Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
funny, just like after seven plus years our party doesn't think our government did anything for anyone except promote violence among the flock. Split the country up, divide the parties further. promote racism, get four americans in Benghazi killed, pay a ransom to Iran, etc, etc, etc.Correll's cognitive dissonance is up front.
He admits racism exists in the Far but dismiss it.
He admits that "am a Far Right Ideologue. As are many of my friends."
Obama's race is important to many of the Far Right, and to suggest otherwise only hinders the discussion.
Most Americans dismiss the ideology of the Far Right because they disagree with the principles.
Another false statement "that anyone who disagrees with the black liberal President is doing so because of race" follows. I don't believe that. Most of my colleagues in the party's mainstream don't believe that.
What we do believe is the Far Right, the Tea Party movement, etc., do not have the answers for our government and our society.
you know what they say about glass houses right?The food fight between the old wing and the modern wing began with the Dixiecrat rebellion against Truman in 1948. The conservative far right got their ass kicked at the convention, the Republicans happily jumped in. The partisanship subsided somewhat until the CR movement and Martin Luther King Jr terrified and enraged the southern racists and far right conservatives. When JFK got on board with announcement a New CR needed to be passed, the rage increased. Goldwater's defeat, Vietnam, the murders of King and RFK and others kept the pot boiling. When Nixon was elected, the left went bananas, and it has been all down hill since.
How many "what": racists on the right? on the left? I don't know. A lot is my best guess. When you deny that racism exists on the far right, you become a racist by adoption.
But you detest the far right. It is very useful for you to believe that the far right is full of racists.
And your bias showed very strongly in your huge leap of assuming that me asking "how many" was some type of admission of "many".to
I am a Far Right Ideologue. As are many of my friends.
Obama's race is irrelevant to us.
And it fucking pisses us off to have are serious ideological and partisan concerns dismissed by assholes who say that our real concern is skin color.
If you want to start lessening the partisan rancor, Jake, the first thing to do is to stop that.
YOu don't have to agree with ANYTHING we say or stand for.
Just stop assuming that anyone who disagrees with the black liberal President is doing so because of race.
Again, the condescending nature of a libturd only allows them the right to point a finger and call out racist. in their fantasy land they get to write their own rules and the rules for debate on an internet forum, ask them. I'm sure they'll tell you.
they have nothing worth a shit or factual in any way shape or form and yet they will post up nonsense on top of nonsense.
Correll's cognitive dissonance is up front.
He admits racism exists in the Far but dismiss it.
He admits that "am a Far Right Ideologue. As are many of my friends."
Obama's race is important to many of the Far Right, and to suggest otherwise only hinders the discussion.
Most Americans dismiss the ideology of the Far Right because they disagree with the principles.
Another false statement "that anyone who disagrees with the black liberal President is doing so because of race" follows. I don't believe that. Most of my colleagues in the party's mainstream don't believe that.
What we do believe is the Far Right, the Tea Party movement, etc., do not have the answers for our government and our society.
Correll, I know you dismiss racism as a motivating factor on the Far Right, and I believe you are very wrong.
Start a thread on ideology and principles. And we will watch the far right racialist flood in and blow it up.
I am a very reasonable judge because, unlike you, I will weigh objective facts fairly.
I do think that if you post a Thread in SDZ stating that racists from right and left and middle are not permitted to post we will have a good discussion.
Your last paragraph really describes you, so let's set it aside and you begin a SDZ thread.
I will support you about no race in the discussion.
That is exactly what you did: you made a fallacy of proof by assertion. You admitted that racists exist on your side. Your opinion and evaluation are not proof. Now agree to post a thread in SDZ, and we will find out.I am a very reasonable judge because, unlike you, I will weigh objective facts fairly.
I do think that if you post a Thread in SDZ stating that racists from right and left and middle are not permitted to post we will have a good discussion.
Your last paragraph really describes you, so let's set it aside and you begin a SDZ thread.
I will support you about no race in the discussion.
I have pointed out that your behavior is not that of a reasonable judge.
Simply asserting that you are, without addressing the example of your behavior I cited is a Logical Fallacy of Proof by Assertion.
