President Trump just filed a lawsuit against Hillary over the "Russian Collusion" allegations

[protectionist]

Into the toilet like the other lawsuits. The Traitor keeps filing lawsuits and keeps losing them. No proof (plenty allegations....no proof) of Mr. Obama spying on him. No proof of Vote Fraud...the loser keeps losing on.

Liberals keep on lying ...or could they actually be this ignorant ?

 

[protectionist]

how'd it turn out?

Everybody knows how _ Kangaroo Court.

 

[bravoactual]

Oh Dear.....Oh My.....Oh Fuck the Fucking 5-Deferment Dodging Traitor.

10th. Circuit Court Agrees With Dimissal of Election Lawsuit Against Dominion.

10th Circuit agrees with dismissal of election lawsuit against Dominion

The federal appeals court based in Denver has agreed with a trial judge's decision dismissing a lawsuit alleging the 2020 election was rigged by Dominion Voting Systems, Facebook and others.

www.coloradopolitics.com

The federal appeals court based in Denver has agreed with a trial judge's decision dismissing a lawsuit that claimed the 2020 election was rigged by Dominion Voting Systems, Facebook and others.

Eight voters from across the country filed a lawsuit after the 2020 presidential election alleging various types of election interference and seeking $160 billion in damages. In April 2021, U.S. Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter dismissed the case after finding the plaintiffs had no standing, which requires a specific injury attributable to the defendants.

Claims of election fraud have failed to withstand scrutiny. The Associated Press reported in December that out of more than 25 million votes cast in six battleground states in 2020 — not including Colorado — there were fewer than 500 cases of voter fraud, far too few to influence the outcome.

Attention.....Attention....All Sycofantic Brain Dead Followers of the 5-Deferement Draft Dodging Coward.

IN ORDER TO PROVE VOTER FRUAD, YOU MUST HAVE CLEAR AND CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT SUCH CHARGE OF VOTER FRAUD. YOU ARE FREE TO GO RUN AROUND YOUR MOTHER'S BASEMENT IN SHIT STAINED TIGHTY WHITIES AND EATING PEANUT BUTTER SANDWICHES, THE ONLY SANDWICH YOU KNOW HOW TO MAKE.

 

[bravoactual]

In more bad news for Putin's Ass Kissing Orange Faced 5-Deferment Draft Dodging Coward, Former Lying Asshole Aid Peter Navarro Subpoenaed.

Former Trump aide Navarro says he has received a grand jury subpoena related to Jan. 6

He claims they have asked for records of “any communications” with the former president.

www.politico.com

Peter Navarro, a former White House aide to Donald Trump, says he’s been served a grand jury subpoena by federal prosecutors probing the Jan. 6 insurrection — and claims they have asked for records of “any communications” with the former president.

In a draft lawsuit that Navarro began circulating Monday, the former Trump trade adviser said “two FBI special agents banged loudly on my door in the early morning hours” on May 26 and served him a subpoena signed by Matthew Graves, the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C.

 

[AntonToo]

Yeah, like the Sussmann trial where the Judge and 4 pro-hillary jurors made sure Sussmann was not convicted.

You snowflakes can't seem to understand not being convicted doesn't mean mot guilty.

Hillary's own campaign manager, the FBI, Sussmann's own billing records, and his e-mail the judge ordered the jury to forget prov3d Sussmann was guilty, open and shut...
but you traitorous snowflakes applaud Democrat manipulation and bastardization of the Judivial process.

Which jurors did prosecutor not agree to? Oh wait, they agreed to all of them, so save that bs for someone else

 

[bravoactual]

Which jurors did prosecutor not agree to? Oh wait, they agreed to all of them, so save that bs for someone else

MAGA Meatheads will always see a conspiracy if they lose. Prosecution lack any evidence to support the charges they filed. They lose the bitch, and we have a one whole fucking lot of bitching from them lately.

