Racists Love Republicans and Republicans Love Racists

[WelfareQueen]

Again....the real racism is to deny blacks the basic respect that they can obtain the American Dream and be successful.

Conservatives expect everyone to be successful.

Liberals state blacks cannot be successful____________(insert bullshit reason here).

Which is worse?

Looks like you just declared blacks can't think for themselves.

Nope. Read again. I am saying Liberals have told blacks for decades they are victims and cannot be successful in America.

Conservatives feel all Americans have the opportunity to be successful.

Now which message is more racist and destructive?

Liberals should be ashamed of the bullshit they have told minorities for decades, and continue to tell them.

You are completely full of shit.

Who got all the civil rights legislation passed you filthy liar? It was the Kennedy's, Hubert Humphrey and Lyndon Johnson. Johnson risked his entire political career fighting for civil rights. All these men were liberal Democrats you filthy liar.

Kennedy and Johnson desegregated the Southern schools and not because it was the popular thing to do in the savage racist South they did it because it was the right thing to do. They went against their base in the South to do the right thing. The Blue dog left the party. Today the Blue Dog are gone from the Dems because they were the slime. Have someone read this to you you pathetic illiterate supporter of racism and pedophilia. Where have the Blue Dogs gone and what it means for the Democratic Party s future

The blue dogs are gone you moron and they have been gone for a long time. The shit bum who posted a picture of the confederate battle flag pin with Clinton Gore on it either photo shopped it or the were appealing to the few blue dogs who are left.

More bullshit lies from the left. Those bills were passed with huge Republican support.

Dimocrats are always the biggest fucking liars. The co-sponsor of the Voting Rights Act was a Republican. Republicans overwhelmingly voted in support.

"The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was introduced in Congress on March 17, 1965 as S. 1564, and it was jointly sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-MT) and Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL)."

"Although Democrats held two-thirds of the seats in both chambers of Congress after the 1964 Senate elections,[14]:49 Johnson worried that Southern Democrats would filibuster the legislation, as they had opposed other civil rights efforts."


16 Dimocrats voted against the Voting Rights Act. Only two Republicans did so.

Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[WelfareQueen]

Let's recap.

Dylann Roof is a product of the racist South. He was strongly influence the by the rantings of a Republican campaign contributor. As a result Roof like his cowardly Republican heroes strolled into a church and gunned down 9 innocent people. This is what today's conservative Rethuglicans have come to be.

Today's Republicans are a cancer.

You are a racist, lying piece of shit.

 

[WelfareQueen]

House of Representatives voting record for the Voting Rights Act. Dimocrats lie again.

What else is new.


"Voting Rights Act by a 333-85 vote (Democrats 221-61, Republicans 112-24)."


Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[thereisnospoon]

Not all Republicans are racists but IMO most are to some degree. Nearly all racists are Republicans. The following report shows that Republicans accepted $65,000 from a White Supremicist who was a big hero of Dylann Roof.

Earl Holt, leader of the Council of Conservative Citizens is a racist who give money to Republicans including Ted Cruz and Cruz accepted the until it came out the Earl Holt was one of Dylann Roof's heroes. This is typical Republican behavior!

_______________________________________________

WASHINGTON (AP) — The leader of a white supremacist group cited by Charleston church murder suspect Dylann Roof made $65,000 in donations to Republicans, including several to Republican presidential candidates, The Guardian newspaper reported Sunday night.

Read the rest HERE!

This is less about Dylann Roof and more about his CONservative Republican mentors and the overall hypocrisy and evil that is the GOP.

The Council of Conservative Citizens website helped fuel Roof's maniacal hatred for non Whites. The Ku Klux Klan is alive and well and it has changed it's letters from KKK to GOP.

oh FUCK you....

 

[WelfareQueen]

Republicans Overwhelmingly supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964.


By party
The original House version:[20]

• Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
• Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)

Cloture in the Senate:[21]

• Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
• Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version:[20]

• Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
• Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:[20]

• Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
• Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Pogo]

Again....the real racism is to deny blacks the basic respect that they can obtain the American Dream and be successful.

Conservatives expect everyone to be successful.

Liberals state blacks cannot be successful____________(insert bullshit reason here).

Which is worse?

Looks like you just declared blacks can't think for themselves.

Nope. Read again. I am saying Liberals have told blacks for decades they are victims and cannot be successful in America.

Conservatives feel all Americans have the opportunity to be successful.

Now which message is more racist and destructive?

