Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well now your entire thought process is blowed up sir. thanks for playing. and, the way you handled this just proves how racist you really are. You hate white people and are probably white. The worse kind.Not if its for the same reasons WHITES hate BUSH...THINK!you can't, because didn't blacks also hate Bush, isn't that then racist?It is not as absurd as an objective analysis might reveal. Why did White people turn against Bush and, as YOU say, start to hate him? Do I need to spell it out?Only in the mind of a dishonest, delusion mind like yours.Bush, as in the last year hatred you libs had for him is obviously relevant to the Op which claims that this last year "hate" the RW has for Obama must be because of racism. That you refuse to admit that, is just an example of your intellectual dishonesty. Libs. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
No, the connection is obvious to anyone who is not willfully blind.
The OP states that the RW "hatred" of Obama, unabated even in his last year, must be because of racism.
Yet white liberals were just as hateful, if not more so, of White Bush, in his last year, despite being of the same race.
For you to deny the relevance is absurd.
Now compare those reasons for why the right HATED Obama even before he wiped Bushes fingerprints off the Oval Office phone?
You just proved you're an imbecile. The Constitution gives only Congress the authority to make law, not the president. He has no authority to impose any laws on American citizens, period. Only true numskulls don't know that.
oh you're not going to like this one:You just proved you're an imbecile. The Constitution gives only Congress the authority to make law, not the president. He has no authority to impose any laws on American citizens, period. Only true numskulls don't know that.
The most controversial of President Bush's Executive Orders was the one (a secret one, no less) where he authorized the NSA to eavesdrop on phone calls made by US citizens WITHOUT A WARRANT.
Now, ask yourself this.......Did Bush have....without asking for congressional approval...have the authority to do this?
It is not as absurd as an objective analysis might reveal. Why did White people turn against Bush and, as YOU say, start to hate him? Do I need to spell it out?Only in the mind of a dishonest, delusion mind like yours.Bush, as in the last year hatred you libs had for him is obviously relevant to the Op which claims that this last year "hate" the RW has for Obama must be because of racism. That you refuse to admit that, is just an example of your intellectual dishonesty. Libs. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.And the hatred emerges yet again, led by Correll.
The far rw is now talking about Bush when for years they have been not trying to talk about Bush?
No, the connection is obvious to anyone who is not willfully blind.
The OP states that the RW "hatred" of Obama, unabated even in his last year, must be because of racism.
Yet white liberals were just as hateful, if not more so, of White Bush, in his last year, despite being of the same race.
For you to deny the relevance is absurd.
Now compare those reasons for why the right HATED Obama even before he wiped Bushes fingerprints off the Oval Office phone?
White liberals hated Bush before he even took office.
White liberals hated Bush in his last year.
The RIght hated Obama before he took office.
The Right hated Obama in his last year.
And considering the wide ideological and partisan divide in this country, why would anyone expect any different?
Your "reasons" are just a thin veiled excuse for you to demonize your enemies.
In November 2016...
1. Republicans will keep the House
2. Republicans will keep the Senate
3. Republicans may take the White House
If (3) materializes, Congress won't need a veto-proof majority, to dump the ACA....
Because there'll be no veto to impede such legislation...
well I'll say you failed. Ok?Correll continues to fail with the OP.
ten million out of 300 million what is that percentage? hmmmm..In November 2016...
1. Republicans will keep the House
2. Republicans will keep the Senate
3. Republicans may take the White House
If (3) materializes, Congress won't need a veto-proof majority, to dump the ACA....
Because there'll be no veto to impede such legislation...
Besides the fantasy of the above (check out, for example, how many seats will have to be defended by republicans in the senate).......There are over TEN MILLION people who have signed on to the ACA....take a guess as to how well repealing the ACA will go.
oh you're not going to like this one:
Obama's new FBI chief approved Bush's NSA warrantless wiretapping scheme | Glenn Greenwald
"How are Obama's most devoted media loyalists reacting to the news that he is about to put in charge of the FBI the Bush lawyer who authorized the illegal NSA warrantless eavesdropping program based on warped right-wing legal theories? Exactly as you would expect."
and Obummer didn't get rid of it.oh you're not going to like this one:
Obama's new FBI chief approved Bush's NSA warrantless wiretapping scheme | Glenn Greenwald
"How are Obama's most devoted media loyalists reacting to the news that he is about to put in charge of the FBI the Bush lawyer who authorized the illegal NSA warrantless eavesdropping program based on warped right-wing legal theories? Exactly as you would expect."
