Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Private-sector payrolls increased more than expected in November, the most in five months and the latest indication of steady U.S. job growth.
Private payrolls in the U.S. rose by 217,000, said payroll processor Automatic Data Processing Inc. and forecasting firm Moody’s Analytics. The report is based on data collected from ADP clients in addition to lagged government data.
Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal expected an increase of 192,000.
Meanwhile, the October gain was revised up to 196,000 from 182,000.
What has the white house done,other than be around when the,you didn't build that crowd moves ahead regardless of Obama policies? Just what specific policies that the white house is responsible for, that they should get credit for?
Why do you think the report is fake? I mean, besides just deciding it is. You know the WSJ is just reporting and it's not their numbers, right?"...you want us to be happy about a fake jobs report from a "newspaper" that wouldn't know the truth if it hit them square in the face?
Here's the actual report: ADP National Employment Report | November 2015Just curious, do you know what kind of jobs were created? Were any of them self-supporting living wage jobs? How many were part-time, low-wage, and temporary jobs? How many illegals were hired? Were any of the jobs given to imported workers? How many were seasonal due to the Christmas shopping season? Any idea? Any numbers? Thanks.
From my subscription time to WSJ I observed two things:Why do you think the report is fake? I mean, besides just deciding it is. You know the WSJ is just reporting and it's not their numbers, right?"...you want us to be happy about a fake jobs report from a "newspaper" that wouldn't know the truth if it hit them square in the face?
What does that have to do with the ADP jobs report?From my subscription time to WSJ I observed two things:Why do you think the report is fake? I mean, besides just deciding it is. You know the WSJ is just reporting and it's not their numbers, right?"...you want us to be happy about a fake jobs report from a "newspaper" that wouldn't know the truth if it hit them square in the face?
WSJ LOVES Migrant/Illegal Alien Slave Labor. They run sob stories all the time about "Estrelita" and her 3 or 4 kids "struggling" to access Health Care, Schooling or whatever benefit a MALDEF Lawyer thinks they're entitled to regardless of their Legal Status. America is a Pig to be sucked off of by anyone.
WSJ thinks Big Business CAN DO NO WRONG! And they should NEVER have to pay for ANY Social Benefits to the Illegal Alien Slave Labor that they LOVE and prefer over Americans!
The WSJ thinks America exists ONLY to provide Work Permits for the Cheap Labor and it's citizens are here to provide a Tax Base THEY DON'T WANNA' PAY!
If they don't get it they threaten to move jobs overseas (and have been successful so far)
One of The Federal Reserve's Dual Mandates is Full Employment. You think there would be any bias there? Naw!The ADP, hoping to make its data more accurate, made some major changes for its October 2012 report. That month, the ADP started using ADP payroll data, BLS employment data, and the Philadelphia Federal Reserve's Aruoba-Diebold-Scott Business Conditions Index.
The country is being flooded by Illegal Aliens and Syrian "Refugees" from countries we destroyed.
Obama is in France trying to sign away what's left of America's Economic Sovereignty to a bunch of un elected bureaucrats and meanwhile you want us to be happy about a fake jobs report from a "newspaper" that wouldn't know the truth if it hit them square in the face?
I used to subscribe to the WSJ. It's garbage.
No other media outlet is going to say anything different, though. How could they? And bias or not on the part of the WSJ has nothing to do with the ADP report.Because it's from the WSJ. They don't publish much beyond what fits their agenda.
It doesn't matter what I think...there either is or is not. I'm not sure why you think having a mandate for full employment would make any difference for the business conditions index...which parts of it introduce bias?Also, ADP changed their methodology recently:
How good is ADP at forecasting the monthly BLS jobs reports? | Harry J Enten
One of The Federal Reserve's Dual Mandates is Full Employment. You think there would be any bias there? Naw!The ADP, hoping to make its data more accurate, made some major changes for its October 2012 report. That month, the ADP started using ADP payroll data, BLS employment data, and the Philadelphia Federal Reserve's Aruoba-Diebold-Scott Business Conditions Index.
Point out a lie and I'll tell you.Why do so many Americans INSIST on being lied to?
