Prager University says that _____ was the cause of the Civil War

The professor answered any and every question you can have.

My graduate degrees are as good as yours, yes. You have no idea.

No one said slavery was the only issue. It was the major issue, from which all other causes and symptoms flowed.

You can reject that, but your arguments won't stand in the face of the overwhelming problems of race and slavery. Not one.
Secession was the Constitutional reason.
“Corner Stone” Speech | Teaching American History

9th paragraph of the speech by the CSA VP A. Stephens: The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the “rock upon which the old Union would split.” He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact.
 
The professor answered any and every question you can have.

My graduate degrees are as good as yours, yes. You have no idea.

No one said slavery was the only issue. It was the major issue, from which all other causes and symptoms flowed.

You can reject that, but your arguments won't stand in the face of the overwhelming problems of race and slavery. Not one.
Secession was the Constitutional reason.
“Corner Stone” Speech | Teaching American History

9th paragraph of the speech by the CSA VP A. Stephens: The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the “rock upon which the old Union would split.” He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact.
The South had already, "lost its clue and its Cause"; they bore witness to our Declaration of Independence.

The South was upset about that form of "asset forfeiture" without compensation.

Those States have assume the right of deciding upon the propriety of our domestic institutions; and have denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States and recognized by the Constitution; they have denounced as sinful the institution of slavery; they have permitted open establishment among them of societies, whose avowed object is to disturb the peace and to eloign the property of the citizens of other States.
 
Yup, the South was terrified of a free society, rightfully so.

Lincoln's demands were simple: no slavery in the territories, return the seized federal property in the South, and act like grownups.
 
And yet Lincoln offered the south slavery forever, as long as they stayed in the union. If it was all about slavery, why did the south refuse his offer and chose to fight?

Because it wasn't about slavery, it was about the protectionist tariffs, the Homestead Acts, and the railroad subsidies, along with all the other Federal projects that would benefit the Midwest and other northern states to the exclusion of the southern states. Jake knows that, he's just a big crybaby and likes to think he had something to do with it all if he babbles about 'slavery n stuff' a hundred and fifty years later or something. He has no real acheivements in life so he needs to make up some.
South Carolina said it was about slavery...

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....


Declaration of Causes of Secession


In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.

So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?
 
gipper talking about being informed. ;)

The proposed Amendment shows clearly all of the problems were about slavery.

I see you are not getting it Jake. Sorry it is so difficult for you.

Lincoln INVADED the South. Lincoln started the WAR. He was the aggressor. He did so NOT to end slavery.

Does that help?
The war started when the south opened fire on a U.S. installation.
 
And yet Lincoln offered the south slavery forever, as long as they stayed in the union. If it was all about slavery, why did the south refuse his offer and chose to fight?

Because it wasn't about slavery, it was about the protectionist tariffs, the Homestead Acts, and the railroad subsidies, along with all the other Federal projects that would benefit the Midwest and other northern states to the exclusion of the southern states. Jake knows that, he's just a big crybaby and likes to think he had something to do with it all if he babbles about 'slavery n stuff' a hundred and fifty years later or something. He has no real acheivements in life so he needs to make up some.
South Carolina said it was about slavery...

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....


Declaration of Causes of Secession


In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.

So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?
The North believed the South had no Cause to secede; and insisted on recourse to our Second Amendment, to execute the laws of the Union.
 
gipper talking about being informed. ;)

The proposed Amendment shows clearly all of the problems were about slavery.

I see you are not getting it Jake. Sorry it is so difficult for you.

Lincoln INVADED the South. Lincoln started the WAR. He was the aggressor. He did so NOT to end slavery.

Does that help?
The war started when the south opened fire on a U.S. installation.
Yes, the beginning of the War of Southern aggression, against our more perfect Union.
 
And yet Lincoln offered the south slavery forever, as long as they stayed in the union. If it was all about slavery, why did the south refuse his offer and chose to fight?

