If the law is working, how could he be persecuted when we know for a fact he broke the law?I see. Trump is not being persecuted? How do you figure that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the law is working, how could he be persecuted when we know for a fact he broke the law?I see. Trump is not being persecuted? How do you figure that?
Who cares?Because in the earlier attempt to get ALL the documents, team trump LIED, as usual, and signed off that they were ALL there. team trump LIED, the FBI didn't leave them there at MAL, team trump hid the documents, and LIED.
It's pretty easy to understand, even a retarded moron like BackAgain knows this, but is still in denial.
No he didn't.
Waving your tiny little fairy hands over imaginary boxes and shouting "Abracadabra" Doesn't declassify.
And, he shouldn't have STOLEN them, regardless of their classification.
No matter how much you scream and cry, the documents are not trumps, he can't just take them.
Who cares what Patel says.
How could Patel possibly know?
No, you have to protect sources.Hiding information instead of protecting sources
Not acceptable
That Trump has not been falsely accused for the last 7 years? No convictions prove it for me.No! I'll be waiting? Prove me wrong.
Patel said, but how could Patel know?And yes, what Patel said is that the President had declassified the previously declassified documents.
And just did not bother to tell anyone till after the FBI searched his home.
How very convenient
But Patel Said.......... LOLLOLL you fucking moron.I don’t know who was told or when. And you don’t either.
That was during his campaign. He never sent the DoJ after her.Lock her up
I think they are just going to repeat the witch hunt claim as whine that Hillary wasn’t locked up for doing the same thingDo you think that the Trump team will return to that charge against the FBI planting the evidence?
It would be the most powerful reason they could use and it would most likely be accepted by Trump's faithful. In fact, it might be necessary now as every other defense has evaporated away.
It would be a better bet than using the 'declassifying' argument.
Redaction does not prove legitimacy but certainly proves desire to hide and obstructActually the redacted affidavit proves there were 28 pages of names and sensitive info given to the judge.
You think so?Redaction does not prove legitimacy but certainly proves desire to hide and obstruct
Your victory will be short lived as the judge Knows what was in the unredacted and he will order to be brought to light what they are hiding
Tump did send the DOJ after Hillary. From Durham to Horowitz. But he couldn't get Sessions or even Barr to throw away their careers by using extra-level means.That was during his campaign. He never sent the DoJ after her.
Yes it was;And none of it was classified....
Yes it was;
The but but buts from Donald. Does he know the world thinks he's an ass?May as well save everyone the bother of clicking on it.
It's basically a bunch of this, predicatably....
View attachment 687342
You know what they are repeating? They are repeating the constant distraction from what is happening to this country. It is being destroyed by the policies in place while politicians and the media go after Trump creating hate and division. It is what they live on and it is what this country will die from.I think they are just going to repeat the witch hunt claim as whine that Hillary wasn’t locked up for doing the same thing
The judge said the redactions were for legitimate reasons. He was given the full unredacted affidavit, so he intimately knew what was in it.Redaction does not prove legitimacy but certainly proves desire to hide and obstruct
Your victory will be short lived as the judge Knows what was in the unredacted and he will order to be brought to light what they are hiding