Liberals should be ashamed of the bullshit they have told minorities for decades, and continue to tell them.

You are completely full of shit.

Who got all the civil rights legislation passed you filthy liar? It was the Kennedy's, Hubert Humphrey and Lyndon Johnson. Johnson risked his entire political career fighting for civil rights. All these men were liberal Democrats you filthy liar.

Kennedy and Johnson desegregated the Southern schools and not because it was the popular thing to do in the savage racist South they did it because it was the right thing to do. They went against their base in the South to do the right thing. The Blue dog left the party. Today the Blue Dog are gone from the Dems because they were the slime. Have someone read this to you you pathetic illiterate supporter of racism and pedophilia. Where have the Blue Dogs gone and what it means for the Democratic Party s future

The blue dogs are gone you moron and they have been gone for a long time. The shit bum who posted a picture of the confederate battle flag pin with Clinton Gore on it either photo shopped it or the were appealing to the few blue dogs who are left.

More bullshit lies from the left. Those bills were passed with huge Republican support.

Dimocrats are always the biggest fucking liars. The co-sponsor of the Voting Rights Act was a Republican. Republicans overwhelmingly voted in support.

"The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was introduced in Congress on March 17, 1965 as S. 1564, and it was jointly sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-MT) and Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL)."

"Although Democrats held two-thirds of the seats in both chambers of Congress after the 1964 Senate elections,[14]:49 Johnson worried that Southern Democrats would filibuster the legislation, as they had opposed other civil rights efforts."


16 Dimocrats voted against the Voting Rights Act. Only two Republicans did so.

Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And you just noted there were a lot more Democrats in the Congress population, so that's not honest either.

Yew want patterns? I got chur pattern right here:

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But 94 on one side versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? Hey, you just hit the motherlode.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

And to think people bitch about "gridlock".

Canard obliterated. You may now return to your seat and roll out the next myth. We've heard 'em all before.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Per politifact it is 100% true that Republicans were major supporters of all the key 1960's Civil Rights Legislation.

Another Dimocrat lie put to rest.

Steele says GOP fought hard for civil rights bills in 1960s PolitiFact

 

[WelfareQueen]

Again....the real racism is to deny blacks the basic respect that they can obtain the American Dream and be successful.

Conservatives expect everyone to be successful.

Liberals state blacks cannot be successful____________(insert bullshit reason here).

Which is worse?

Looks like you just declared blacks can't think for themselves.

Nope. Read again. I am saying Liberals have told blacks for decades they are victims and cannot be successful in America.

Conservatives feel all Americans have the opportunity to be successful.

Now which message is more racist and destructive?

Liberals should be ashamed of the bullshit they have told minorities for decades, and continue to tell them.

You are completely full of shit.

Who got all the civil rights legislation passed you filthy liar? It was the Kennedy's, Hubert Humphrey and Lyndon Johnson. Johnson risked his entire political career fighting for civil rights. All these men were liberal Democrats you filthy liar.

Kennedy and Johnson desegregated the Southern schools and not because it was the popular thing to do in the savage racist South they did it because it was the right thing to do. They went against their base in the South to do the right thing. The Blue dog left the party. Today the Blue Dog are gone from the Dems because they were the slime. Have someone read this to you you pathetic illiterate supporter of racism and pedophilia. Where have the Blue Dogs gone and what it means for the Democratic Party s future

The blue dogs are gone you moron and they have been gone for a long time. The shit bum who posted a picture of the confederate battle flag pin with Clinton Gore on it either photo shopped it or the were appealing to the few blue dogs who are left.

More bullshit lies from the left. Those bills were passed with huge Republican support.

Dimocrats are always the biggest fucking liars. The co-sponsor of the Voting Rights Act was a Republican. Republicans overwhelmingly voted in support.

"The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was introduced in Congress on March 17, 1965 as S. 1564, and it was jointly sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-MT) and Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL)."

"Although Democrats held two-thirds of the seats in both chambers of Congress after the 1964 Senate elections,[14]:49 Johnson worried that Southern Democrats would filibuster the legislation, as they had opposed other civil rights efforts."


16 Dimocrats voted against the Voting Rights Act. Only two Republicans did so.

Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And you just noted there were a lot more Democrats in the Congress population, so that's not honest either.

Yew want patterns? I got chur pattern right here:

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But 94 on one side versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? Hey, you just hit the motherlode.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own and crutch on Googly Image Bullshit, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

And to think people bitch about "gridlock".

