Reactions to Kyle verdict define different views of the meaning of “justice.”

[Rigby5]

Wrong could have done something does not equal clear and present danger. Anyone driving a car can easily kill anyone they see. That does NOT give anyone the right to shoot a driver nor do they have gthe right to shoot anyone who sikply has a gun.

MOB violence is no such basis for civilization igt is a crime and a threat to all. There was no warranted mob or riot here. It was also not a mob in 1776 it was organized military resistance.

Wrong.
Cars are needed to get around.
There is no alternative.
Rifles are not needed, and are only brought to a violent situation like that in order to threaten people.
There was no other reason for Rittenhouse to go there with a rifle except to create a deadly threat.

No one brings a rifle to a riot or demonstration, and those that do deserve to be immediately killed.
Well if we need an "organized military resistence" in 1776, apparently we need another one now, since the police now are worse than the redcoats in 1776.

 

[Rigby5]

The shooting of Blake SEVEN times at close range was for very good reason and JUSTIFIED>

The riot was based on lies and false pretenses like all BLM riots.

The case against rittenhouse was non existant. He acted in self defense.

No, we have all seen the video and the shooting of Blake was totally UNJUSTIFIED.
They shot him in the back as he was trying to comfort his frightened children.
It was a serious felony for the police to even point guns at Blake.
They should all be in jail for decades.

Rittenhouse was totally in violation of dozens of laws.
As a juvenile, he could not even legally possess a rifle without an adult supervisor.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Cars are needed to get around.
There is no alternative.
Rifles are not needed, and are only brought to a violent situation like that in order to threaten people.
There was no other reason for Rittenhouse to go there with a rifle except to create a deadly threat.

No one brings a rifle to a riot or demonstration, and those that do deserve to be immediately killed.
Well if we need an "organized military resistence" in 1776, apparently we need another one now, since the police now are worse than the redcoats in 1776.

There are many alternatives, buses, uber, taxis etc etc.

Rifles are not needed and are no more or less dangerous than a car.

Rittenhouse proved he was no threat because he only and strictly shot those who illegally threatened his life.

A gun is a gun and the riot was illegal and unjustified many of the rioters were illegally armed and a rifle is the best choice against such SCUM

Your claim about the cops are provne lies

 

[Soupnazi630]

No, we have all seen the video and the shooting of Blake was totally UNJUSTIFIED.
They shot him in the back as he was trying to comfort his frightened children.
It was a serious felony for the police to even point guns at Blake.
They should all be in jail for decades.

You are an outriight liar.

The shooting of Blake was justified.

They were not HIS children he was abducting someone elses children and threatening them with a knife which was recovered. They shot hiom after less lethal methods to include a taser FAILED

The fact prove you WRONG

 

[OKTexas]

He is just a kid, think its fine they did not ruin his whole life with a murder conviction. That said he is not a hero, He was some where he should not have been with a fire arm. And people are dead.

Yeah, sucks to be them, eh? Perhaps future rioters will think twice.

.

 

[Rigby5]

Well a jury that got the real facts said you're full of shit. Just keep your commie ass and opinions north of the border.

.

Nonsense.
Everyone knows it really is illegal in WI for a minor to even be in possession of a rifle without adult supervision.
The case only revealed corruption to the point it questions all police, courts, judges, etc.
If they are going to lie like that, maybe we need to make an end of all of them, like we did in 1776?

 

[Rigby5]

Defend themselves? You’re just delusional or an outright liar. Rittenhouse never initiated an attack on anybody. Period. End of argument. NOT GUILTY. On ALL counts.

Wrong.
If Rittenhouse was not deliberately trying to frighten and intimidate people, then he would not have brought the rifle.
Notice no one else had a rifle or felt a need for one.

 

[BackAgain]

I saw the video, and Blake was obviously no threat to anyone.

Burning garbage in a dumpster is not arson, and arson is definitely warranted when the police failed to defend the rights of Blake.

Yes it IS illegal for someone under 18 to be in possession of a rifle when not at a range, under adult supervision, or hunting with a hunting permit.
The judge clearly rules totally and completely wrong, and can only have been deliberately lying in order to bias the case.

