Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a coup d’état. You are claiming in effect that the Second Amendment has been repealed and guns are banned except for working cops on the beat and active duty military.Militia police and private security are all subordinate to civil authority. You have a point?
The only paramilitary groups that I know of that were there were the police officers one of whom shot a civilian to death and needs to be held accountable by civil authority. Your other charges remain unproved.Yes. Do you think the paramilitary groups that showed up on January 6th knew they were subordinate to civilian authority while they were beating police officers to death and chanting "hang Mike Pence"?Militia police and private security are all subordinate to civil authority. You have a point?State organized. "Subordinate to civilian authority".It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.www.nbcnews.com
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
Tenn. Const. art. I, § 24. Military subordinate to civil authority That the sure and certain defense of a free people, is a well regulated militia;
That's not a private military.
Next.
They are or were police officers? That's a big difference, seeing as how former cops, even as felons, are always permitted to possess and carry firearms for personal protection.The only paramilitary groups that I know of that were there were the police officers
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
Point your post elsewhere. You didn't get that from anything I wrote.That's a coup d’état. You are claiming in effect that the Second Amendment has been repealed and guns are banned except for working cops on the beat and active duty military.Militia police and private security are all subordinate to civil authority. You have a point?
In other words the Democrats are openly admitting to the coup d’état whereby they installed an imposter in the Oval Office as a dictator without holding a properly certified, free and fair election in accordance with international peace treaty principles and due process of law, and all legal challenges heard on their merits in court. Nor do they have any Constitutional basis to impeach a President who has already been forced out of office by the Democrats with an illegal coup d’état.The 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.constitutioncenter.org
You're saying if some guy with a MAGA baseball cap has a gun, and a small town mayor revokes his gun rights and orders him to turn it in, he just has to obey? No recourse? No defense in court? No appeal? No process for restoration of civil rights?Point your post elsewhere. You didn't get that from anything I wrote.
If you'd bothered to follow the thread instead of just spewing nonsense for a change you'd have actually read the post that you quoted, which was mine and not the OP.Not the one I posted.You didn't read the link.It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
It's not?
"Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
www.nbcnews.com"
Then what, exactly, is the first word I copied from the OP?
the word OPINION was the first word of the Link.
Did you MISS that?
Not the one I posted.You didn't read the link.It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
It's not?
"Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
www.nbcnews.com"
Then what, exactly, is the first word I copied from the OP?
the word OPINION was the first word of the Link.
Did you MISS that?
Odd, I was responding to the OP.
Which CLEARLY says 'Opinion'.
tRumplings, I swear.
Lies.The only paramilitary groups that I know of that were there were the police officers one of whom shot a civilian to death and needs to be held accountable by civil authority. Your other charges remain unproved.Yes. Do you think the paramilitary groups that showed up on January 6th knew they were subordinate to civilian authority while they were beating police officers to death and chanting "hang Mike Pence"?Militia police and private security are all subordinate to civil authority. You have a point?State organized. "Subordinate to civilian authority".It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
Tenn. Const. art. I, § 24. Military subordinate to civil authority That the sure and certain defense of a free people, is a well regulated militia;
That's not a private military.
Next.
The militia was intended for the public . To protect them from invasion of a hostile country or a rogue government that are violating our constitutional rights.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Hey Doc. You know you are walking around with your guts hanging out all over. You need a stich job Jack.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Once more, for the hard of thinking.If you'd bothered to follow the thread instead of just spewing nonsense for a change you'd have actually read the post that you quoted, which was mine and not the OP.Not the one I posted.You didn't read the link.It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
It's not?
"Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
www.nbcnews.com"
Then what, exactly, is the first word I copied from the OP?
the word OPINION was the first word of the Link.
Did you MISS that?
Not the one I posted.You didn't read the link.It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
It's not?
"Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
www.nbcnews.com"
Then what, exactly, is the first word I copied from the OP?
the word OPINION was the first word of the Link.
Did you MISS that?
Odd, I was responding to the OP.
Which CLEARLY says 'Opinion'.
tRumplings, I swear.
I quoted Dr Love, you responded to me.
Maybe if YOU read the thread...
You must be shaking your fist at the sky that your wrist will soon be strained Bingo.Lies.The only paramilitary groups that I know of that were there were the police officers one of whom shot a civilian to death and needs to be held accountable by civil authority. Your other charges remain unproved.Yes. Do you think the paramilitary groups that showed up on January 6th knew they were subordinate to civilian authority while they were beating police officers to death and chanting "hang Mike Pence"?Militia police and private security are all subordinate to civil authority. You have a point?State organized. "Subordinate to civilian authority".It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
Tenn. Const. art. I, § 24. Military subordinate to civil authority That the sure and certain defense of a free people, is a well regulated militia;
That's not a private military.
Next.
Already charged are members of The Three Percenters, The Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, Texas Freedom Force, and several others I can't remember right now, but they are all illegal paramilitary groups without civilian government oversight.
Get your state to form a militia.That's a coup d’état. You are claiming in effect that the Second Amendment has been repealed and guns are banned except for working cops on the beat and active duty military.Militia police and private security are all subordinate to civil authority. You have a point?
In other words the Democrats are openly admitting to the coup d’état whereby they installed an imposter in the Oval Office as a dictator without holding a properly certified, free and fair election in accordance with international peace treaty principles and due process of law, and all legal challenges heard on their merits in court. Nor do they have any Constitutional basis to impeach a President who has already been forced out of office by the Democrats with an illegal coup d’état.The 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.constitutioncenter.org
Why do you post with third grade grammar?You must be shaking your fist at the sky that your wrist will soon be strained Bingo.Lies.The only paramilitary groups that I know of that were there were the police officers one of whom shot a civilian to death and needs to be held accountable by civil authority. Your other charges remain unproved.Yes. Do you think the paramilitary groups that showed up on January 6th knew they were subordinate to civilian authority while they were beating police officers to death and chanting "hang Mike Pence"?Militia police and private security are all subordinate to civil authority. You have a point?State organized. "Subordinate to civilian authority".It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
Tenn. Const. art. I, § 24. Military subordinate to civil authority That the sure and certain defense of a free people, is a well regulated militia;
That's not a private military.
Next.
Already charged are members of The Three Percenters, The Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, Texas Freedom Force, and several others I can't remember right now, but they are all illegal paramilitary groups without civilian government oversight.
The militia is necessary and all, but in a free state, the people have the right to keep and bear Arms without any infringements or roadblocks.Get your state to form a militia.
That's how it's supposed to be done.
Once more, for the hard of thinking.If you'd bothered to follow the thread instead of just spewing nonsense for a change you'd have actually read the post that you quoted, which was mine and not the OP.Not the one I posted.You didn't read the link.It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
It's not?
"Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
www.nbcnews.com"
Then what, exactly, is the first word I copied from the OP?
the word OPINION was the first word of the Link.
Did you MISS that?
Not the one I posted.You didn't read the link.It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
It's not?
"Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
www.nbcnews.com"
Then what, exactly, is the first word I copied from the OP?
the word OPINION was the first word of the Link.
Did you MISS that?
Odd, I was responding to the OP.
Which CLEARLY says 'Opinion'.
tRumplings, I swear.
I quoted Dr Love, you responded to me.
Maybe if YOU read the thread...
I posted a link to a scholarly article that wasn't an opinion when I quoted you. You then quoted me, obviously without bothering to read the link, quite possibly without even reading the two word post it was attached to.
tRumplings... Sigh.
They are vigilantes. For every one taken down ten will take his place.Lies.The only paramilitary groups that I know of that were there were the police officers one of whom shot a civilian to death and needs to be held accountable by civil authority. Your other charges remain unproved.Yes. Do you think the paramilitary groups that showed up on January 6th knew they were subordinate to civilian authority while they were beating police officers to death and chanting "hang Mike Pence"?Militia police and private security are all subordinate to civil authority. You have a point?State organized. "Subordinate to civilian authority".It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
Tenn. Const. art. I, § 24. Military subordinate to civil authority That the sure and certain defense of a free people, is a well regulated militia;
That's not a private military.
Next.
Already charged are members of The Three Percenters, The Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, Texas Freedom Force, and several others I can't remember right now, but they are all illegal paramilitary groups without civilian government oversight.
Not the one I posted.You didn't read the link.It's not an opinion.Behold Truth (ya Loons :~)
Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
Your link says it's an opinion.
what makes it 'truth'?
It's not?
"Opinion | What's the difference between a private militia and an armed mob? Nothing.
A militia operates under the authority of the president or a governor; if it doesn’t, it’s just an armed mob.
www.nbcnews.com"
Then what, exactly, is the first word I copied from the OP?
the word OPINION was the first word of the Link.
Did you MISS that?
I said nothing remotely like that. Try reading what I actually write. Maybe that'll lessen your confusion.You're saying if some guy with a MAGA baseball cap has a gun, and a small town mayor revokes his gun rights and orders him to turn it in, he just has to obey? No recourse? No defense in court? No appeal? No process for restoration of civil rights?Point your post elsewhere. You didn't get that from anything I wrote.