Canard obliterated.

The biggest opponent in the Senate was Robert Byrd D-West Virginia.

The bottom line Pogo....is the GOP support was stronger for Civil Rights Legislation than the Dims.

That point cannot be argued. The OP lied.

 

[Pogo]

Looks like you just declared blacks can't think for themselves.

Nope. Read again. I am saying Liberals have told blacks for decades they are victims and cannot be successful in America.

Conservatives feel all Americans have the opportunity to be successful.

Now which message is more racist and destructive?

Liberals should be ashamed of the bullshit they have told minorities for decades, and continue to tell them.

You are completely full of shit.

Who got all the civil rights legislation passed you filthy liar? It was the Kennedy's, Hubert Humphrey and Lyndon Johnson. Johnson risked his entire political career fighting for civil rights. All these men were liberal Democrats you filthy liar.

Kennedy and Johnson desegregated the Southern schools and not because it was the popular thing to do in the savage racist South they did it because it was the right thing to do. They went against their base in the South to do the right thing. The Blue dog left the party. Today the Blue Dog are gone from the Dems because they were the slime. Have someone read this to you you pathetic illiterate supporter of racism and pedophilia. Where have the Blue Dogs gone and what it means for the Democratic Party s future

The blue dogs are gone you moron and they have been gone for a long time. The shit bum who posted a picture of the confederate battle flag pin with Clinton Gore on it either photo shopped it or the were appealing to the few blue dogs who are left.

More bullshit lies from the left. Those bills were passed with huge Republican support.

Dimocrats are always the biggest fucking liars. The co-sponsor of the Voting Rights Act was a Republican. Republicans overwhelmingly voted in support.

"The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was introduced in Congress on March 17, 1965 as S. 1564, and it was jointly sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-MT) and Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL)."

"Although Democrats held two-thirds of the seats in both chambers of Congress after the 1964 Senate elections,[14]:49 Johnson worried that Southern Democrats would filibuster the legislation, as they had opposed other civil rights efforts."


16 Dimocrats voted against the Voting Rights Act. Only two Republicans did so.

Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And you just noted there were a lot more Democrats in the Congress population, so that's not honest either.

Yew want patterns? I got chur pattern right here:

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But 94 on one side versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? Hey, you just hit the motherlode.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own and crutch on Googly Image Bullshit, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

And to think people bitch about "gridlock".

Canard obliterated.

The biggest opponent in the Senate was Robert Byrd D-West Virginia.

The bottom line Pogo....is the GOP support was stronger for Civil Rights Legislation than the Dims.

That point cannot be argued. The OP lied.

The point? You just lost the point.
I don't think you can call 85 "stronger" than 94. Maybe it's my math. But it's not the significance you'd like to pretend it is.

Y'all partisan hacks will always get called on this shit.

 

[Freewill]

Per politifact it is 100% true that Republicans were major supporters of all the key 1960's Civil Rights Legislation.

Another Dimocrat lie put to rest.

Steele says GOP fought hard for civil rights bills in 1960s PolitiFact

Thanks for posting all the facts but it hardly puts it to rest. It SHOULD put it to rest but it won't. The left wing has been caught in their lies and shown the truth so many times it is amazing their ability to avoid the truth.

I, as would Reagan, not say they are ignorant, only that they know so much that isn't so.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Nope. Read again. I am saying Liberals have told blacks for decades they are victims and cannot be successful in America.

Conservatives feel all Americans have the opportunity to be successful.

Now which message is more racist and destructive?

Liberals should be ashamed of the bullshit they have told minorities for decades, and continue to tell them.

You are completely full of shit.

Who got all the civil rights legislation passed you filthy liar? It was the Kennedy's, Hubert Humphrey and Lyndon Johnson. Johnson risked his entire political career fighting for civil rights. All these men were liberal Democrats you filthy liar.

Kennedy and Johnson desegregated the Southern schools and not because it was the popular thing to do in the savage racist South they did it because it was the right thing to do. They went against their base in the South to do the right thing. The Blue dog left the party. Today the Blue Dog are gone from the Dems because they were the slime. Have someone read this to you you pathetic illiterate supporter of racism and pedophilia. Where have the Blue Dogs gone and what it means for the Democratic Party s future

The blue dogs are gone you moron and they have been gone for a long time. The shit bum who posted a picture of the confederate battle flag pin with Clinton Gore on it either photo shopped it or the were appealing to the few blue dogs who are left.

