Progressives call for US to take in some of the expected 1 million Gaza refugees

So no rules to war...

Well for starters forget any allies... They will tell you to fuck off right there...
Also, over half your soldiers will tell you to fuck off too, Supreme Court will probably agree with them too..

Then since US will not have any help from other countries, good luck with who is attacking you and who is paying for it... US will have no access to information outside its borders...

Now Iran look like the good guys to the Rest of the World...

Now US receives sporadic attacks with no one claiming responsibility, dirty bombs , muster gas at a stadium... Actually at all large gatherings... All major sporting events have no crowds, people afraid to go to work..... Then someone poisions the water supply and kills a few hundred thousand people but the water supply is contaminated for years...

Great thinking tough guy... But don't worry, the US army can get into rape and have child soliders... No ROE.....

P.S. You weren't the smartest tool at school, were you...

That is the stupidest thing ever posted on the Internet.

There is plenty of proof of IDF ethnic cleansing areas of Palestinians... Do you dispute that?
Ethnic Cleansing is a war crime... That makes IDF war criminals.

Hamas are war criminals... There actions were and are war crimes...

So I am fully willing to say there are war criminals on both sides and their war crimes need to be condemned...

I have shown how when both sides restore to war crimes then it is innocent people on both sides that die. IDF have no military objective to the present bombing, they know it doesn't really weaken Hamas and actually probably strengthens them. They don't care, it is about vengeance.

BTW, we have posters here that want to perform worse war crimes than the IDF by advocating a full genocide.

The only war crime is losing.
 
Get ready for regular suicide bombings at the local shopping mall.

Palestinians have a well-earned reputation as human locusts.


Why are we the ones that should take them? Why can't they go to Egypt?

Because Egypt does not want them.

Because they don’t want an influx of foreigners any more than you do

And because every country that was dumb enough to let the human locusts in paid for it. They tried to assassinate the king of Jordan, they supported Saddam when Iraq invaded Kuwait, and they started a civil war in Lebanon.

God is doing that because you're wicked and deserve to be "flooded" by "7th century primitives".

Are you on drugs?
 
Palestine has existed for thousands of years, going back to the time of the Egyptians before Christ. The city of Gaza today was the land of the Philistines. The Greek historian Herodotus identified the Holy Land as Philistina. The Romans after defeating the Jewish uprising under Bar Kokhba, identified the Holy Land as Palestine-Syria.

Whatever the people called themselves is irrelevant. Using the word "Palestinian" or not, they were the natives of the land, living there for generations. Genetic tests have even proved that these Palestinian "Arabs" are the natives of the Holy Land. Israeli scientists and rabbis actually admit this:


Are you saying palestians are Philistines?
 
They're not 'foreigners' moron. Gaza was part of Egypt before they lost the '67 War to Israel. Israel tried to give it back and Egypt said, 'No thanks'.

Besides, I'm not sure there's gonna be a whole lot of Gaza types left after Israel gets done killing the FUCK out of them.
It was never clear to me why Egypt was PERMITTED to abandon Gaza------just throw it out like garbage. Imagine
the USA dumping Alabama
 
Are you saying palestians are Philistines?
you would be amazed at what people educated by
CLASSIC COMICS----actually believe. The fact that
HERODOTUS decided to designate lots of land between
ASSYRIA and all the way to the eastern part of SINAI----
PALESTINA circa 500 BCE is actually a nod to the PHILISTINES who were
AEGEAN seafaring people who happened to colonize
uhm a northeast (I think) part of Sinai. They did not
even last long there, --- has created lots of nonsensical thinking. The greeks were VERY ETHCNOCENTRIC
 
Are you saying palestians are Philistines?
I'm saying what I actually said and you're conveniently ignoring. Your claim that the word Palestine has no connection or history to the Holy Land is flat-out wrong. And the fact the natives of the Holy Land who now speak Arabic and are mostly of the Muslim and Christian faiths, identify themselves as "Palestinians" is irrelevant as to whether they have historical and ancestral roots in that land. They do and your American Evangelical, 700 Club, Pastor John Hagee, Zionist claim that they don't is WRONG, if not DEMONIC.