Because it wasn't about slavery, it was about the protectionist tariffs, the Homestead Acts, and the railroad subsidies, along with all the other Federal projects that would benefit the Midwest and other northern states to the exclusion of the southern states. Jake knows that, he's just a big crybaby and likes to think he had something to do with it all if he babbles about 'slavery n stuff' a hundred and fifty years later or something. He has no real acheivements in life so he needs to make up some.
South Carolina said it was about slavery...

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....


Declaration of Causes of Secession


In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.

So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?
The North believed the South had no Cause to secede; and insisted on recourse to our Second Amendment, to execute the laws of the Union.
To the victors go the spoils. In this case, the spoils meant keeping the nation whole.
 
The north and west resorted to 2d Amendment rights to keep the Union whole.
 
And yet Lincoln offered the south slavery forever, as long as they stayed in the union. If it was all about slavery, why did the south refuse his offer and chose to fight?

Because it wasn't about slavery, it was about the protectionist tariffs, the Homestead Acts, and the railroad subsidies, along with all the other Federal projects that would benefit the Midwest and other northern states to the exclusion of the southern states. Jake knows that, he's just a big crybaby and likes to think he had something to do with it all if he babbles about 'slavery n stuff' a hundred and fifty years later or something. He has no real acheivements in life so he needs to make up some.
South Carolina said it was about slavery...

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....


Declaration of Causes of Secession


In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.

So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?
The North believed the South had no Cause to secede; and insisted on recourse to our Second Amendment, to execute the laws of the Union.
To the victors go the spoils. In this case, the spoils meant keeping the nation whole.

The north and west resorted to 2d Amendment rights to keep the Union whole.

We Kill you to keep you.

Statists are a murderous bunch.
 
And yet Lincoln offered the south slavery forever, as long as they stayed in the union. If it was all about slavery, why did the south refuse his offer and chose to fight?

Because it wasn't about slavery, it was about the protectionist tariffs, the Homestead Acts, and the railroad subsidies, along with all the other Federal projects that would benefit the Midwest and other northern states to the exclusion of the southern states. Jake knows that, he's just a big crybaby and likes to think he had something to do with it all if he babbles about 'slavery n stuff' a hundred and fifty years later or something. He has no real acheivements in life so he needs to make up some.
South Carolina said it was about slavery...

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....


Declaration of Causes of Secession


In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.

So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?
The North believed the South had no Cause to secede; and insisted on recourse to our Second Amendment, to execute the laws of the Union.
To the victors go the spoils. In this case, the spoils meant keeping the nation whole.

The north and west resorted to 2d Amendment rights to keep the Union whole.
We Kill you to keep you. Statists are a murderous bunch.
No more than libertarians. The first of the Bundy Ranch bunch was sentenced to eight years for his part in the stand off down at Bundyville. Such is the fate of all traitors.
 
Because it wasn't about slavery, it was about the protectionist tariffs, the Homestead Acts, and the railroad subsidies, along with all the other Federal projects that would benefit the Midwest and other northern states to the exclusion of the southern states. Jake knows that, he's just a big crybaby and likes to think he had something to do with it all if he babbles about 'slavery n stuff' a hundred and fifty years later or something. He has no real acheivements in life so he needs to make up some.
South Carolina said it was about slavery...

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....


Declaration of Causes of Secession


In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.

So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?
The North believed the South had no Cause to secede; and insisted on recourse to our Second Amendment, to execute the laws of the Union.
To the victors go the spoils. In this case, the spoils meant keeping the nation whole.

The north and west resorted to 2d Amendment rights to keep the Union whole.
We Kill you to keep you. Statists are a murderous bunch.
No more than libertarians. The first of the Bundy Ranch bunch was sentenced to eight years for his part in the stand off down at Bundyville. Such is the fate of all traitors.
You clearly have no understanding of libertarianism, but then I already knew that. However, you do get credit for admitting you agree with a murderous ideology.
 
South Carolina said it was about slavery...

