- Thread starter
- #121
No, I haven't.How so? What have I said that is not true or clouds the issue?Interesting word salad, or tap-dance, designed to cloud the issue.
True or False: The UE rate is intended and or publically touted by BLS as a measure of suffering or underemployment?
True or False: BLS does not publically disclose their methodology or defintions and/or lies about the definitions?
Both of those would have to be true for the OP to be correct.
While trying to do the opposite, you've essentially agreed that the article was correct.
Now you're claiming they're fixed? How?The fixed numbers authored by Obama's BLS was for the low information voter who sees only the headline...
And how are they meant for people who only see the headline? Have you ever read the actual news release, not what the media feeds you? In no way could you claim the news release from BLS is in any way deceptive.
]
"And a knowledgeable source says the deception went beyond that one employee — that it escalated at the time President Obama was seeking reelection in 2012 and continues today."
Census 8216 faked 8217 2012 election jobs report New York Post
A secret source...thats totally unbelieveable since the person he claims did it wasnt even an employee there.
"...the deception went beyond that one employee...":
Therefore....it doesn't end at "he,"....you dolt.