Both Muslim and Christian "Palestinians" are natives of the Holy Land. They're just as likely to have the blood of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, coursing through their veins as any Jew from Poland. If you fail to realize that, that's your problem. It doesn't matter if these people call themselves Palestinians or even Mickey Mouse, they are the natives of the land, just as much as a Jew from Eastern Europe or any other part of the world.
 
for the record----genetic studies reveal that both Jews thruout the world and people who call themselves "palestinians" ---
by POPULATION GENETIC STUDIES reveal that both groups have roots in the LEVANT (the LEVANT IS NOT JUST "palestine" and it is certainly NOT an indication of kinship with Abraham) Ain't idiot propaganda fun?.
 
Palestinians have a well-earned reputation as human locusts.




Because Egypt does not want them.



And because every country that was dumb enough to let the human locusts in paid for it. They tried to assassinate the king of Jordan, they supported Saddam when Iraq invaded Kuwait, and they started a civil war in Lebanon.



Are you on drugs?
America is going to be judged and fractured into several countries. Watch and see the hand of the Lord. Chaos shall rain upon this wicked nation. The cries of children ascend to the Most High, and their blood stains the pulpits of this land. WW3 is coming and America will be reduced to rubble.
 
for the record----genetic studies reveal that both Jews thruout the world and people who call themselves "palestinians" ---
by POPULATION GENETIC STUDIES reveal that both groups have roots in the LEVANT (the LEVANT IS NOT JUST "palestine" and it is certainly NOT an indication of kinship with Abraham) Ain't idiot propaganda fun?.
Isn't your strawman criticism fun? You're just strengthening what I said. Palestinians, are Jews, Muslims, and Christians, of the Holy Land. Whether they speak Arabic or not is irrelevant. These people who are sometimes dismissed as Arabs by Zionist Jews who have no genuine, deep roots in the Holy Land are wrong. These Arabic-speaking Palestinian Muslims and Christians are just as likely to descend from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as any Jew from Poland.
 
Last edited:
America is going to be judged and fractured into several countries. Watch and see the hand of the Lord. Chaos shall rain upon this wicked nation. The cries of children ascend to the Most High, and their blood stains the pulpits of this land. WW3 is coming and America will be reduced to rubble.
You need your medication adjusted, kooky.
 
America is going to be judged and fractured into several countries. Watch and see the hand of the Lord. Chaos shall rain upon this wicked nation. The cries of children ascend to the Most High, and their blood stains the pulpits of this land. WW3 is coming and America will be reduced to rubble.

What a fckn loon
 
I'm saying what I actually said and you're conveniently ignoring. Your claim that the word Palestine has no connection or history to the Holy Land is flat-out wrong. And the fact the natives of the Holy Land who now speak Arabic and are mostly of the Muslim and Christian faiths, identify themselves as "Palestinians" is irrelevant as to whether they have historical and ancestral roots in that land. They do and your American Evangelical, 700 Club, Pastor John Hagee, Zionist claim that they don't is WRONG, if not DEMONIC.

Both Muslim and Christian "Palestinians" are natives of the Holy Land. They're just as likely to have the blood of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, coursing through their veins as any Jew from Poland. If you fail to realize that, that's your problem. It doesn't matter if these people call themselves Palestinians or even Mickey Mouse, they are the natives of the land, just as much as a Jew from Eastern Europe or any other part of the world.
Some think of the Palestinian-Israeli dispute as a clash of nationalisms. Others stress religious antagonism, while others yet see an East-West power struggle. But it is roundly agreed upon that a key element of the conflict is land. That land, for many years by many people, was called Palestine.


Yet few people—including Middle East policy makers, journalists, historians and even lexicographers—know much about the history of the name “Palestine,” or what territory it has at one time or another encompassed.