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....


Declaration of Causes of Secession


In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.

So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?
The North believed the South had no Cause to secede; and insisted on recourse to our Second Amendment, to execute the laws of the Union.
To the victors go the spoils. In this case, the spoils meant keeping the nation whole.

The north and west resorted to 2d Amendment rights to keep the Union whole.
We Kill you to keep you. Statists are a murderous bunch.
No more than libertarians. The first of the Bundy Ranch bunch was sentenced to eight years for his part in the stand off down at Bundyville. Such is the fate of all traitors.
You clearly have no understanding of libertarianism, but then I already knew that. However, you do get credit for admitting you agree with a murderous ideology.
You can't hide the murderous nature of libertarianism, can you? It is the flip side to communism on the philosophy coin of control by cadre or elite.
 
The North believed the South had no Cause to secede; and insisted on recourse to our Second Amendment, to execute the laws of the Union.
To the victors go the spoils. In this case, the spoils meant keeping the nation whole.

The north and west resorted to 2d Amendment rights to keep the Union whole.
We Kill you to keep you. Statists are a murderous bunch.
No more than libertarians. The first of the Bundy Ranch bunch was sentenced to eight years for his part in the stand off down at Bundyville. Such is the fate of all traitors.
You clearly have no understanding of libertarianism, but then I already knew that. However, you do get credit for admitting you agree with a murderous ideology.
You can't hide the murderous nature of libertarianism, can you? It is the flip side to communism on the philosophy coin of control by cadre or elite.
Okay. Give me an example.
 
To the victors go the spoils. In this case, the spoils meant keeping the nation whole.

The north and west resorted to 2d Amendment rights to keep the Union whole.
We Kill you to keep you. Statists are a murderous bunch.
No more than libertarians. The first of the Bundy Ranch bunch was sentenced to eight years for his part in the stand off down at Bundyville. Such is the fate of all traitors.
You clearly have no understanding of libertarianism, but then I already knew that. However, you do get credit for admitting you agree with a murderous ideology.
You can't hide the murderous nature of libertarianism, can you? It is the flip side to communism on the philosophy coin of control by cadre or elite.
Okay. Give me an example.
You said I had no understanding of it, so you give an example. Whenever I look there are 24 to 29 'true' philosophies of libertarians. That proves none of you knows what it is. :lol:
 
We Kill you to keep you. Statists are a murderous bunch.
No more than libertarians. The first of the Bundy Ranch bunch was sentenced to eight years for his part in the stand off down at Bundyville. Such is the fate of all traitors.
You clearly have no understanding of libertarianism, but then I already knew that. However, you do get credit for admitting you agree with a murderous ideology.
You can't hide the murderous nature of libertarianism, can you? It is the flip side to communism on the philosophy coin of control by cadre or elite.
Okay. Give me an example.
You said I had no understanding of it, so you give an example. Whenever I look there are 24 to 29 'true' philosophies of libertarians. That proves none of you knows what it is. :lol:
Oh Jake. You are the one who claimed libertarians are just as violent as you murderous government loving statists. Now prove it.
 
No more than libertarians. The first of the Bundy Ranch bunch was sentenced to eight years for his part in the stand off down at Bundyville. Such is the fate of all traitors.
You clearly have no understanding of libertarianism, but then I already knew that. However, you do get credit for admitting you agree with a murderous ideology.
You can't hide the murderous nature of libertarianism, can you? It is the flip side to communism on the philosophy coin of control by cadre or elite.
Okay. Give me an example.
You said I had no understanding of it, so you give an example. Whenever I look there are 24 to 29 'true' philosophies of libertarians. That proves none of you knows what it is. :lol:
Oh Jake. You are the one who claimed libertarians are just as violent as you murderous government loving statists. Now prove it.
Oh, gipper, so you can't back your point. Are you saying libertarians are violent when they take control of a community? San Francisco, gold mining camps, frontier villages, Somalia? You telling porkies again?
 