That is exactly what you did: you made a fallacy of proof by assertion. You admitted that racists exist on your side. Your opinion and evaluation are not proof.I am a very reasonable judge because, unlike you, I will weigh objective facts fairly.
I do think that if you post a Thread in SDZ stating that racists from right and left and middle are not permitted to post we will have a good discussion.
Your last paragraph really describes you, so let's set it aside and you begin a SDZ thread.
I will support you about no race in the discussion.
I have pointed out that your behavior is not that of a reasonable judge.
Simply asserting that you are, without addressing the example of your behavior I cited is a Logical Fallacy of Proof by Assertion.
Come on, get real.One may agree or disagree with Obama's policies; however, Obama has done many things as compared to the republican-led congress that has done virtually NOTHING.
Objectively, then, one would say about the GOP-led congress that they are either:
Incompetent
Complicit with Obama
Lazy
Sacred of the lobbyists
or.........afraid that if they do something that actually benefits the general welfare, the mulatto president will get the credit.....so they instead sit on their fat arses and bitch form the sidelines.
When did Duke run for president, a hundred years ago?
No, you have not.
You are describing yourself and projecting onto me your problems.
we've needed help since 2008, and it is coming in a dude named Trump. finally!!! someone with some sense.I'm a moderate liberal. I voted for HW Bush in 1988. I think both Eisenhower and Nixon were great presidents.
Here is what scares. Voters on the right are not given this kind of latitude by their party. Carter deregulated transportation and communications, and Clinton made larger cuts to welfare than Reagan or Bush. Voters on the right (who understood policy) should give these Democrats credit. Problem is: today's rightwing voter is less concerned with policy. They are conditioned to believe the Democrats are evil regardless of their policies. In fact, today's rightwing voter doesn't know that Reagan tripled Carter's debt. Today's rightwing voter isn't a policy thinker. They can't compare and contrast what each president actually did. They hate the Left unconditionally. This kind of political illiteracy is dangerous, and it speaks to why Trump's popularity is highest amongst non-college educated voters.
God help us.
I'm a moderate liberal. I voted for HW Bush in 1988. I think both Eisenhower and Nixon were great presidents.
Here is what scares. Voters on the right are not given this kind of latitude by their party. Carter deregulated transportation and communications, and Clinton made larger cuts to welfare than Reagan or Bush. Voters on the right (who understood policy) should give these Democrats credit. Problem is: today's rightwing voter is less concerned with policy. They are conditioned to believe the Democrats are evil regardless of their policies. In fact, today's rightwing voter doesn't know that Reagan tripled Carter's debt. Today's rightwing voter isn't a policy thinker. They can't compare and contrast what each president actually did. They hate the Left unconditionally. This kind of political illiteracy is dangerous, and it speaks to why Trump's popularity is highest amongst non-college educated voters.
God help us.
You have no idea what the words mean.And that is why you are not in the mainstream. You want to use silly, unfounded theories based on opinion as fact.The Democratic Party is no more communist than is the Republican Party fascist.
Only followers of cultural mccarthyism, which is not a part of the mainstream GOP, talk about such nonsense.
I think Marxist collectivist is more accurate for todays dems
do you know what Marxist collectivist means? It is exactly what Obama, Clinton, and many far left dems have been preaching for years.
Look up the words then come back and try to discuss it intelligently.
Your silly is opinion is not fact, You don't get your own definitions, your own facts, your own self-evident proof. Neither do I.
We are are governed by terms and definitions and evidence.
I'm a moderate liberal. I voted for HW Bush in 1988. I think both Eisenhower and Nixon were great presidents.
Here is what scares. Voters on the right are not given this kind of latitude by their party. Carter deregulated transportation and communications, and Clinton made larger cuts to welfare than Reagan or Bush. Voters on the right (who understood policy) should give these Democrats credit. Problem is: today's rightwing voter is less concerned with policy. They are conditioned to believe the Democrats are evil regardless of their policies. In fact, today's rightwing voter doesn't know that Reagan tripled Carter's debt. Today's rightwing voter isn't a policy thinker. They can't compare and contrast what each president actually did. They hate the Left unconditionally. This kind of political illiteracy is dangerous, and it speaks to why Trump's popularity is highest amongst non-college educated voters.
God help us.
