martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,300
- 34,454
- 2,300
The Proud boys protected the community in Portland and Salem.
The SOBs should be arrested, they attacked people who were posing no threat to them. They're no better than ANTIFA.
.
It was inevitable that as long as the police decide to let one side go full throttle, the other side would end up with people ready to mix it up.
The police can end this by ending any protest that goes riot the SECOND it goes over the line.
People who want no part of the riot are given a chance to leave, and if they don't they get scooped up as part of the remnant staying behind.
That is not as easy as you make it sound. Portland has a relatively small police force with less officers per thousand residents than most cities it's size. Considering that protests have been going on in Portland for over 3 months, with multiple protests often in different locations during the same day, putting large numbers of police monitoring every protests is not possible while still providing police protection for over 600,000 people in the city. It's hard to determine exactly how many protests have occurred in the last 3 months because they often merge but it is safe to say that there have been hundreds and only a small percentage have turned into riots with serious injuries or property damage.
Of the thousands of protest marches in the US with over 26 million participates, 31 people have died, only one was in Portland.
![]()
Protests in Portland, Oregon - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
it doesn't help to play catch and release and refuse to prosecute. And spare me the "most are peaceful" bullshit. Violence is violence, and the bonus is that the violent ones hide behind the non-violent ones (many who know exactly what type of cover they are giving to the rioters) and then claim "It was peaceful"
Sorry, your bullshit doesn't spread here.
In most of the arrests, catch and release is only option because the district attorney's office does not have the staff to handle all the cases or there is serious lack evidence, often both. The most common arrests are for interfering with the police, disorderly conduct and trespassing, all misdemeanors that typical involve no jail time. There have been only a few arrests for property crimes because most the property crimes are committed by only a few people.
The two most important thing to understand about riots and protests in Portland is they are very common and the public tends to be very supportive. The very first protest in Portland occurred only days after the city was founded and the first major riot only 5 years after the founding. Since then protests and riots have occurred far more often than any city it's size. When I lived there a few years ago there was some kind of demonstration or protest almost everyday and some violence was not uncommon and every so often there would riot but no one seem to be very disturbed. In fact, the one most disturbing thing for Portlanders is stopping the protests. Although Portlanders are about evenly divided on demilitarizing the police, they overwhelming supportive the protests. As one person said, It wouldn't be Portland without the demonstrations and occasional riots.
Nothing like excusing anarchy when it suits your interest.
Why aren't you manning the barricades with them, Mr Sans-cullottes?