Are libs claiming that its only the woman who cant het a divorce?
men are affected by the same law
And its only a delay not an outright ban
In a bifurcated divorce some matters can be settled later.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are libs claiming that its only the woman who cant het a divorce?
men are affected by the same law
And its only a delay not an outright ban
I doubt that also.
What liberals don't get about women - sorry, people with vulvas - is that they get married with the expectation of happily ever after, not in hopes of the double empowerment of a divorce and an abortion.
More semantics/The laws contradict eachother.
Even in the founding fathers time period, abortion before Quickening was not punishable by law, because the baby to be was not considered a person with rights, a life....until after quickening, after the baby stirs in the womb, around 20 weeks gestation...
==================
One of the most authoritative sources for learning law during the founding era was William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England. Blackstone, a distinguished English jurist, was so well-liked by the founding fathers that he was the second most frequently cited thinker in the American political writings of the founding era. American law students studied his work so religiously that Thomas Jefferson wrote to a friend that “Blackstone is to us what the Koran is to the Muslims.”
Blackstone affirmed in his Commentaries that an individual’s right to life is an “immediate gift of God.” This right to life is legally binding “as soon as an infant is able to stir in the mother’s womb.” Per Blackstone,
....
From these commentaries, the founding fathers learned that any abortion perpetrated after the stirring of an infant in the mother’s womb was a “heinous misdemeanor.”
American courts upheld this traditional common law approach in characterizing abortion as a misdemeanor. Founding father James Wilson, a signatory of the Declaration of Independence and original U.S. Supreme Court justice, taught his law students that,
More semantics/
You guys love to complicate the shit out of things.
It is a simple law that has a benefit to all involved.
Simply delays the divorce until both the child is born and custody is legally established.
That is the best outcome for the child because it forces lazy ass people to be responsible for the child.
Which has an added benefit of setting support.
Banning abortion after twenty weeks, and making such late-term abortions a misdemeanor would be a compromise which would please no one. Which is a sign of a good compromise.The laws contradict eachother.
Even in the founding fathers time period, abortion before Quickening was not punishable by law, because the baby to be was not considered a person with rights, a life....until after quickening, after the baby stirs in the womb, around 20 weeks gestation...
==================
One of the most authoritative sources for learning law during the founding era was William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England. Blackstone, a distinguished English jurist, was so well-liked by the founding fathers that he was the second most frequently cited thinker in the American political writings of the founding era. American law students studied his work so religiously that Thomas Jefferson wrote to a friend that “Blackstone is to us what the Koran is to the Muslims.”
Blackstone affirmed in his Commentaries that an individual’s right to life is an “immediate gift of God.” This right to life is legally binding “as soon as an infant is able to stir in the mother’s womb.” Per Blackstone,
....
From these commentaries, the founding fathers learned that any abortion perpetrated after the stirring of an infant in the mother’s womb was a “heinous misdemeanor.”
American courts upheld this traditional common law approach in characterizing abortion as a misdemeanor. Founding father James Wilson, a signatory of the Declaration of Independence and original U.S. Supreme Court justice, taught his law students that,
Well when was that law actually made? It's probably been on the books since the 1800s and before.![]()
Pregnant Women Can't Get Divorced in Missouri
The state's divorce law has come under more scrutiny since the overturning of Roe v. Wadewww.riverfronttimes.com
Its like the legal system is stacked against women. Like they are the property of their husbands. There is something dark and sinister going on in the most backward parts of America.
In general, the woman has never been severely punished out of compassion for what she is going through.... fear, uncertainty, rejection, health and financial worries etc that she's facing. .Banning abortion after twenty weeks, and making such late-term abortions a misdemeanor would be a compromise which would please no one. Which is a sign of a good compromise.
I've never thought that women who have abortions should be punished harshly. They are victims of the abortion industry. The doctors, for the most part, will be deterred by the possibility of a misdemeanor charge. If not, the laws can be adjusted and the penalties increased.
Yes, it’s called conservatism.There is something dark and sinister going on in the most backward parts of America.
There’s no ‘seems’ about it – it is a double-standard; yet another example of the dishonest right’s hypocrisy.Drake also points out what seems to be a double standard in regards to how the state treats an unborn child in a divorce proceeding compared to in abortion law.
She says that the whole basis for Missouri putting the pause on a divorce proceeding until a child is born is because Missouri divorce law "does not see fetuses as humans."
It was the guy's decision, before and when he donated his sperm, it was the girl's decision after she accepted the donation, and both of their previous decisions combined, that created his and her child, which he has to give some financial support for the next 18 yrs, and she has to give her time in life to, for the next 18 years. Seems fair imo.Not their body. Not their decision.
Yep. More white trash.
More liberal Progressive elitism for the white working class -- "white trash".
They're onto you now and hate Democrats, as they should. So keep going.
You really don't know the difference, do you?
I don't call groups of people names like that--except for Leftists and liberals, which is an unfortunate choice. Progressives are the snots who love to look down on people. "White trash" is that. You all pretend to care about "the little guy" but secretly sniff down your noses at them.
Well, not secretly anymore.
Always the man's faultIt was the guy's decision, before and when he donated his sperm, it was the girl's decision after she accepted the donation, and both of their previous decisions combined, that created his and her child, which he has to give some financial support for the next 18 yrs, and she has to give her time in life to, for the next 18 years. Seems fair imo.
Always the man's fault
It always was the guys fault to a degree, under societal pressure, married the girl they impregnated for the most part in the 1950s. Out of all marriages that had babies their first year of marriage in the 1950s, 70% of those married couples delivered their babies 7 months or earlier in to their marriage.... Sex outside of marriage occurred, but a guy was pressured or just felt obligated, to give their child a name, and girlfriend some respect.Always the man's fault
And yet...women initiate two divorces in three.I doubt that also.
What liberals don't get about women - sorry, people with vulvas - is that they get married with the expectation of happily ever after, not in hopes of the double empowerment of a divorce and an abortion.