The ancient Romans pinned the name on the Land of Israel. In 135 CE, after stamping out the province of Judea’s second insurrection, the Romans renamed the province Syria Palaestina—that is, “Palestinian Syria.” They did so resentfully, as a punishment, to obliterate the link between the Jews (in Hebrew, Y’hudim and in Latin Judaei) and the province (the Hebrew name of which was Y’hudah). “Palaestina” referred to the Philistines, whose home base had been on the Mediterranean coast.


It is widely thought, as reflected in my 1976 New College Edition of the American Heritage Dictionary, that the term Palestine refers only to the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. Countless books and maps say that Israel, in conquering the West Bank and Gaza in the 1967 Six-Day War, took control of “all of Palestine.” But that is not correct.


The term “Palestine” was used for millennia without a precise geographic definition. That’s not uncommon—think of “Transcaucasus” or “Midwest.” No precise definition existed for Palestine because none was required. Since the Roman era, the name lacked political significance. No nation ever had that name.
 
America is going to be judged and fractured into several countries. Watch and see the hand of the Lord. Chaos shall rain upon this wicked nation. The cries of children ascend to the Most High, and their blood stains the pulpits of this land. WW3 is coming and America will be reduced to rubble.
Sounds like another American-Hating, Jew-Hating Arab has joined the forum.
 
Some think of the Palestinian-Israeli dispute as a clash of nationalisms. Others stress religious antagonism, while others yet see an East-West power struggle. But it is roundly agreed upon that a key element of the conflict is land. That land, for many years by many people, was called Palestine.


Yet few people—including Middle East policy makers, journalists, historians and even lexicographers—know much about the history of the name “Palestine,” or what territory it has at one time or another encompassed.


The ancient Romans pinned the name on the Land of Israel. In 135 CE, after stamping out the province of Judea’s second insurrection, the Romans renamed the province Syria Palaestina—that is, “Palestinian Syria.” They did so resentfully, as a punishment, to obliterate the link between the Jews (in Hebrew, Y’hudim and in Latin Judaei) and the province (the Hebrew name of which was Y’hudah). “Palaestina” referred to the Philistines, whose home base had been on the Mediterranean coast.


It is widely thought, as reflected in my 1976 New College Edition of the American Heritage Dictionary, that the term Palestine refers only to the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. Countless books and maps say that Israel, in conquering the West Bank and Gaza in the 1967 Six-Day War, took control of “all of Palestine.” But that is not correct.


The term “Palestine” was used for millennia without a precise geographic definition. That’s not uncommon—think of “Transcaucasus” or “Midwest.” No precise definition existed for Palestine because none was required. Since the Roman era, the name lacked political significance. No nation ever had that name.
It doesn't matter. The point is that these people who are now culturally Levantine-Arabs, are the natives of that land. They have every right to live there in the Holy Land, and they're just as likely to be the progeny of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. So the Evangelical, Zionist claim that these "Palestinian A-rabs" don't belong in the Holy Land because supposedly the Jews from Poland, Germany, and Russia are more worthy to take the Holy Land for themselves, is wrong, ethically and biblically.

 
Sounds like another American-Hating, Jew-Hating Arab has joined the forum.


AncientNauticalAmericanavocet-size_restricted.gif
 
It doesn't matter. The point is that these people who are now culturally Levantine-Arabs, are the natives of that land. They have every right to live there in the Holy Land, and they're just as likely to be the progeny of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. So the Evangelical, Zionist claim that these "Palestinian A-rabs" don't belong in the Holy Land because supposedly the Jews from Poland, Germany, and Russia are more worthy to take the Holy Land for themselves, is wrong, ethically and biblically.


The Jews were in Israel 3000 years ago. They migrated to Europe after that (some of them), but their homeland is Israel.

But I get it: you want ALL of the Middle East Judenfree.
 

Forum List

Back
Top