More bullshit lies from the left. Those bills were passed with huge Republican support.

Dimocrats are always the biggest fucking liars. The co-sponsor of the Voting Rights Act was a Republican. Republicans overwhelmingly voted in support.

"The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was introduced in Congress on March 17, 1965 as S. 1564, and it was jointly sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-MT) and Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL)."

"Although Democrats held two-thirds of the seats in both chambers of Congress after the 1964 Senate elections,[14]:49 Johnson worried that Southern Democrats would filibuster the legislation, as they had opposed other civil rights efforts."


16 Dimocrats voted against the Voting Rights Act. Only two Republicans did so.

Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And you just noted there were a lot more Democrats in the Congress population, so that's not honest either.

Yew want patterns? I got chur pattern right here:

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But 94 on one side versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? Hey, you just hit the motherlode.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own and crutch on Googly Image Bullshit, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

And to think people bitch about "gridlock".

Canard obliterated.

The biggest opponent in the Senate was Robert Byrd D-West Virginia.

The bottom line Pogo....is the GOP support was stronger for Civil Rights Legislation than the Dims.

That point cannot be argued. The OP lied.

The point? You just lost the point.

Y'all partisan hacks will always get called on this shit.

I just proved the OP is lying sack of shit. The GOP was instrumental is all key Civil Rights Legislation.

And you have no fucking point.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Per politifact it is 100% true that Republicans were major supporters of all the key 1960's Civil Rights Legislation.

Another Dimocrat lie put to rest.

Steele says GOP fought hard for civil rights bills in 1960s PolitiFact

Thanks for posting all the facts but it hardly puts it to rest. It SHOULD put it to rest but it won't. The left wing has been caught in their lies and shown the truth so many times it is amazing their ability to avoid the truth.

I, as would Reagan, not say they are ignorant, only that they know so much that isn't so.

Then just continue to hammer them with the facts. All the Dims have anymore are lies. Obama has been caught in so many lies but he doesn't care....even after being anointed with the "Lie of the Year" award.

Liars and cheats. Period.

 

[Pogo]

You are completely full of shit.

Who got all the civil rights legislation passed you filthy liar? It was the Kennedy's, Hubert Humphrey and Lyndon Johnson. Johnson risked his entire political career fighting for civil rights. All these men were liberal Democrats you filthy liar.

Kennedy and Johnson desegregated the Southern schools and not because it was the popular thing to do in the savage racist South they did it because it was the right thing to do. They went against their base in the South to do the right thing. The Blue dog left the party. Today the Blue Dog are gone from the Dems because they were the slime. Have someone read this to you you pathetic illiterate supporter of racism and pedophilia. Where have the Blue Dogs gone and what it means for the Democratic Party s future

The blue dogs are gone you moron and they have been gone for a long time. The shit bum who posted a picture of the confederate battle flag pin with Clinton Gore on it either photo shopped it or the were appealing to the few blue dogs who are left.

More bullshit lies from the left. Those bills were passed with huge Republican support.

Dimocrats are always the biggest fucking liars. The co-sponsor of the Voting Rights Act was a Republican. Republicans overwhelmingly voted in support.

"The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was introduced in Congress on March 17, 1965 as S. 1564, and it was jointly sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-MT) and Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL)."

"Although Democrats held two-thirds of the seats in both chambers of Congress after the 1964 Senate elections,[14]:49 Johnson worried that Southern Democrats would filibuster the legislation, as they had opposed other civil rights efforts."


16 Dimocrats voted against the Voting Rights Act. Only two Republicans did so.

Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And you just noted there were a lot more Democrats in the Congress population, so that's not honest either.

Yew want patterns? I got chur pattern right here:

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But 94 on one side versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? Hey, you just hit the motherlode.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own and crutch on Googly Image Bullshit, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

And to think people bitch about "gridlock".

Canard obliterated.

The biggest opponent in the Senate was Robert Byrd D-West Virginia.

The bottom line Pogo....is the GOP support was stronger for Civil Rights Legislation than the Dims.

That point cannot be argued. The OP lied.

The point? You just lost the point.

Y'all partisan hacks will always get called on this shit.

I just proved the OP is lying sack of shit. The GOP was instrumental is all key Civil Rights Legislation.

And you have no fucking point.

That's because I already buried you under it.