This is so damn stupid....The question was asked if executive orders WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL should be law......Your moronic response is that some non-judge declared it to be OK.
ten million out of 300 million what is that percentage? hmmmm..
If the Republicans do repeal the ACA, they had better have a damn good replacement for it. You forgot item .4In November 2016...And as you indicate the 50 plus times they have done it. ignoring the midterm wins by the right. Those people did speak. Perhaps meeting a compromise rather than just veto.
You may (or perhaps, not) have heard the republican 2010 and 2014 mantra that the ACA would be repealed and REPLACED.......Did this last bill by the republicans REPLACE ANYTHING?
1. Republicans will keep the House
2. Republicans will keep the Senate
3. Republicans may take the White House
If (3) materializes, Congress won't need a veto-proof majority, to dump the ACA....
Because there'll be no veto to impede such legislation...
Correll continues to fail with the OP.
again, I'll raise you and say you hate whites more.Correll loves him sum hate.
that was what they wanted to do, there are actually good ideas in it and really bad ones. the mandate for instance, many young people would prefer not to be mandated into an insurance policy.If the Republicans do repeal the ACA, they had better have a damn good replacement for it. You forgot item .4In November 2016...And as you indicate the 50 plus times they have done it. ignoring the midterm wins by the right. Those people did speak. Perhaps meeting a compromise rather than just veto.
You may (or perhaps, not) have heard the republican 2010 and 2014 mantra that the ACA would be repealed and REPLACED.......Did this last bill by the republicans REPLACE ANYTHING?
1. Republicans will keep the House
2. Republicans will keep the Senate
3. Republicans may take the White House
If (3) materializes, Congress won't need a veto-proof majority, to dump the ACA....
Because there'll be no veto to impede such legislation...
The voting public may have something to say about such inclinations to repeal Obamacare with their votes.
It is not as absurd as an objective analysis might reveal. Why did White people turn against Bush and, as YOU say, start to hate him? Do I need to spell it out?Only in the mind of a dishonest, delusion mind like yours.Bush, as in the last year hatred you libs had for him is obviously relevant to the Op which claims that this last year "hate" the RW has for Obama must be because of racism. That you refuse to admit that, is just an example of your intellectual dishonesty. Libs. All the intellectual honesty of a crack whore.
No, the connection is obvious to anyone who is not willfully blind.
The OP states that the RW "hatred" of Obama, unabated even in his last year, must be because of racism.
Yet white liberals were just as hateful, if not more so, of White Bush, in his last year, despite being of the same race.
For you to deny the relevance is absurd.
Now compare those reasons for why the right HATED Obama even before he wiped Bushes fingerprints off the Oval Office phone?
White liberals hated Bush before he even took office.
White liberals hated Bush in his last year.
The RIght hated Obama before he took office.
The Right hated Obama in his last year.
And considering the wide ideological and partisan divide in this country, why would anyone expect any different?
Your "reasons" are just a thin veiled excuse for you to demonize your enemies.
Republican do not need MY help to be demonized. BTW, you overuse that liberal tag. Obviously if most people were really divided into two camps of liberalism and conservatism, there would only be one party forever in power. Stop making things up with this "hate" game that really cannot be defined ss liberal or conservative.
The most rabidly anti-Obama posters are the same posters that were rabidly anti-Bill Clinton, and are now also rabidly anti-HIllary Clinton.
Sadly, I fear the latter...just morons.ten million out of 300 million what is that percentage? hmmmm..
Again, a half-brained response...First, those 10 million people have families; second, ask any candidate on the republican side if they want to piss off 10 million families.
(these right wingers are either here to be slapped around, or just morons.)
except him. The hate he spews is the worst kind.Correll continues to fail with the OP.
I continue to demonstrate that the OP is complete nonsense.
The most rabidly anti-Obama posters are the same posters that were rabidly anti-Bill Clinton, and are now also rabidly anti-HIllary Clinton.
Your pathetic need to make this about Race is just you being intellectually too immature to understand that people can disagree with you without being stupid or evul.
