TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
And yet, the numbers themselves are neutral.
They tell a story all on their own, without any help from us.
Sure, and you think your arrogance stands as an argument. As mud just mentioned above me, Politics USA hailed Obamacare as a 'raging success.' That points to a bias right there.
Carbine has no room to talk, since she made mention in Fox's Phil Robertson thread that she was more unbiased than anyone, including Foxfyre herself. Talk about lame. How can carbine, a flaming liberal, lecture anyone on bias?
And yes, Carbine's attack is fallacy. I made sure not to reference any biased sources. It is a non sequitur. A trap argument.
You two make a great couple. I called MisterBeale for citing a neoconsevative website in the Israel and Palestine forum the other day. I don't like biased sources, left or right. You will rarely find me citing them, if at all.
Do you not understand that a fact is a fact no matter who states it? Is that too complicated for you?
Do you understand how idiotic that statement is? Are you suggesting that a fact is irrefutable regardless of the source? A fact is only a fact if it can be verified. It matters a great deal who says it and how they use it. Make sense? Or is it too complicated for you?
Last edited: