Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lordy, lordy, another damned 'Conservative' that cannot read. No geologic change, as in the fossil record. Of course there is evidence of the reversal in the rocks, or we would not know about the reversals. In fact, in Steens Mountain there is a rather complete record of a reversal in the basalt layers.There is no geological evidence of polar reversals? You're dumber than a rock. How do you think we know it happens?Exactly. And in the geologic record, there is no evidence of any kind of change during or after those reversals, which occur about every 200,000 years. That is an average, and that varies radically. As little as 50,000, to as much as a million years.Another Leftard scientist. Yeah, magnetic fields have nothing to do with electricity.Go look up EMP and stop exposing your ignorance.
An EMP has nothing to do with the reversal of the poles.
View attachment 58169
Dont know where you've been but i'm about as far right as you can get.
The science on the effects of pole reversal vary from no real changes to damage from the sun due to a weak magnetic field that weakens the ozone layer.
Leftards and common sense shall never meet.
And a death wish to add to my collection. Excellent!
What? You have already advocated for the deaths of all the sceptics so take your mock outrage and shove it up your ass you fucking hypocrite!
When I want to advocate death for deniers, you'll know it. Till then, I have my collection to illustrate the extreme variability of your sensitivity to this. I have 37 instances of deniers making a variety of death wishes against "warmists" and neither you nor SSDD nor Frank nor FCT nor Westwall nor the management here have voiced one single word of complaint. But, for my hypothetical, in response to the very real suicide request from Ms Stephanie (to whom you've all never said a thing), I get agony and outrage over and over and over again.
You people are - demonstrably - complete shite.
BTW, Global warming is real. The corrections being made to datasets are all justified. Human activity is responsible for more than 50% (very likely much more) of the warming observed over the last 150 years and particularly the last 50. That is based on good science making use of mountains of empirical evidence and very capable and demonstrably accurate GCMs.
Lordy, lordy, another damned 'Conservative' that cannot read. No geologic change, as in the fossil record. Of course there is evidence of the reversal in the rocks, or we would not know about the reversals. In fact, in Steens Mountain there is a rather complete record of a reversal in the basalt layers.There is no geological evidence of polar reversals? You're dumber than a rock. How do you think we know it happens?Exactly. And in the geologic record, there is no evidence of any kind of change during or after those reversals, which occur about every 200,000 years. That is an average, and that varies radically. As little as 50,000, to as much as a million years.Another Leftard scientist. Yeah, magnetic fields have nothing to do with electricity.An EMP has nothing to do with the reversal of the poles.
View attachment 58169
Dont know where you've been but i'm about as far right as you can get.
The science on the effects of pole reversal vary from no real changes to damage from the sun due to a weak magnetic field that weakens the ozone layer.
Leftards and common sense shall never meet.
And a death wish to add to my collection. Excellent!
What? You have already advocated for the deaths of all the sceptics so take your mock outrage and shove it up your ass you fucking hypocrite!
When I want to advocate death for deniers, you'll know it. Till then, I have my collection to illustrate the extreme variability of your sensitivity to this. I have 37 instances of deniers making a variety of death wishes against "warmists" and neither you nor SSDD nor Frank nor FCT nor Westwall nor the management here have voiced one single word of complaint. But, for my hypothetical, in response to the very real suicide request from Ms Stephanie (to whom you've all never said a thing), I get agony and outrage over and over and over again.
You people are - demonstrably - complete shite.
BTW, Global warming is real. The corrections being made to datasets are all justified. Human activity is responsible for more than 50% (very likely much more) of the warming observed over the last 150 years and particularly the last 50. That is based on good science making use of mountains of empirical evidence and very capable and demonstrably accurate GCMs.
Of course global warming is real. It started 14,000 years ago in this last interglacial period. Any literate person knows that. So why don't you?
The only people I argue with are idiots. Like you.Your babblling Mr Westwall. Old Rocks is correct. Weatherman, a right-winger, seems to be the idiot in this conversation, arguing with HereWeGoAgain, another right-winger.. Most kids learn about the record of pole reversals as the Atlantic basin was formed by spreading from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge in middle school. So, hey, I'm impressed.
White House is preparing for catastrophic solar flares which could wipe out power around the world for months - bringing an end to modern civilization as we know it
- Massive electromagnetic pulse caused by solar flares could bring an end to modern civilization as we know it
- Extreme space weather event could wipe out power for months and render cellphones and internet useless
- One study estimates that in the U.S. alone it could cost the fragile economy up to $2.6 trillion
- Now the White House are preparing for the threat after a major solar flare narrowly missed the Earth in 2012
- Strategy includes improving prediction abilities as forecasters only have been 15-60 minutes warning and how to protect energy grids
Read more: White House is preparing for catastrophic solar flares
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Far more likely than an asteroid impact.
Your babblling Mr Westwall. Old Rocks is correct. Weatherman, a right-winger, seems to be the idiot in this conversation, arguing with HereWeGoAgain, another right-winger.. Most kids learn about the record of pole reversals as the Atlantic basin was formed by spreading from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge in middle school. So, hey, I'm impressed.
Record yourself on your phone reading your last post out loud. Then play it back to a perfect stranger and ask him what he thinks of it.
All that crap about PALEO? That was babbling. Bringing up the striping from the MAR (that every school kid knows) as if you'd dropped a scientific bombshell? That was babbling.
Global warming is real. The corrections are justified. AGW is valid. We need to act.
Them's the facts, Jack.
