BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
- Nov 11, 2021
- 46,360
- 45,267
Technically true. But we all know what was meant.A new trial?
He never went to trial, the Shaman plead guilty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Technically true. But we all know what was meant.A new trial?
He never went to trial, the Shaman plead guilty.
You didn't answer the question...
He was convicted because he was illegally inside the Capitol. How is more video of him being inside the Capitol, exculpatory?
He should definitely try to use that 4 minutes of video and take it to trial.....those 4 minutes easily overturn the other 39,996 minutes of video........
He should take it to trial and hire the best lawyer his Go-Fund me account can provide....will you please donate?
He might have pled down to something even lower.
LOL
You ignorantly claimed he pled to a lesser crime. He didn't. He pleaded guilty to the crime he was captured committing on video.
And now you're actually trying to argue that MORE video of him committing that crime could be exculpatory.
![]()
According to faun 6 charges, pled to one. This just keeps making my point more and more.
The whole point of total discovery allowed to the defense is to allow them all the information needed BEFORE even pleading out to something.
LOLOL
You said he did plead down. Now you tacitly confess you're ignorant by tailoring your position to maybe he would have pleaded down.
Moron, he pled guilty to the charge where he was caught on video committing.
Which they can now prove he didn't do..... Damn, this thing is coming back to bit you in the ass hard...
None of those 6 charges involve violence, which you would know if you weren’t such a moron.According to faun 6 charges, pled to one. This just keeps making my point more and more.
The whole point of total discovery allowed to the defense is to allow them all the information needed BEFORE even pleading out to something.
probably involving circumstances of violent behavior
He pled to it, which isn't the same as being guilty of doing that exact thing.
I pled to a speeding ticket and they lowered it to parking in front of a fire hydrant.
They were aware that he was friendly with officers, but he didn’t comply with their commands.By being threatened by 5 other charges.
The videos of him being friendly with the officers in question should have been part of the information the defense had.
It would have changed the balance of power in the plea negotiations at a minimum.
None of those 6 charges involve violence, which you would know if you weren’t such a moron.
But you didn’t know that so you look like a moron.
How the fuck would more video of him being inside the Capitol do that??
They were aware that he was friendly with officers, but he didn’t comply with their commands.
So figure it out before you start running your mouth.Again, we don't know what else he was threatened with if he went to trial.
Why would there have even been plea negotiations....once they see the 4 minutes of video....they wouldn't have even brought charges...in fact, they may have indicted Nancy Pelosi for framing all of the patriots on Jan 6th...this story is huge......will you please donate now?It would have changed the balance of power in the plea negotiations at a minimum.
Was it the lesser of the crimes he was charged with? Do we know what he was threatened with during plea negotiations?
You said he was charged with 6, yet plead to one.
Do you even know how plea bargaining works?
You just keep helping my case, not hurting it.
The officer who followed him into the Senate floor is in video asking him to leave, but he didn’t.What commands?
Again, none of this went to trial, so there is no testimony.