Reactions to Kyle verdict define different views of the meaning of “justice.”

Black was Kyle's best friend. He was also dating Kyle's sister.

Black is the one that got Kyle interesting in shooting ARs.

When Kyle got his stimulus check he wanted to get an AR but since he was 17 he was not able to purchase one.

Black agreed to buy the rifle for Kyle but Kyle had to keep it at his house. Black would give it to him when Kyle was 18 in another few months.

On the day of the shootings Kyle got the rifle and took it with him with Black's knowledge.

Black is being is charged with two counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 causing death.

He could also be charged under Federal law for the straw purchase.

He is in deep dodo. Kyle walked free but Black won't skate unless the Prosecution lets him off the hook.

The prosecutor will likely deliberately throw the case, just like they did with Rittenhouse.
 
Wrong.
The police shooting Blake was wrong and illegal, so then the protests were right and legal.
Kyle was deliberately attempting to intimidate the legal protestor with an illegal display of deadly force.
That is the equivalent of sitting in front of a polling station with a rifle, to intimidate voters.

Rioting and destroying private property most certainly iS justice, and is the time honored tradition of the Boston Tea Party.
It is those defending the illegal attempted murder of Blake who are the criminals.
Wrong and an outright lie,

The shooting of blake was justified and legal. There was no protest it was an illegal riot.

Carrying a rufle is not intimidation. Rioting is.
 
No, they just should have succeeded in killing him.
He deserved to die for is illegal deadly threat to everyone.
It was not illegal for him to be there he had every right ot be and it was not illegal for him to be armed

He posed no deadly threat
 

{...

Wisconsin Teen Charged With Buying Rifle For Kyle Rittenhouse​

Dominick David Black bought the AR-style rifle allegedly used to kill two people during Kenosha protests because Rittenhouse wasn't old enough, authorities said.
A 19-year-old Wisconsin man was charged with felony weapons offenses for allegedly purchasing the AR-style rifle that 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse is accused of using to kill two people during protests in Kenosha over the summer.
Dominick David Black was charged last week with two counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a minor causing death, according to court records released following a court hearing on Monday. He faces up to 25 years in prison if convicted on both counts.
ADVERTISEMENT

Black used his friend’s money to purchase a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle for hunting earlier this year because Rittenhouse knew he wasn’t old enough to legally purchase the firearm himself, authorities said. Black stored the weapon in his stepfather’s home in Kenosha for Rittenhouse, according to a criminal complaint obtained by Kenosha News.

On Aug. 25, as protests erupted in Kenosha over the police shooting of Jacob Blake, Black asked Rittenhouse to help guard a local business with him, even though a citywide curfew was in place, authorities said. The two teens then went to Black’s stepfather’s house to retrieve the gun.
Black, armed with his own AR-15 style rifle, told police he was concerned about Rittenhouse having the gun because he wasn’t 18. He said he expected Rittenhouse “would have thrown a fit” if he tried to stop him, according to police.
As the two patrolled the streets, Rittenhouse shot three protesters in a scuffle that started when one of the victims threw a plastic bag, police said. Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, were killed. A third man was seriously wounded.
...}



So the huffy post is lying again. there was no curfew in place that night. But I guess we'll see how this plays out.

.
 
I already cited 948.60 and the other relevant WI statutes.
And yes, bringing a rifle to any political event is always illegal.
It is an attempt to deliberately intimidate with a threat of deadly force.

No one else had a rifle and no one else was attacked.
It was the deadly threat of the rifle that required Kyle to be attacked.
I would have attacked him as well, as any sane and responsible person would, to anyone crazy enough to bring a rifle to a political event.
No it is not and you were proven wrong by experts

Others had rifles.

It was a mindless riot not as [political event you are lying and making up fallacies as you go
 
what about the numerous people that were beaten ,hospitalized and a dozen or so that were murdered by the rioters last year ? they were unarmed ... do you think if they were armed they may have been able to defend themselves better ?

If individual get into a fight, that has nothing to do with riots.
There were not any people hospitalized or murdered by riots that I know of.
Except when the police or national guard start murdering innocent people, like at Kent State during Vietnam.
 