How about starting with shutting down your computer?Global warming is real. The corrections are justified. AGW is valid. We need to act.
Them's the facts, Jack.
Paleo is the normal shortcut for referring to the fossil record so no, it is not babbling.
olfraud was wrong, as you 'tards always are.
olfraud brought up Steens mountains as a source for pole reversal evidence
and while it is true it does indeed record pole reversals it has nothing to do with the more recent reversals.
The nature of mountain building renders them immaterial.
The MAR is THE most accurate record we have though the Juan De Fuca ridge likewise has a good record, though of much shorter duration.
Funny how olfraud would choose a locale that is irrelevant while ignoring a local source that is quite good though of shorter duration.
Yes, global warming as a concept is real.
The rality is it comes in cycles. We are currently static and possibly going cool. We honestly don't know yet.
And no, NONE of the "corrections" are justified. They are a gross example of academic fraud. Something you silly people excel at.
AGW is a failed theory
with little to no empirical evidence to support it any longer.
Paleo is the normal shortcut for referring to the fossil record so no, it is not babbling.
Babbling. Easily as bad as me correcting other folks' typos.
olfraud was wrong, as you 'tards always are.
That is a lie. Everything Old Rocks said was correct.
olfraud brought up Steens mountains as a source for pole reversal evidence
An indication that he's every bit the geologist he claims to be and more of one than you.
and while it is true it does indeed record pole reversals it has nothing to do with the more recent reversals.
So the fuck what? The discussion was not being limited or concentrating on RECENT pole reversals. Your scrambling for an excuse and losing.
The nature of mountain building renders them immaterial.
It renders them rare. And Steens is famous for being the first place that evidence for fast reversals were ever found.
The MAR is THE most accurate record we have though the Juan De Fuca ridge likewise has a good record, though of much shorter duration.
Wrong. The MAR is the longest record but like other proxies that have come up around here, its chronological resolution is poor. It was considered adequate until fast flipping was discovered at Steens.
Funny how olfraud would choose a locale that is irrelevant while ignoring a local source that is quite good though of shorter duration.
Funny how a fellow claiming a PhD in geology would fail to know the significance of Steens Mountain
Yes, global warming as a concept is real.
It's slightly more than a concept, numbnuts.
The rality is it comes in cycles. We are currently static and possibly going cool. We honestly don't know yet.
We know this:
And no, NONE of the "corrections" are justified. They are a gross example of academic fraud. Something you silly people excel at.
That opinion might actually have some value if at least one of all the deniers on Earth had ever actually examined the justifications provided by the various dataset holders. But you haven't. All you EVER do is look at the direction. If you think it's going to make warming look worse, you declare it a lie. Is that how your good science works?
AGW is a failed theory
That is a lie and a very stupid one. AGW is a very widely accepted theory.
with little to no empirical evidence to support it any longer.
Any longer? What does that mean? It has mountains of evidence. You just lack the balls to admit the truth.
Then bring something to the argument. Refute the justifications being provided for those data corrections with something besides "I don't like it".
What a shit you are.
You're funny. How about you present us a compelling reason for the changes to occur.
Record yourself on your phone reading your last post out loud. Then play it back to a perfect stranger and ask him what he thinks of it.
All that crap about PALEO? That was babbling. Bringing up the striping from the MAR (that every school kid knows) as if you'd dropped a scientific bombshell? That was babbling.
Global warming is real. The corrections are justified. AGW is valid. We need to act.
Them's the facts, Jack.
I would like to correct something here. I am not a geologist, at least not yet. I am a 72 year old millwright, still working full time in a steel mill, and taking courses at a university toward getting a degree in Geology.Paleo is the normal shortcut for referring to the fossil record so no, it is not babbling.
Babbling. Easily as bad as me correcting other folks' typos.
olfraud was wrong, as you 'tards always are.
That is a lie. Everything Old Rocks said was correct.
olfraud brought up Steens mountains as a source for pole reversal evidence
An indication that he's every bit the geologist he claims to be and more of one than you.
and while it is true it does indeed record pole reversals it has nothing to do with the more recent reversals.
So the fuck what? The discussion was not being limited or concentrating on RECENT pole reversals. Your scrambling for an excuse and losing.
The nature of mountain building renders them immaterial.
It renders them rare. And Steens is famous for being the first place that evidence for fast reversals were ever found.
The MAR is THE most accurate record we have though the Juan De Fuca ridge likewise has a good record, though of much shorter duration.
Wrong. The MAR is the longest record but like other proxies that have come up around here, its chronological resolution is poor. It was considered adequate until fast flipping was discovered at Steens.
Funny how olfraud would choose a locale that is irrelevant while ignoring a local source that is quite good though of shorter duration.
Funny how a fellow claiming a PhD in geology would fail to know the significance of Steens Mountain
Yes, global warming as a concept is real.
It's slightly more than a concept, numbnuts.
The rality is it comes in cycles. We are currently static and possibly going cool. We honestly don't know yet.
We know this:
And no, NONE of the "corrections" are justified. They are a gross example of academic fraud. Something you silly people excel at.
That opinion might actually have some value if at least one of all the deniers on Earth had ever actually examined the justifications provided by the various dataset holders. But you haven't. All you EVER do is look at the direction. If you think it's going to make warming look worse, you declare it a lie. Is that how your good science works?
AGW is a failed theory
That is a lie and a very stupid one. AGW is a very widely accepted theory.
with little to no empirical evidence to support it any longer.
Any longer? What does that mean? It has mountains of evidence. You just lack the balls to admit the truth.