 

[easyt65]

Which jurors did prosecutor not agree to? Oh wait, they agreed to all of them, so save that bs for someone else

Prosecutors only have a limited number iof challenges to remove jurors. Durham did not agree to allow a Hillary-friendly judge and 4 Hillary donors / supporters on the jury, dumbass.

 

[AntonToo]

Prosecutors only have a limited number iof challenges to remove jurors. Durham did not agree to allow a Hillary-friendly judge and 4 Hillary donors / supporters on the jury, dumbass.

Notbags like you always have the same song and dance. As soon as your bullshit gets a reality check you start to blame the referees instead of accepting being wrong like a man.

Not a second to pause before shitting all over our justice system.

Jurors delivered a UNANIMOUS decision in just 60 min of deliberation. Each and every juror was convinced there is no merit to charges. And here you are, trying to spin that demolition of Durham's case as nothing but bias injustice.

Get lost loser, no one is buying your pathetic horseshit.

 

[easyt65]

Notbags like you always have the same song and dance. As soon as your bullshit gets a reality check you start to blame the referees instead of accepting being wrong like a man.

Not a second to pause before shitting all over our justice system.

Jurors delivered a UNANIMOUS decision in just 60 min of deliberation. Each and every juror was convinced there is no merit to charges. And here you are, trying to spin that demolition of Durham's case as nothing but bias injustice.

Get lost loser, no one is buying your pathetic horseshit.

By claiming 4 Hillary supporters on the Sussman jury and a pro-Hillary judge had nopact on the Sussmann trial acquittal you are self-identifying as a leftist nutbag who should be ignored.

Thank you for playing.

 

[AntonToo]

By claiming 4 Hillary supporters on the Sussman jury and a pro-Hillary judge had nopact on the Sussmann trial acquittal you are self-identifying as a leftist nutbag who should be ignored.

Thank you for playing.

BS, if there was there there and even ONE jurror that thought there was merit they sure as hell would not be done in just one hour.

You are not claiming bias because you were in that room. You have ZERO CLUE about the deliberations. All you know is that you don't like the verdict so you go straigh to shitting on the jurors and the court.

Take your games and shove them up your ass loser.

 

[Kondor3]

I have not thought this worth tracking, given the dishonest nature of the plaintiff...

So... just checking-in... it's been a while... is The Orange Liar-in-Chief getting anywhere with this one...?

 

[easyt65]

BS, if there was there there and even ONE jurror that thought there was merit they sure as hell would not be done in just one hour.

You are not claiming bias because you were in that room. You have ZERO CLUE about the deliberations. All you know is that you don't like the verdict so you go straigh to shitting on the jurors and the court.

Take your games and shove them up your ass loser.

The foreman of the jury said in an interview at the end of the trial they thought FROM THE VERY BEGINNING Sussmann should never have been tried.


From. the lead jurors own mouth, snowflake, she admitted they were biased from the very start.

in othet words the head juror just called you an ignorant dumbass who has no idea what you are talking about.

 

[Clipper]

Prosecutors only have a limited number iof challenges to remove jurors. Durham did not agree to allow a Hillary-friendly judge and 4 Hillary donors / supporters on the jury, dumbass.

So Durham had his ass handed back to him by the jury on a charge that Sussman lied to the F.B.I. & you Trump asseaters are now up in arms over it?

Is that the same F.B.I. that you Bozos led by the nose by Trump are always bitching about as partisan hacks?

 

[AntonToo]

The foreman of the jury said in an interview at the end of the trial they thought FROM THE VERY BEGINNING Sussmann should never have been tried.

No he didn't moron.

He didn't say thats what he thought from beginning.

What he said was that given the insignificance of the possible lie, the descision to go to trial was a total waste.

To be convicted of lying to FBI you not only have to knowingly make false statements, but they also have to be significant to the course of investigation.

Sussman's statement to FBI that he was not bringing evidence of possible crime as a representative of Clinton campaign was not proven false. But even if he lied and was giving evidence to FBI only as part of his job for campaign, even so, jury was not convinced such lie had any serious significance to the investigation.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No he didn't moron.

He didn't say thats what he thought from beginning.

What he said was that given the flimsy evidence they were presented, descision to trial was a waste of time.

Exactly.

Some paid jackass grabbed that and made hay out of it, now they all, to a man, parrot it.

 

[easyt65]

BS, if there was there there and even ONE jurror that thought there was merit they sure as hell would not be done in just one hour.

You are not claiming bias because you were in that room. You have ZERO CLUE about the deliberations. All you know is that you don't like the verdict so you go straigh to shitting on the jurors and the court.

Take your games and shove them up your ass loser.

The foreman of the jury said in am interview at the end of the trial they thought FROM THE VERY BEGINMING Sussmann should never have been tried.


From. the lead jurors own mouth, snowflake, she admitted they were biased from the very start.

The head juror just called you an ignorant dumbass who has no idea what you are talking about

So Durham had his ass handed back to him by the jury on a charge that Sussman lied to the F.B.I. & you Trump asseaters are now up in arms over it?

Way to self-identify as a POS who doesn't care about the law or true justice in court.

No wonder why you snowflakes love tge Democrats so much - they are lawless,lying g, corrupt, criminal, seditious, treasonous POS f*ets - the kind of people you can relate to.

 

[easyt65]

Umm, yes dummy, if you have no case then you should not go to trial. DUH.

Good thing Durham had an open and shut case.

Better yet for Syssmann the deck was stacked in his favor from the start.

Syssmann claimed he was not working for anyone.

Baker said Sussmann td him he was there on his own but knew he represented / worked for Hillary.

Sussman's text the judge would not allow was a confession / admission he was working for Hillary

Hillary's own campaign manager testified Sussmann took the Russian propaganda to the FBI after Hillary told him to.

Sussman's own billing records show Sussmann charged Hillary for his services for the exact hour on the exact day he met Baker and delivered the bs Russian lies to Baker. His records even show he billed Hillary for the 2 USB drives on which the Russian propaganda was in that he gave Baker.

All of which proves you're a stupid idiot who can't understand any of that.

Instead, all you can muster is blind loyalty and ignorance in defense of a jury rendering a decision based on bias instead of the evidence, to include Sussmann's confession (which the judge blocked),which proved undeniably Sussmann was guilty.

 

[DBA]

Good thing Durham had an open and shut case.

Better yet for Syssmann the deck was stacked in his favor from the start.

Syssmann claimed he was not working for anyone.

Baker said Sussmann td him he was there on his own but knew he represented / worked for Hillary.

Sussman's text the judge would not allow was a confession / admission he was working for Hillary

Hillary's own campaign manager testified Sussmann took the Russian propaganda to the FBI after Hillary told him to.

Sussman's own billing records show Sussmann charged Hillary for his services for the exact hour on the exact day he met Baker and delivered the bs Russian lies to Baker. His records even show he billed Hillary for the 2 USB drives on which the Russian propaganda was in that he gave Baker.

All of which proves you're a stupid idiot who can't understand any of that.

Instead, all you can muster is blind loyalty and ignorance in defense of a jury rendering a decision based on bias instead of the evidence, to include Sussmann's confession (which the judge blocked),which proved undeniably Sussmann was guilty.

They don't care. Defend at all cost.

 

[g5000]

Durham's indictment did not go beyond Sussman. That's it, kids. That's all there is.

All these years you've been waiting for the imminent arrest of Hillary Clinton, Peter Strzok, Andrew Weissmann, James Comey, Sally Yates, Rod Rosenstein, John Brennan, James Clapper, and Susan Rice was a giant hoax, and all you have to show for it are some blisters on your hands.

Add this to every other lie you swallowed.

 

[basquebromance]