 

[WelfareQueen]

More bullshit lies from the left. Those bills were passed with huge Republican support.

Dimocrats are always the biggest fucking liars. The co-sponsor of the Voting Rights Act was a Republican. Republicans overwhelmingly voted in support.

"The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was introduced in Congress on March 17, 1965 as S. 1564, and it was jointly sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield (D-MT) and Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL)."

"Although Democrats held two-thirds of the seats in both chambers of Congress after the 1964 Senate elections,[14]:49 Johnson worried that Southern Democrats would filibuster the legislation, as they had opposed other civil rights efforts."


16 Dimocrats voted against the Voting Rights Act. Only two Republicans did so.

Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

And you just noted there were a lot more Democrats in the Congress population, so that's not honest either.

Yew want patterns? I got chur pattern right here:

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But 94 on one side versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? Hey, you just hit the motherlode.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own and crutch on Googly Image Bullshit, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

And to think people bitch about "gridlock".

Canard obliterated.

The biggest opponent in the Senate was Robert Byrd D-West Virginia.

The bottom line Pogo....is the GOP support was stronger for Civil Rights Legislation than the Dims.

That point cannot be argued. The OP lied.

The point? You just lost the point.

Y'all partisan hacks will always get called on this shit.

I just proved the OP is lying sack of shit. The GOP was instrumental is all key Civil Rights Legislation.

And you have no fucking point.

That's because I already buried you under it.

The GOP was instrumental in passing all key Civil Rights Legislation. Your inability to refute the facts are an admission of complete intellectual surrender.

Now fuck off and play somewhere else.

 

[Pogo]

And you just noted there were a lot more Democrats in the Congress population, so that's not honest either.

Yew want patterns? I got chur pattern right here:

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)

• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
• >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
• ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
• ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)

Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But 94 on one side versus 85 on one side is not significant.

But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? Hey, you just hit the motherlode.

The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own and crutch on Googly Image Bullshit, means cultural.

You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions. (!)

And to think people bitch about "gridlock".

Canard obliterated.

The biggest opponent in the Senate was Robert Byrd D-West Virginia.

The bottom line Pogo....is the GOP support was stronger for Civil Rights Legislation than the Dims.

That point cannot be argued. The OP lied.

The point? You just lost the point.

Y'all partisan hacks will always get called on this shit.

I just proved the OP is lying sack of shit. The GOP was instrumental is all key Civil Rights Legislation.

And you have no fucking point.

That's because I already buried you under it.

The GOP was instrumental in passing all key Civil Rights Legislation. Your inability to refute the facts are an admission of complete intellectual surrender.

Now fuck off and play somewhere else.

Poor hack.

 

[my2¢]

While we're talking about general opinions here, I'll express it is my thought that Republicans donate more money to help the poor, regardless of their race, then do Democrats - who'd rather look away and demand the government to take care of it.
Again, strictly an opinion.

 

[WelfareQueen]

While we're talking about general opinions here, I'll express it is my thought that Republicans donate more money to help the poor, regardless of their race, then do Democrats - who'd rather look away and demand the government to take care of it.
Again, strictly an opinion.

Your opinion happens to be fact. Conservatives are much more likely to donate time and money to charity.

Talk is cheap. Lies are even cheaper. That is all the Dims have left.

 

[Valerie]

Walmart to stop selling Confederate flag merchandise

Walmart to stop selling Confederate flag merchandise - CNNPolitics.com

 

[Valerie]

"We never want to offend anyone with the products that we offer. We have taken steps to remove all items promoting the confederate flag from our assortment -- whether in our stores or on our web site," said Walmart spokesman Brian Nick. "We have a process in place to help lead us to the right decisions when it comes to the merchandise we sell. Still, at times, items make their way into our assortment improperly -- this is one of those instances."

RELATED: Nikki Haley calls for removal of Confederate flag

 

[Valerie]

South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley on Monday called for the removal of the Confederate flag from the grounds of the State House.

"Today we are here in a moment of unity in our state without ill will to say it is time to remove the flag from our capitol grounds," said Haley, a Republican and the state's first non-white governor, while flanked by a diverse group of South Carolina politicians.

"This flag, while an integral part of our past, does not represent the future of our great state," she said.

The flag can only be removed from its location in front of the State legislature with the approval of two-thirds of that body. And Haley said if the state's General Assembly doesn't convene on the matter in this last week of the legislative year, she would call up lawmakers to the capital "under extraordinary measures."