Psycho Liar Nut Job US Pres. Goes off the Rails in Rampage-Intel Dir. Warns of Fitness for Office

[Soggy in NOLA]

Give me a quote where Trump said anything half as divisive as HIllary's "deplorable" slur.

Or apologize for being a liar.

How about saying there were good people on the KKK and Neo-Nazi side.

Not everyone was a member of the KKK, a neo-Nazi or Antifa.

 

[Correll]

I had to double check it, and the exact words were that there were "very fine people" on the Neo-nazi / KKK side

Don't just check it, post it, in context.

Cause you are lying. And you can't do it.

President Trump defended the white nationalists who protested in Charlottesville on Tuesday, saying they included “some very fine people,” .

Link to the quote or STFU.

“I’ve condemned neo-Nazis. I’ve condemned many different groups. But not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me,” he said.

“You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists,” Trump said. “The press has treated them absolutely unfairly.”

“You also had some very fine people on both sides,” he said.

Trump Defends White-Nationalist Protesters: 'Some Very Fine People on Both Sides'

NEWSFLASH-There are no "very fine" white supremacist or neo Nazis.

He is drawing a clear distinction between neo nazis and white nationalist, whom he condemned, and others that he claims were there.


He is not defending the nazis, he condemned them.


You seem to be upset because you assume that everyone there was a nazi, and thus he defense of "others" is, in your mind a defense of nazis.


But that only makes sense if you ignore the evidence that he disagrees with you on that.


THe most you could show at this point in time, if you published a comprehensive list of everyone that was there,


would be that he was wrong about who was there.


Whoopdee freaking doo.

 

[Correll]

NOthign about being concerned about being ordered to do a nuclear strike.
.

Current international law makes first use of nukes illegal. It's becomes a classic ":I was only following orders" defense being throw out. The military is scarred about what to do if they get an order from Trump.

When Trump promised fire and fury, the likes the world had never seen being waged on North Korea military sphincters tightened.

The US has always kept the use, even the First Use on nuclear weapons on the table.

Anyone that had a problem with that, should have thought about that before they became high ranking military officers.

 

[radical right]

They can't use their welfare ID to vote.

This government issued picture ID is not valid for voting.

/----/
Get a NY non-driver ID card

Who can get a non-driver ID (NDID) card
A person any age can get a non-driver ID card. You must apply at a DMV office 1. We will give you a temporary non-photo document at the DMV office. Allow 2 weeks to receive your photo ID card in the mail.

The non-driver State ID costs $9 to $10 for a 4 to 5 year ID and $13 to $14 for an 8 to 9 year ID. You can pay with cash, check or credit card. Where and when to go: You can go to any of these DMV offices in New York City.

 

[radical right]

The US has always kept the use, even the First Use on nuclear weapons on the table.

Anyone that had a problem with that, should have thought about that before they became high ranking military officers.

They joined the military with a rational commander-in-chief in charge. Trump frightens them, That's not what they signed up for.

 

[Correll]

The US has always kept the use, even the First Use on nuclear weapons on the table.

Anyone that had a problem with that, should have thought about that before they became high ranking military officers.

They joined the military with a rational commander-in-chief in charge. Trump frightens them, That's not what they signed up for.

YOur hysteria is noted. It is not a justification for someone else to be a drama queen.

 

[radical right]

They joined the military with a rational commander-in-chief in charge. Trump frightens them, That's not what they signed up for.

YOur hysteria is noted. It is not a justification for someone else to be a drama queen.

Trump said he knew more about defeating ISIS than the Generals.
Trump said he knew how to win the war in Afghanistan

When asked about his plan, all Trump could do was to ask the Generals, and do the same thing that George W. Bush did.

 

[Correll]

They joined the military with a rational commander-in-chief in charge. Trump frightens them, That's not what they signed up for.

YOur hysteria is noted. It is not a justification for someone else to be a drama queen.

Trump said he knew more about defeating ISIS than the Generals.
Trump said he knew how to win the war in Afghanistan

When asked about his plan, all Trump could do was to ask the Generals, and do the same thing that George W. Bush did.

So, you are hysterical because he talked some smack during the campaign and is settling down now?


