Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty hard to prove, though, isn't it?
If he was certain at the time, that's not a lie.
How many Quotes do you want that are words from his own mouth that states the CERTAINLY of WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION as an IMMINENT THREAT, allie?
For real.. You might as well insist that Strom Thurman was only working with available knowledge when fillibustering civil rights legislation.
Once again, claiming absolute certainty, and then being proven wrong is not perpetuating a lie. I can be absolutely certain it's going to be cold today. If it isn't, was I lying?
And you know he knew...how?
And it still isn't a lie to be incorrect about something. Unless you know you're incorrect and make the claim anyway.
And you know he knew...how?
And it still isn't a lie to be incorrect about something. Unless you know you're incorrect and make the claim anyway.
Just one would do, where he claimed absolute certainty. Which, by the way, we didnt need to justify our taking out Saddam.
I think you may have misconstrued some of the more famous quotes, like
"Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price. " as to what that means, and also:
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."
I suppose one could construe the statement above as saying "with absolute certainty" was implied, but no where does it say "with absolute certainty"
And AGAIN...the concept that there was no doubt was a misconception.
Not a lie.
Are you this dense?
Just one would do, where he claimed absolute certainty. Which, by the way, we didnt need to justify our taking out Saddam.
I think you may have misconstrued some of the more famous quotes, like
"Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price. " as to what that means, and also:
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."
I suppose one could construe the statement above as saying "with absolute certainty" was implied, but no where does it say "with absolute certainty"
yea.. because claiming that Saddam had WMDs and was an actual threat WASNT A LIE!
fuckoff, dickwad, unless you have something to add.
And yet none of what he said was a lie, imagine that.