- Thread starter
- #81
Of course he didn’t intend to harm anyone, which is why they have manslaughter charges for negligent behavior. He was the director of the film, and from what I understood, he did not take action to ensure the bullets were blanks. It’s a tragedy, certainly, but he should have been charged with something, imo.I have mulled this over in my mind ever since he was first charged. I have admired Alec Baldwin's talent and, though I have problems with him personally, I own a number of his movies because I see talent as God given.
I dislike Baldwin's personality and I despise his politics that I have seen as mean spirited, dishonest, and unethical.
Evenso I think what happened that day was a tragic accident totally unintended on anybody's part. I do not think Baldwin intended anyone any harm or even thought about it until he pulled that trigger. I can believe he would give pretty much anything to undo the harm that resulted.
Now the decent thing would be for him to pay of any mortgage or other debts the family might have, put Halyna Hutchins' son through college, make whatever restitution he can. He probably won't but that would be the decent thing.
But I honestly can't see how the world would be safer or justice would be served by putting him in prison.
What I’d love to see come out of this is a law that fake guns must be used in movies. I doubt that will happen.
And as far as as his paying off the family’s mortgage or putting the victim’s son through college, he will probably be forced to fork over a lot of money after a civil trial. It would be the right thing for him to pre-empt that by offering a large sum on his own - say $10 million of his $75 million net worth - but I doubt he will do that. He’s not that type of guy.