Evidence. You know, that which can be shown.What evidence would you accept?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Evidence. You know, that which can be shown.What evidence would you accept?
ding's super on allegations, really short on support; does like to ask questions, though.You seem to have missed that stage and went right to a series of unsupported assertions.
Comes from worshipping the god of gaps.ding's super on allegations, really short on support; does like to ask questions, though.
But I haven't. At the heart of all philosophical discussions are observations of reality, logic and deductive reasoning. If you have never made and thought deeply about observations of reality you need not apply.You seem to have missed that stage and went right to a series of unsupported assertions.
That's how you need to see it because you aren't equipped to discuss it.ding's super on allegations, really short on support; does like to ask questions, though.
That's a common dead end argument of the dead end philosophy of atheism. Atheism is an intellectual dead end because it requires no intellect to deny everything.Comes from worshipping the god of gaps.
Like what exactly? Because apparently the universe popping into existence in an implausible manner being created from nothing and being improbably hardwired to become self aware isn't enough evidence for you. And I'm just scratching the surface of your ignorance of the evidence. And trust me when I say, I'm not even being creative here.Evidence. You know, that which can be shown.
His argument above allows him to dismiss any argument he does not like as "implausible". He is a lightweight poser.Like what exactly? Because apparently the universe popping into existence in an implausible manner being created from nothing and being improbably hardwired to become self aware isn't enough evidence for you. And I'm just scratching the surface of your ignorance of the evidence. And trust me when I say, I'm not even being creative here.
Maybe you'd like to discuss it in the bull ring.
makes sense. I've never been atheist, to speak of, so I can't say I know how they think but I agree they think like (above)That's a common dead end argument of the dead end philosophy of atheism. Atheism is an intellectual dead end because it requires no intellect to deny everything.
But that's not even the worst part of atheism. The worst part of atheism is there is no distinction between good and evil; only the satisfaction of material needs and primitive urges. There's no higher order to man. Just animal instincts and urges.
You don't have arguments for your beliefs. You only have arguments against the beliefs of others. You practice critical theory which is not to be confused with critical thinking which you don't do. So there is nothing for me to dismiss.His argument above allows him to dismiss any argument he does not like as "implausible". He is a lightweight poser.
The teachings of Jesus in every translation on earth back the JW,s as does true God worship history.ahhh... you know this how?
So now every translation has no errors?The teachings of Jesus in every translation on earth back the JW,s as does true God worship history.
I'm going to make a call out thread in the bull ring and have my way with you.Lightweight poser, yes. Give an OP and support it, then we can discuss.
Do it and debate yourself. I don't argue with fools who do not follow civility and the rules of argumentation.I'm going to make a call out thread in the bull ring and have my way with you.
I'm going to bend you over in the bull ring.Do it and debate yourself. I don't argue with fools who do not follow civility and the rules of argumentation.
Bottom line: state your position and give evidence. If you can't do this, you are a lightweight poser.
God preserved the teachings of Jesus, they are the same in every translation-barring-earth or land at Matt 5:5. All translations with Gods name removed in over 7000 places have errors. Done by satans will through Catholicism translating, the protestants did not correct much.So now every translation has no errors?
You know this how?God preserved the teachings of Jesus, they are the same in every translation-barring-earth or land at Matt 5:5. All translations with Gods name removed in over 7000 places have errors. Done by satans will through Catholicism translating, the protestants did not correct much.