After Kyle deliberately went 20 miles out of his way with a rifle, the best outcome would have been if he has been shot and killed by the police.
Then there would have been less reason to believe police are racist in Kenosha.
Which they obviously are, if you had ever been to Kenosha.

I saw the video too. And it isn’t “obvious.” And it’s not even true. He was ignoring the cops. He had a knife and he was a total threat to the folks in the car. Plus which? He COULD have just complied.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nonsense.
Everyone knows it really is illegal in WI for a minor to even be in possession of a rifle without adult supervision.
The case only revealed corruption to the point it questions all police, courts, judges, etc.
If they are going to lie like that, maybe we need to make an end of all of them, like we did in 1776?

The judge proved you wrong.

he upled justice and the rule of law unlike the left wing pigs who were rioting

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
If Rittenhouse was not deliberately trying to frighten and intimidate people, then he would not have brought the rifle.
Notice no one else had a rifle or felt a need for one.

Wrong many others were there with rifles.

He was the only one the BLM pigs were dumb enough to attack

 

[Rigby5]

Too bad the jury and the evidence say you’re a liar.

That is silly.
Take the charge of a minor in possession of a rifle.
Everyone knows that is illegal.
The judge has ZERO legal basis for throwing that out.
That makes the judge a guilty co-conspirator.

 

[Rigby5]

Yeah, sucks to be them, eh? Perhaps future rioters will think twice.

.

Sure, they will think twice, and next time bring their own rifle.
You are an idiot.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is silly.
Take the charge of a minor in possession of a rifle.
Everyone knows that is illegal.
The judge has ZERO legal basis for throwing that out.
That makes the judge a guilty co-conspirator.

He did indeed have a basis for doing so


You are way out of touch and ignorant of the facts about this case the blake shooting and everything else.

 

[Rigby5]

The judge proved you wrong.

he upled justice and the rule of law unlike the left wing pigs who were rioting

That is silly.
Are you REALLY going to try to agree with the judge and claim it is legal in WI for a minor to be in possession of a rifle without adult supervision?
Everyone knows that is not legal.

 

[OKTexas]

Whether he would win or lose, has no bearing on whether this could be a money making venture for the right lawyer or Rittenhouse on a contingency deal. A go-fund-me site donation thing set up for reasonable expenses to fight the fight can pull in a lot of bucks and the right accountant and lawyers can make it work for the benefit of the kid, the lawyers and the accountant. It is the new American way.

Go fund me refused to allow him a legal defense fund, they're just a bunch of commies.

.

 

[Rigby5]

The judge proved you wrong.

he upled justice and the rule of law unlike the left wing pigs who were rioting

Justice and the rule of law says the police who shot Blake should be on trial for attempted murder.

 

[BackAgain]

That is silly.
Are you REALLY going to try to agree with the judge and claim it is legal in WI for a minor to be in possession of a rifle without adult supervision?
Everyone knows that is not legal.

No. Not everyone “knows” any such thing. You are factually and legally wrong. This is no surprise. You are badly informed and quite stupid.

 

[Rigby5]

He did indeed have a basis for doing so


You are way out of touch and ignorant of the facts about this case the blake shooting and everything else.

Wrong.
With the Blake shooting, the police claimed there was a knife, but clearly in the video we can see there could not have been a knife, nor did he ever even turn around.
He was shot in the back, over half a dozen times.
That is not remotely legal in any way, by anyone.

 

[OKTexas]

That is silly.
Are you REALLY going to try to agree with the judge and claim it is legal in WI for a minor to be in possession of a rifle without adult supervision?
Everyone knows that is not legal.

You dumb ass, the prosecutor agreed that it didn't apply before the judge dismissed it. Under WI law it is legal for a 17 year old to have a long gun.

.

 

[Rigby5]

No. Not everyone “knows” any such thing. You are factually and legally wrong. This is no surprise. You are badly informed and quite stupid.

Well then you are either a liar or idiot.

2015 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations :: 948. Crimes against children. :: 948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

law.justia.com

Read the statute.
It clearly is illegal for Kyle to possess a rifle.
There are a number of exceptions where it can be allowed, like at a range, under adult supervision, if in the military, etc., but none apply in the Kenosha riot situation.