And yet Lincoln offered the south slavery forever, as long as they stayed in the union. If it was all about slavery, why did the south refuse his offer and chose to fight?

Because it wasn't about slavery, it was about the protectionist tariffs, the Homestead Acts, and the railroad subsidies, along with all the other Federal projects that would benefit the Midwest and other northern states to the exclusion of the southern states. Jake knows that, he's just a big crybaby and likes to think he had something to do with it all if he babbles about 'slavery n stuff' a hundred and fifty years later or something. He has no real acheivements in life so he needs to make up some.
South Carolina said it was about slavery...

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....


Declaration of Causes of Secession


In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.

So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?

Why does a goofball like you think they know anything? They seceded over the introduction of the Morill Tariff Act being introduced to Congress, and saw it was going to pass. They also knew the Homestead Act and the Railroad Acts were going to pass; no reason to stay. Whether some modern era snowflakes like that or not is just too bad. In the 1862 elections Lincoln's faction only held on by the barest of margins, due entirely to his military control of the ballot boxes in the border states; his faction lost votes all over the Midwest and Atlantic states because many voters thought he was going to free the slaves and allow them to immigrate north and they would have to compete with cheap black labor. The South had already won all the Supreme Court battles over slavery, so it's just stupid to claim NC seceded over slavery; until Buchanan attempted to enforce his blockade at Sumter no other states seceded, after Sumter more states seceded, and after Lincoln deliberately copied Buchanan the rest seceded, which is exactly what he hoped would happen.

And again no one can claim secession was illegal, and can't show otherwise. Lincoln deliberately started a war, with an act of war.

If anyone needs to know what Lincoln's plans were for all those 'freed slaves' they like to think he fought a war over, all they need to do is look at how he handled their 'liberation' in the river states; he said they were, like 'free n stuff', but they had to remain on their plantations and work, for $2 a month, and they couldn't leave without written permission from the plantation owners, by then the owners being of course Republican supporters of Lincoln. See also the several hundred thousands of 'freed slaves' who died in 'property camps', herded there to prevent them from fleeing north and annoying all those alleged 'abolitionists' northern fictional histories have invented for themselves.
 
Last edited:
And yet Lincoln offered the south slavery forever, as long as they stayed in the union. If it was all about slavery, why did the south refuse his offer and chose to fight?

Because it wasn't about slavery, it was about the protectionist tariffs, the Homestead Acts, and the railroad subsidies, along with all the other Federal projects that would benefit the Midwest and other northern states to the exclusion of the southern states. Jake knows that, he's just a big crybaby and likes to think he had something to do with it all if he babbles about 'slavery n stuff' a hundred and fifty years later or something. He has no real acheivements in life so he needs to make up some.
South Carolina said it was about slavery...

On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .

We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....


Declaration of Causes of Secession


In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.

So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?

Why does a goofball like you think they know anything? They seceded over the introduction of the Morill Tariff Act being introduced to Congress, and saw it was going to pass. They also knew the Homestead Act and the Railroad Acts were going to pass; no reason to stay. Whether some modern era snowflakes like that or not is just too bad. In the 1862 elections Lincoln's faction only held on by the barest of margins, due entirely to his military control of the ballot boxes in the border states; his faction lost votes all over the Midwest and Atlantic states because many voters thought he was going to free the slaves and allow them to immigrate north and they would have to compete with cheap black labor. The South had already won all the Supreme Court battles over slavery, so it's just stupid to claim NC seceded over slavery; until Buchanan attempted to enforce his blockade at Sumter no other states seceded, after Sumter more states seveded, and after Lincoln deliberately copied Buchanan the rest seceded.

And again no one can claim secession was illegal, and can't show otherwise. Lincoln deliberately started a war, with an act of war.
LOLOL

I quoted South Carolina stating slavery was their big issue. Argue with them. :lol:
 
Confederate-Flag-Design.jpg
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: xyz

Forum List

Back
Top