Redacted Affadavit officially released

Because in the earlier attempt to get ALL the documents, team trump LIED, as usual, and signed off that they were ALL there. team trump LIED, the FBI didn't leave them there at MAL, team trump hid the documents, and LIED.

It's pretty easy to understand, even a retarded moron like BackAgain knows this, but is still in denial.

No he didn't.
Waving your tiny little fairy hands over imaginary boxes and shouting "Abracadabra" Doesn't declassify.

And, he shouldn't have STOLEN them, regardless of their classification.
No matter how much you scream and cry, the documents are not trumps, he can't just take them.

Who cares what Patel says.
How could Patel possibly know?
Who cares?
 
if I had to guess what the argument will be from the bootlickers, I'd go with "She was Secretary of State at the time -- this is a civilian and the real outrage is [some invented outrage considerably less grave than absconding with state secrets]"
 
Do you think that the Trump team will return to that charge against the FBI planting the evidence?
It would be the most powerful reason they could use and it would most likely be accepted by Trump's faithful. In fact, it might be necessary now as every other defense has evaporated away.
It would be a better bet than using the 'declassifying' argument.
I think they are just going to repeat the witch hunt claim as whine that Hillary wasn’t locked up for doing the same thing
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: BWK
Actually the redacted affidavit proves there were 28 pages of names and sensitive info given to the judge.
Redaction does not prove legitimacy but certainly proves desire to hide and obstruct
Your victory will be short lived as the judge Knows what was in the unredacted and he will order to be brought to light what they are hiding
 
Redaction does not prove legitimacy but certainly proves desire to hide and obstruct
Your victory will be short lived as the judge Knows what was in the unredacted and he will order to be brought to light what they are hiding
You think so? :abgg2q.jpg:
 
That was during his campaign. He never sent the DoJ after her.
Tump did send the DOJ after Hillary. From Durham to Horowitz. But he couldn't get Sessions or even Barr to throw away their careers by using extra-level means.
 
“National defense information” — Trump didn’t take his own notes to his beach house. He took information that protects our troops. Then refused to give it back. That is a crime. Why did he take them? Unclear. But we know the same guy traded military aid to get dirt on Biden
 
I think they are just going to repeat the witch hunt claim as whine that Hillary wasn’t locked up for doing the same thing
You know what they are repeating? They are repeating the constant distraction from what is happening to this country. It is being destroyed by the policies in place while politicians and the media go after Trump creating hate and division. It is what they live on and it is what this country will die from.
 
Redaction does not prove legitimacy but certainly proves desire to hide and obstruct
Your victory will be short lived as the judge Knows what was in the unredacted and he will order to be brought to light what they are hiding
The judge said the redactions were for legitimate reasons. He was given the full unredacted affidavit, so he intimately knew what was in it.
He also read the accompanying affidavit which explained the importance of keeping sections of the search warrant affidavit seal for purposes of witness protection, national security, and grand jury testimony.

The judge agreed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top