Are you under the impression that this is something "new"?

 

[radical right]

So, you are hysterical because he talked some smack during the campaign and is settling down now?

Yup Trump talked smack of making Mexico pay for the wall and has now settled down to making the american taxpayer pay for it.

 

[Correll]

So, you are hysterical because he talked some smack during the campaign and is settling down now?

Yup Trump talked smack of making Mexico pay for the wall and has now settled down to making the american taxpayer pay for it.

So, you're dropping all this military upset angle of bs then?

 

[Correll]

So, you are hysterical because he talked some smack during the campaign and is settling down now?

Yup Trump talked smack of making Mexico pay for the wall and has now settled down to making the american taxpayer pay for it.

I asked you if you supported amnesty for the eleven millions job thieves and wage depressors here while leaving the border open for millions more to come.


You did not answer.


Because the answer is yes.


And the harm that would do to America reveals your concern about money to be complete bullshit.

You never asked me. You're lying

Maybe you missed it. Maybe you are blurring together with some other avatar of the lib hive mind.


But I note you did't answer the question....

 

[Correll]

I asked you if you supported amnesty for the eleven millions job thieves and wage depressors here while leaving the border open for millions more to come.


You did not answer.


Because the answer is yes.


And the harm that would do to America reveals your concern about money to be complete bullshit.

You never asked me. You're lying

Maybe you missed it. Maybe you are blurring together with some other avatar of the lib hive mind.


But I note you did't answer the question....

Post where you asked me. Or as you would say STFU.

I'm asking you now, and you are not answering.

 

[radical right]

Do you want to give Trump his government shutdown?

I think I've been pretty clear about what I want.

Do you want to give amnesty to the over 11 million illegals in this country while leaving the border open for more?

Apologies for missing the question (I had to search for it)

 

[radical right]

I'm asking you now, and you are not answering.

I was busy searching for your question. I didn't pay attention to it, because you didn't answer my question, and instead just asked another question.

 

[Seawytch]

In 1987 Ronald Reagan was my CInC. I was a dedicated sailor.

I served proudly under 2 Republican Presidents, 1 Democrat and George W. Bush. (Relax, joke)

Nobody can be proud when that reality show clown is pretending to be president.

Do you remember how the libs reacted when Reagan said the Soviet Union would end up on the Ash Heap of history?

Do you remember how certain they were about how he was stupid and reckless and dangerous?


DO you remember how dishonest they were when history proved Reagan Right and them WRONG?



Why should I think this time is any different?

Then you should be able to provide links to all the "libs" that laughed at Reagan.

It's not just "libs" that think Trump is unhinged, an embarrassment and should not be trusted with the Nuclear codes...it's the world.

If you are really doubting the bti about them laughing at him, I'm sure I can dig up some examples, though it might be hard to find a lot since this predates the internet and is not they type of thing a lot of people want to document.




And yes, it is just libs.


That the rest of the world is dominated by libs, is to their shame, but it is still just libs, and any fools silly enough to listen to them.






12/25/91: Reagan, the Soviets, & the Ash-Heap of History - Providence



"Almost no one saw it coming. Conventional liberal wisdom was that the United States and the Soviet Union had equally flawed political systems. They must work to “converge” and compromise for the sake of world peace. “Each superpower has economic troubles,” announced historian Arthur Schlesinger after a 1982 trip to Moscow. “Neither is on the ropes.” MIT economist Lester Thurow called it “a vulgar mistake to think that most people in Eastern Europe are miserable.” The intelligentsia concluded that Reagan’s prediction of Soviet decline was pure fantasy. Columbia University’s Seweryn Bialer insisted in 1982 that “the Soviet Union is not now nor will be during the next decade in the throes of a true system crisis, for it boasts enormous unused reserves of political and social stability that suffice to endure the deepest difficulties.”

After Reagan’s Westminster speech, historian Robert F. Byrnes collected essays from thirty-five experts on the Soviet Union—the cream of American academia—in a book titled After Brezhnev. Their conclusion: any thought of winning the Cold War was a pipe dream. “The Soviet Union is going to remain a stable state, with a very stable, conservative, immobile government,” Byrnes said in an interview. “We don’t see any collapse or weakening of the Soviet system.” As late as 1984, Harvard’s John Kenneth Galbraith echoed the mood of moral equivalency. “The Russian system succeeds because, in contrast to the Western industrial economies, it makes full use of its manpower.”

