destroyed. :eusa_hand:

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.
Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.
The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws

Prove it. Post the law.

and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers

What will absolute anonymity do for false charges against political figures?

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues

The issue was Trump's phone call. The Bidens weren't the issue of the call?

Schiff already said the whistleblower should be called as a witness, multiple times, on camera during fake news interviews.

Doesn't matter what Schiff says. It violates the whistle blower protection law for intelligence agencies.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
trump has been impeached by the democrats in congress.

Its not a real impeachment. Hell its not even a half impeachment Dem's couldn't even convince all the Dems to vote for impeachment let alone a single Republican. :itsok:
It is a real impeachment. All the democrats are not required to vote for impeachment. Republicans are covering this up with trump hoping to stay in power.

Its a joke impeachment, my sore loser Dems with a pouty face. Again not even all Dems voted for impeachment, sorry you lose, again, MAGA!!
 
There was no ambush. The topics were cleared with Pompeo's staff (with email chain to support it). Can you stop lying?

Try to calm down.

The Dems and their corrupt lawless party will be utterly destroyed. :eusa_hand:

The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.
Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.
The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws

Prove it. Post the law.

and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers

What will absolute anonymity do for false charges against political figures?

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues

The issue was Trump's phone call. The Bidens weren't the issue of the call?

I've posted it before. Several times. Here it is yet again.

R45345.pdf
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
The republicans are the lawless party and I see 2018 coming again and more. If republicans don't allows witnesses in this senate trial, they are gone.

And trump will not be reelected.
Take the blinders off and you will see so much more, IM2.
The last thing that the dems want to see in the trial is a Hunter Biden or the whistleblower as witnesses.
Nadler even said if it came to that he would vote for no witnesses. What the hell are the democrats hiding?
Of course, you really don't want to know that either.

The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers from the intelligence agencies not to mention put lives at risk. Just isn't a good step to take when all he reported has been indecently verified and those people can take and have taken the witness stand. Except for a handful that were refused.

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues and possibly harassment. IF there evidence of wrong doing by the Bidens, by all means conduct an investigation - it needs it's own investigation. No one would argue against it if the evidence warrants it.
The whistle blower should not be a witness - it's a violation of whistle blower laws

Prove it. Post the law.

and it will put an absolute chill on whistle blowers

What will absolute anonymity do for false charges against political figures?

Biden shouldn't be called as a witness because that is a deflection away from the issues

The issue was Trump's phone call. The Bidens weren't the issue of the call?

Schiff already said the whistleblower should be called as a witness, multiple times, on camera during fake news interviews.

Doesn't matter what Schiff says. It violates the whistle blower protection law for intelligence agencies.

Legal scholars say you are wrong.
 

Forum List

Back
Top