You are just a weak ass man with a small dick syndrome that feels empowered by a pistol, nothing less and nothing more.
And you go to the penis....

what is it with you anti-gun fascists and the penis? We talk about guns and you start fantasizing about the penis.....have you thought about getting counseling for this? Guns are not sex toys.....it is weong [sic] to get sexually stimulated by guns....youneed [sic] to get help...

There's a quote, of unknown origin, popularly but incorrectly attributed to Freud, about a fear of weapons being a sign of retarded sexual development or maturity.

And there are plenty of living examples, such as Issa, always there to prove that whomever did originally say this was exactly correct.
 
Black was Kyle's best friend. He was also dating Kyle's sister.

Black is the one that got Kyle interesting in shooting ARs.

When Kyle got his stimulus check he wanted to get an AR but since he was 17 he was not able to purchase one.

Black agreed to buy the rifle for Kyle but Kyle had to keep it at his house. Black would give it to him when Kyle was 18 in another few months.

On the day of the shootings Kyle got the rifle and took it with him with Black's knowledge.

Black is being is charged with two counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 causing death.

He could also be charged under Federal law for the straw purchase.

He is in deep dodo. Kyle walked free but Black won't skate unless the Prosecution lets him off the hook.


I'm not sure about that, can those charges stand if Rittenhouse legally possessed the weapon. :dunno:

.
 
So the huffy post is lying again. there was no curfew in place that night. But I guess we'll see how this plays out.

.

No, there was a curfew in place in Kenosha that night.
The judge just dropped that charge because the prosecution did not substantiate it.

{...
Judge Bruce Schroeder tossed an additional curfew charge on Tuesday, ruling that prosecutors had failed to produce any evidence that a curfew had been in place, according to CNN.
...}
 
No it is not and you were proven wrong by experts

Others had rifles.

It was a mindless riot not as [political event you are lying and making up fallacies as you go

Wrong.
It was a political protest over the shooting of Blake.
No one can deny that.
 
I'm not sure about that, can those charges stand if Rittenhouse legally possessed the weapon. :dunno:

.
Nobody denies Black made the straw purchase. He is pretty well fucked.

The best he can hope for is that since Kyle was found to innocent then they can't claim the gun was not used for a crime.
 
If individual get into a fight, that has nothing to do with riots.
There were not any people hospitalized or murdered by riots that I know of.
Except when the police or national guard start murdering innocent people, like at Kent State during Vietnam.
in the majority of the so called facts it was a mob attacking one innocent person ... leftists rarely fight one on one ! being a coward is a very very common quality among leftist rioters .
 
I'm not sure about that, can those charges stand if Rittenhouse legally possessed the weapon. :dunno:

.

No, the acquittal of Rittenhouse on WI charges are irrelevant.
The point is Rittenhouse was too young to buy according to federal law, so Black was doing an illegal straw purchase for Kyle.
But anyone who knows WI law, like an NRA member and WI resident like me, knows it was illegal for Kyle to possess the rifle without adult supervision.
 
No, the acquittal of Rittenhouse on WI charges are irrelevant.
The point is Rittenhouse was too young to buy according to federal law, so Black was doing an illegal straw purchase for Kyle.
But anyone who knows WI law, like an NRA member and WI resident like me, knows it was illegal for Kyle to possess the rifle without adult supervision.
None of which negates his right to self defense
 
No, there was a curfew in place in Kenosha that night.
The judge just dropped that charge because the prosecution did not substantiate it.

{...
Judge Bruce Schroeder tossed an additional curfew charge on Tuesday, ruling that prosecutors had failed to produce any evidence that a curfew had been in place, according to CNN.
...}


So no evidence of a curfew means there was a curfew? Only in the world of commie regressives I guess. LAMO

.
 
Nobody denies Black made the straw purchase. He is pretty well fucked.

The best he can hope for is that since Kyle was found to innocent then they can't claim the gun was not used for a crime.


You might want to proof read that post.

.
 
Liar.
Blake was no criminal and he had no weapon
He was going to his kids in the back seat.

Destruction of property is always warranted in order to force compliance by an evil group.
That is why we bombed Berlin and Hiroshima in WWII.
It is the police who were in violation of the law.

Mostly Black businesses were destroyed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top