Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Around 4.4 Billion years ago cells started to develop and split - due to asexual reproduction. Around 4.4 billion years later Homo-Sapiens evolved (evolution from a cell)Evolution is simply impossible....it's like saying the code for running the USMB Board was just a series of random accidents and that is FAR LESS complicated than even a virus.
Around 4.4 Billion years ago cells started to develop and split - due to asexual reproduction. Around 4.4 billion years later Homo-Sapiens evolved (evolution from a cell)
Some 500,000 years later a neolithic fellow counted his fingers and therefore set the basis for mathematics. 30,000 years later a guy developed BASIC and Bill Gates became very rich.
Bill Gates wealth therefore originates from a cell splitting some 4.4 Billion years ago.
All well and good but if life forms existed for billions of years without sex organs and the need for sexual reproduction then it makes no sense to evolve sexual organs as a means for survival.
No, he and many others invest billions into AI - if one day workable, which is far more complex then a cell dividing and mutating into other cells and then forming new lifeforms, due to e.g. environmental circumstances.If Bill Gates had any idea how much more complex a cell was that any Windows operating system, he'd call evolution BS
No, he and many others invest billions into AI - if one day workable, which is far more complex then a cell dividing and mutating into other cells and then forming new lifeforms, due to e.g. environmental circumstances.
Cells are very primitive life forms - originating form e.g. a Lightning strike some 4.4 billion years ago.
It's the continued evolution of cells within 4.4 billion years that seems complex, but isn't at all.
Lightning may have provided the spark needed for life to begin.Electric sparks can generate amino acids and sugars from an atmosphere loaded with water, methane, ammonia and hydrogen, as was shown in the famous Miller-Urey experiment in 1952,
You don't understand the difference between an existing CELL and it's further evolution via cell division, (which isn't complex) and the initial creation of a Cell (which off course is complex as hell) due to it's own evolution.You have absolutory no idea what you are talking about.
Again ... no legitimate answers to the simple questions.
You don't understand the difference between an existing CELL and it's further evolution via cell division, (which isn't complex) and the initial creation of a Cell (which off course is complex as hell) due to it's own evolution.
To kick off the creation of a primitive cell - a lightning strike may be sufficient, it's ongoing development is the "mystery"
You don't understand the difference between an existing CELL and it's further evolution via cell division, (which isn't complex) and the initial creation of a Cell (which off course is complex as hell) due to it's own evolution.
To kick off the creation of a primitive cell - a lightning strike may be sufficient, it's ongoing development is the "mystery"
That won't help. The more I study evolution the less plausible it becomes. Too many giant leaps in chains of biological changes that would require hundreds if not more small changes at the molecular and even the atomic level.You don't have enough education for this conversation.
Pretty much.Science is great at describing that things evolved.
How they evolved, not so much.
View attachment 830053
Cells are very primitive life forms - originating form e.g. a Lightning strike some 4.4 billion years ago.
It's the continued evolution of cells within 4.4 billion years that seems complex, but isn't at all.
Lightning may have provided the spark needed for life to begin.Electric sparks can generate amino acids and sugars from an atmosphere loaded with water, methane, ammonia and hydrogen, as was shown in the famous Miller-Urey experiment in 1952,
The simplest of organisms grew by cell cloning. That advanced into some of those organisms implanting DNA into other organisms, which is considered the earliest form of "sex".
This advanced into organisms that are believed to have been more successful by DNA implanting than cloning... a monumental advancement in life. That then advanced into more organized organisms where some specialized in being implanted, and others to implant. We know those organisms existed. We just don't know how they got from cloning to implanting DNA, we just know it occurred.
And - interestingly enough - that is exactly what humans do. Males implant specialized organisms that carry DNA into the female, who has her own specialized organism - an egg - that has her own DNA in it - and whalaaah!! Biology!
A lightning strike, you think a lightning strike make things work better? Please don't believe it just because someone says it's so
You are obviously a denier towards the principals of evolution.A lightning strike, you think a lightning strike make things work better? Please don't believe it just because someone says it's so
That is why I mentioned "if workable" one dayI'll leave off AI ... canshehe create stories? ... write quality poetry? ... or doesshehe just "paint a Starry Night again" ... sure, AI can find that Joni Mitchell quote, but can AI say why Joni said it? ...
You are obviously a denier towards the principals of evolution.
Evolution in any life-form starts of with a primitive specimen. For a cell it's primitive form is the primary cell or stem-cell, that then due to in-numerous chemical processes evolves, including it's organic molecules (evolution) into a complex cell. Namely those cells known to us nowadays. Cells come from preexisting cells. This evolution took millions - hundreds of millions - billions of years.
Viruses and their RNA evolved around 3.8 billion years ago. And a virus needs a cell.
It would be an illusion to define as to what an initial cell looked like - but we can envision the properties that such an initial cell beheld.
Since this complex cell evolution hasn't been fully researched, neither the factor of a virus (maybe only existing a billion years ago) impacting the regulation process of a cell - religious protagonists come up with - you see, you can't document the evolution of a cell - therefore it must have been GOD, who snapped his fingers and created a complex cell as we know of it today.
Just as stating: you can't document the evolution of a Human, so God must have created him.
Sure. DNA and RNA just randomly evolved.
Sure.
What possessed DNA to "evolve" in the first place?
If these are all random, then winning and losing are all equal...there's nothing to be gained from molecules to evolve to proteins, amino acids and a fully functioning cell in evolving. "At this point, what difference does it make?"
Sure.
It's all random.
If you randomly throw a bowling ball in any given direction, the vast majority of which are not even down the lane, what are the odds of bowling a perfect game?
It's all random
If you randomly throw a bowling ball in any given direction, the vast majority of which are not even down the lane, what are the odds of bowling a perfect game?