Well, now. Rarely in the field of human prognostication have so many self-appointed experts been so wrong about so much. It turns out that Ronald Reagan was not the naïve, warmongering ideologue of liberal imagination. Instead, the American president—who believed deeply in American exceptionalism—developed a coherent and plausible strategy to actually defeat the Soviet Union. Lou Cannon, the Washington Postreporter who covered the Reagan administration, later admitted: “the Westminster speech stands the test of time as the most farsighted and encompassing of Reagan’s anti-communist messages.” "

Where was the "lib" laughing you claimed? You claimed "libs" laughed at Reagan. Where?

"Conventional liberal wisdom"

"historian Arthur Schlesinger"

"Columbia University’s Seweryn Bialer"


"thirty-five experts on the Soviet Union—the cream of American academia"


"John Kenneth Galbrait"

And still no "lib laughing". Thanks for reiterating that.

And Trump is still an unhinged clown likely suffering from Dementia.

 

[Seawytch]

So, you're dropping that whole, ran on dividing US thing? Just like that?

Thanks for the reminder. Trump has been a divider, pitting right against left, the people against the media, even the GOP against the GOP.

Trump hasn't even mentioned bipartisan. He's droped down to his core supporters, which include nazi's, racists and the rest of the deplorables.

Trumps support is a narrow band of the narrow minded. Who can't even understand Bannons plan to pit neighbor against neighbor, because division helps Trump.

Give me a quote where Trump said anything half as divisive as HIllary's "deplorable" slur.

Or apologize for being a liar.

1. Mocking a disabled reporter
2. Calling every political opponent some childish 3rd grade name
3. Calling for a Muslim ban
4. Calling Mexicans rapists and drug dealers
5. Everything out of his foul mouth at one of his "rallies"

All of these are more divisive than calling racists, xenophobes and homophobes "deplorable". Those things ARE deplorable.

1. Attacking a reporter might divide reporters, a very small group, from the rest of America. Nothing compared to the "deplorable" attack.

2. Attacking politicians is not turning Americas against each other. Politicians are players who entered the game knowing it is hard ball.

3. Foreign muslims are by definition NOT Americans. The issue was to protect all Americans and advance their interests at the expense of outsiders. This is not a divisive move.

4. Illegals are not Americans either and his immigration policy was/is designed to advance American interest's at the expense of outsiders. This is not a divisive move.

5. HIllary on the other hand, tried to panic monger her base into a fear that that other half of America was out to get them.
There was even hysterical references to Nazis and nuclear war.

Hillary called out homophobes, xenopobes and racists. That's truth not divisiveness. You obviously don't find those things deplorable.

 

[Rambunctious]

Well he sure shut Kim Un up...something Obama and Clinton and Bush couldn't do.....got to credit him for that. The economy is on fire...credit for that.

 

[radical right]

Shut down the government - Donald J. Trump

Give him what he wants and BUILD THE WALL!

Do you want to give Trump his government shutdown?

I think I've been pretty clear about what I want.

Do you want Trump to shut down the government or not?

That's the question I left you with, and where you snuck in a question instead of an answer:

Do you want to give amnesty to the over 11 million illegals in this country while leaving the border open for more?

So i'll answer that NO!

Amnesty to illegals is only something Ronald Reagan would do.

 

[Rambunctious]

Do you want Trump to shut down the government or not?

Yes.....why not? something has to give, someone has to flinch. The swamp must be defeated.

 

[Cellblock2429]

They joined the military with a rational commander-in-chief in charge. Trump frightens them, That's not what they signed up for.

YOur hysteria is noted. It is not a justification for someone else to be a drama queen.

Trump said he knew more about defeating ISIS than the Generals.
Trump said he knew how to win the war in Afghanistan

When asked about his plan, all Trump could do was to ask the Generals, and do the same thing that George W. Bush did.

/----/ Didn't Candidate Obozo promise to lower the sea levels?