Question

[TNHarley]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

 

[jc456]

The IRONY Projectionists again.

 

[Hossfly]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

That's perfectly legal as long as you don't cock your thumb and point your finger at your opponent. That would be attempted murder.

 

[SAYIT]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

More importantly, Biden lied to make his point and he is at least a material witness and perhaps a co-conspirator in the quid pro quo that occured on his watch.

 

[toobfreak]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

No and yes.

NO, it should NOT be considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates! Indeed, anyone running for the highest office in the land ought to be subjected to AT LEAST as much scrutiny as applying for a job at Kinko's! It should not be up to a sheriff in Arizona to uncover that you are NOT natural born AFTER being elected, much less up to someone else to discover you were using your government office to get your son gravy jobs in the Ukraine. The very fact that people run for and get elected as president without no one apparently doing any sort of official, independent, qualifying background check on these people is in itself PROOF THAT THE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT and all about the money.

YES, it IS trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition. It is NOT Joe's place to be calling for the removal from office his main opponent when Joe hasn't a SHRED of evidence as to the criminality or otherwise of Trump. And even if he did (which he doesn't), it's not his place to be worrying about that. If HE KNOWS Trump ought to be impeached, then WHERE IS THE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING BY THOSE WHOSE JOB IT IS TO IMPEACH?

We already live in a Venezuelan banana republic, just that no one is yet willing to admit it.

 

[Toro]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

No.

 

[Cellblock2429]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

/——/ Trump didn’t do any of that. It’s all Adam Shytface’s lies and distortions.

 

[TNHarley]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

No and yes.

NO, it should NOT be considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates! Indeed, anyone running for the highest office in the land ought to be subjected to AT LEAST as much scrutiny as applying for a job at Kinko's! It should not be up to a sheriff in Arizona to uncover that you are NOT natural born AFTER being elected, much less up to someone else to discover you were using your government office to get your son gravy jobs in the Ukraine. The very fact that people run for and get elected as president without no one apparently doing any sort of official, independent, qualifying background check on these people is in itself PROOF THAT THE SYSTEM IS CORRUPT and all about the money.

YES, it IS trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition. It is NOT Joe's place to be calling for the removal from office his main opponent when Joe hasn't a SHRED of evidence as to the criminality or otherwise of Trump. And even if he did (which he doesn't), it's not his place to be worrying about that. If HE KNOWS Trump ought to be impeached, then WHERE IS THE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDING BY THOSE WHOSE JOB IT IS TO IMPEACH?

We already live in a Venezuelan banana republic, just that no one is yet willing to admit it.

Just thought it would be funny lol

 

[G.T.]

Influencing the election domestically is what you're SUPPOSED to do... Call that shit a campaign, or something weird like that.

Doing it using foreign Governments is what you're NOT supposed to do. Call it foreign interference, or something weird like that.

 

[RDD_1210]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

It's mind boggling that it somehow it escapes you that what Trump has done and continues to do is completely wrong.

Or maybe it doesn't escape you and you just don't care.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Influencing the election domestically is what you're SUPPOSED to do... Call that shit a campaign, or something weird like that.

Doing it using foreign Governments is what you're NOT supposed to do. Call it foreign interference, or something weird like that.

/——-/ Good thing Trump didn’t do that, but democRATS interfere with domestic elections according to s leading democRAT:
Gabbard threatens to boycott Ohio debate, claims DNC is 'rigging' primaries
Gabbard threatens to boycott Ohio debate, claims DNC is 'rigging' primaries


Gabbard threatens to boycott Ohio debate, claims DNC is 'rigging' primaries

 

[Cellblock2429]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

It's mind boggling that it somehow it escapes you that what Trump has done and continues to do is completely wrong.

Or maybe it doesn't escape you and you just don't care.

/——/ Trump is keeping his campaign promises, and that’s something democRATs can’t let stand. BTW, UE claims down by 10,000

 

[G.T.]

Influencing the election domestically is what you're SUPPOSED to do... Call that shit a campaign, or something weird like that.

Doing it using foreign Governments is what you're NOT supposed to do. Call it foreign interference, or something weird like that.

/——-/ Good thing Trump didn’t do that, but democRATS interfere with domestic elections according to s leading democRAT:
Gabbard threatens to boycott Ohio debate, claims DNC is 'rigging' primaries
Gabbard threatens to boycott Ohio debate, claims DNC is 'rigging' primaries


Gabbard threatens to boycott Ohio debate, claims DNC is 'rigging' primaries

It IS a good thing if he didnt do it!

 

[Cellblock2429]

Influencing the election domestically is what you're SUPPOSED to do... Call that shit a campaign, or something weird like that.

Doing it using foreign Governments is what you're NOT supposed to do. Call it foreign interference, or something weird like that.

/——-/ Good thing Trump didn’t do that, but democRATS interfere with domestic elections according to s leading democRAT:
Gabbard threatens to boycott Ohio debate, claims DNC is 'rigging' primaries
Gabbard threatens to boycott Ohio debate, claims DNC is 'rigging' primaries


Gabbard threatens to boycott Ohio debate, claims DNC is 'rigging' primaries

It IS a good thing if he didnt do it!

/——-/ no proof that he did.

 

[RDD_1210]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

It's mind boggling that it somehow it escapes you that what Trump has done and continues to do is completely wrong.

Or maybe it doesn't escape you and you just don't care.

/——/ Trump is keeping his campaign promises, and that’s something democRATs cans let stand. BTW, UE claims down by 10,000

What does that have to do with the topic? Nothing.

 

[Cellblock2429]

If it's considered influencing an election by trying to investigate possible presidential candidates, is it also trying to influence an election when you call for impeachment of the sitting president who will be your competition?

It's mind boggling that it somehow it escapes you that what Trump has done and continues to do is completely wrong.

Or maybe it doesn't escape you and you just don't care.

/——/ Trump is keeping his campaign promises, and that’s something democRATs cans let stand. BTW, UE claims down by 10,000

What does that have to do with the topic? Nothing.

/——-/ I’m responding directly to this comment:
“It's mind boggling that it somehow it escapes you that what Trump has done and continues to do is completely wrong.” What he is doing is keeping his campaign promises.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

 

[HappyJoy]

Um, no.